01.02.2014 Views

Incest 0000i-xiv FM 1 - William L. White

Incest 0000i-xiv FM 1 - William L. White

Incest 0000i-xiv FM 1 - William L. White

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Promoting Health in the Microsystem 277<br />

that have workers in key roles who have not had performance<br />

evaluations in years.<br />

C. The Reliance on Money as a Reinforcer. Most personnel<br />

evaluation systems rely heavily on the annual merit salary increase<br />

as the primary reward to workers and the concrete evidence<br />

of feedback on their performance. The following<br />

observations apply to such reliance:<br />

• In practice, annual salary increases have little to do with the<br />

performance of an employee. Such increases are so automatic<br />

in most agencies that they simply confirm that an employee<br />

has remained in the organization another 365 days. Since the<br />

increase is not tied to identifiable behavior, it has little use as<br />

a feedback mechanism for exemplary performance.<br />

• In feedback-deprived systems, the distribution of financial<br />

rewards can become extremely competitive and conflictual.<br />

Lacking other sources of affirmation, a staff will use money in<br />

its struggle for status, personal affirmation, and recognition<br />

in such systems. If there are multiple sources of feedback,<br />

money loses this symbolic function and its power as a primary<br />

reinforcer.<br />

• Until such time as health and human services workers have<br />

performance objectives and monetary incentives linked to<br />

the achievement of objectives that are as clear and visible as<br />

those in such companies as Amway and Mary Kay Cosmetics,<br />

more effective and sustainable mechanisms of feedback and<br />

reward must be built into these service systems.<br />

Building in Mechanisms for Acknowledgment and Feedback. Feedback<br />

consists of a regular flow of data to each worker that identifies acceptable<br />

performance, defines unacceptable performance for purposes of<br />

self-correction, and acknowledges exemplary performance.<br />

A. Factors that Inhibit Stroking Behavior. Few supervisors or<br />

managers appreciate the awesome power they command. Such<br />

power is usually thought of in terms of control, decision making,<br />

and the more punitive authority to take disciplinary action<br />

over others. The power referred to here is a very different kind<br />

of power; it involves the ability of a supervisor to recognize and<br />

acknowledge human competence, to affirm value and worth, to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!