28.02.2014 Views

Three Essays on Executive Compensation - KOPS - Universität ...

Three Essays on Executive Compensation - KOPS - Universität ...

Three Essays on Executive Compensation - KOPS - Universität ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Profit Sharing with <strong>Executive</strong>s<br />

Dividend payout ratio.<br />

Firms with a low dividend payout ratio (fracti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

available cash paid to shareholders) typically retain cash for investment opportunities,<br />

and do not necessarily allocate more cash to the top management. Empirical<br />

studies show that dividend and compensati<strong>on</strong> policies are related through a firm’s<br />

investment opportunities (Smith and Watts, 1992). This calls for a positive relati<strong>on</strong><br />

between the dividend payout ratio and the top management’s cash-flow share. We<br />

calculate the dividend payout ratio (DPR) as the fracti<strong>on</strong> of OCF BC it (OCF BB it<br />

in regressi<strong>on</strong>s for the b<strong>on</strong>us ratio) dedicated to shareholders as dividend payments:<br />

DP R it =<br />

DIV it<br />

OCF BC it<br />

, where DIV it is the total amount paid as dividends to comm<strong>on</strong><br />

shareholders of firm i in fiscal year t 22 .<br />

To test Hypothesis 2, we measure n<strong>on</strong>-cash compensati<strong>on</strong> as follows:<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g-term incentives. Firms with plenty productive investment opportunities<br />

may choose to grant the top management n<strong>on</strong>-cash compensati<strong>on</strong> and retain cash<br />

for investment. N<strong>on</strong>-cash compensati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sists of l<strong>on</strong>g-term incentive (LTI) compensati<strong>on</strong><br />

such as company stock, opti<strong>on</strong>s or firm-specific LTI plans. We measure<br />

l<strong>on</strong>g-term incentives as the grant-date value of n<strong>on</strong>-cash compensati<strong>on</strong> divided by<br />

total compensati<strong>on</strong> 23 . Hypothesis 2 calls for a negative relati<strong>on</strong> between l<strong>on</strong>g-term<br />

incentives and the top management’s cash-flow share.<br />

To test Hypothesis 3, we add the following variable:<br />

Firm size. We measure firm size by total assets at the end of the fiscal year.<br />

Hypothesis 3 suggests a negative relati<strong>on</strong> between firm size and the managerial<br />

cash-flow share.<br />

To test Hypothesis 4, we later add two measures of managerial power:<br />

E-index. The E-index is the entrenchment index developed by Bebchuk et al.<br />

(2009). The index is based <strong>on</strong> six equally weighted corporate governance provisi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

which provide the top management with protecti<strong>on</strong> from being removed, or the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sequences of removal, and thus limit the power of shareholders vis-à-vis the top<br />

management. The E-index measures the level of managerial entrenchment <strong>on</strong> a scale<br />

22 Stock repurchases have become increasingly prominent to reward shareholders in additi<strong>on</strong> to<br />

dividend payments. In a robustness check we find that our results do not change qualitatively when<br />

we add to DIV it a proxy for stock repurchases (we discuss this proxy in the robustness secti<strong>on</strong>).<br />

23 Taking the Dollar value instead yields similar results but may -<strong>on</strong>ce again- be influenced by<br />

a firm size effect, because typically in large firms the managerial cash-flow share is small and the<br />

Dollar value of n<strong>on</strong>-cash compensati<strong>on</strong> is large.<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!