01.02.2014 Views

Incest 0000i-xiv FM 1 - William L. White

Incest 0000i-xiv FM 1 - William L. White

Incest 0000i-xiv FM 1 - William L. White

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Organizational Responses to Distressed Workers 17<br />

• The cognitive approach<br />

• The training approach<br />

• The environmental approach<br />

• The systems approach<br />

Note that each approach described has profound repercussions on those<br />

experiencing professional distress and on the future incidence of professional<br />

distress in the organization.<br />

Ideally, this schema will provide managers an opportunity to review<br />

their own assumptions about worker distress and to assess their own supervisory<br />

responses to those experiencing professional distress. Undertake<br />

this self-examination in a spirit of openness, and check the natural<br />

tendency for defensiveness. The criticism of various approaches is based<br />

on the knowledge that many of us have exemplified some of these styles<br />

at different stages of our managerial careers.<br />

2.1 The Authoritarian-Moral Approach:<br />

Professional Distress as Bad Character<br />

The authoritarian-moral approach to professional distress reflects what<br />

Douglas McGregor called the “theory X” philosophy of management.<br />

Theory X is based on the assumption that most people dislike work, lack<br />

ambition, are essentially passive, avoid responsibility, resist change, and<br />

are self-centered and unconcerned with the needs of the organization.<br />

The role of the manager is thus to direct, motivate, manipulate, persuade,<br />

control, reward, and punish the worker to effectively respond to<br />

the needs of the organization (McGregor 1967, 1973).<br />

Within the organization managed by the propositions of theory X,<br />

even the existence of professional distress is adamantly denied through<br />

such flippant phrases as, “There’s no such thing as stress, only staff<br />

who don’t want to work.” Behavior indicative of professional distress<br />

is viewed as emerging from character flaws in the worker. While the<br />

authoritarian-moral approach is usually applied to workers on an individual<br />

basis, it may be broadened to encompass stereotyped responses<br />

to particular subgroups of workers. In the latter case, distress-related<br />

behavior of the individual worker is seen as justifying the manager’s<br />

view of the unreliable and irresponsible character of a group of workers,<br />

most often women, people of color, or older workers.<br />

Organizational managers who typify the authoritarian-moral approach<br />

are intensely invested in their work and have great difficulty

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!