Three Essays on Executive Compensation - KOPS - Universität ...
Three Essays on Executive Compensation - KOPS - Universität ...
Three Essays on Executive Compensation - KOPS - Universität ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Profit Sharing with <strong>Executive</strong>s<br />
Dividend payout ratio.<br />
Firms with a low dividend payout ratio (fracti<strong>on</strong> of<br />
available cash paid to shareholders) typically retain cash for investment opportunities,<br />
and do not necessarily allocate more cash to the top management. Empirical<br />
studies show that dividend and compensati<strong>on</strong> policies are related through a firm’s<br />
investment opportunities (Smith and Watts, 1992). This calls for a positive relati<strong>on</strong><br />
between the dividend payout ratio and the top management’s cash-flow share. We<br />
calculate the dividend payout ratio (DPR) as the fracti<strong>on</strong> of OCF BC it (OCF BB it<br />
in regressi<strong>on</strong>s for the b<strong>on</strong>us ratio) dedicated to shareholders as dividend payments:<br />
DP R it =<br />
DIV it<br />
OCF BC it<br />
, where DIV it is the total amount paid as dividends to comm<strong>on</strong><br />
shareholders of firm i in fiscal year t 22 .<br />
To test Hypothesis 2, we measure n<strong>on</strong>-cash compensati<strong>on</strong> as follows:<br />
L<strong>on</strong>g-term incentives. Firms with plenty productive investment opportunities<br />
may choose to grant the top management n<strong>on</strong>-cash compensati<strong>on</strong> and retain cash<br />
for investment. N<strong>on</strong>-cash compensati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sists of l<strong>on</strong>g-term incentive (LTI) compensati<strong>on</strong><br />
such as company stock, opti<strong>on</strong>s or firm-specific LTI plans. We measure<br />
l<strong>on</strong>g-term incentives as the grant-date value of n<strong>on</strong>-cash compensati<strong>on</strong> divided by<br />
total compensati<strong>on</strong> 23 . Hypothesis 2 calls for a negative relati<strong>on</strong> between l<strong>on</strong>g-term<br />
incentives and the top management’s cash-flow share.<br />
To test Hypothesis 3, we add the following variable:<br />
Firm size. We measure firm size by total assets at the end of the fiscal year.<br />
Hypothesis 3 suggests a negative relati<strong>on</strong> between firm size and the managerial<br />
cash-flow share.<br />
To test Hypothesis 4, we later add two measures of managerial power:<br />
E-index. The E-index is the entrenchment index developed by Bebchuk et al.<br />
(2009). The index is based <strong>on</strong> six equally weighted corporate governance provisi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
which provide the top management with protecti<strong>on</strong> from being removed, or the<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sequences of removal, and thus limit the power of shareholders vis-à-vis the top<br />
management. The E-index measures the level of managerial entrenchment <strong>on</strong> a scale<br />
22 Stock repurchases have become increasingly prominent to reward shareholders in additi<strong>on</strong> to<br />
dividend payments. In a robustness check we find that our results do not change qualitatively when<br />
we add to DIV it a proxy for stock repurchases (we discuss this proxy in the robustness secti<strong>on</strong>).<br />
23 Taking the Dollar value instead yields similar results but may -<strong>on</strong>ce again- be influenced by<br />
a firm size effect, because typically in large firms the managerial cash-flow share is small and the<br />
Dollar value of n<strong>on</strong>-cash compensati<strong>on</strong> is large.<br />
127