07.03.2014 Views

Predictive Control of Three Phase AC/DC Converters

Predictive Control of Three Phase AC/DC Converters

Predictive Control of Three Phase AC/DC Converters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5<br />

Investigations <strong>of</strong> <strong>Control</strong><br />

Methods Performance<br />

5.1 Robustness to Parameters Mismatch<br />

Model <strong>Predictive</strong> <strong>Control</strong> bases on mathematical description <strong>of</strong> the grid and converter.<br />

Algorithm works correct as long as the parameters used in model are<br />

correct. In this Chapter influence <strong>of</strong> model parameters mismatch: choke inductance<br />

L and resistance R, will be investigated for VSF and CSF control methods.<br />

Furthermore, on-line choke inductance estimator will be presented. Also, selected<br />

control methods will be tested under line voltage distortions. Investigations have<br />

been performed on the basis <strong>of</strong> simulation models and experimental tests on<br />

laboratory set-up as well.<br />

5.1.1 Filter‘s Inductance Variations<br />

Figure 5.1 shows average switching frequency F swAV in VSF-P-DPC method for<br />

1 and 2 kW <strong>of</strong> load versus choke inductance value mismatch, used in predictive<br />

model L C . Choke inductance mismatch ∆L is defined as:<br />

∆L = L C − L<br />

100[%] (5.1)<br />

L<br />

where L C is inductance used in control method, and L is real value. Figure 5.2<br />

shows calculated power error ∆S defined as:<br />

∆S =<br />

√<br />

(Pref − P ) 2 + (Q ref − Q) 2<br />

√<br />

P 2 ref + Q2 ref<br />

(5.2)<br />

versus ∆L whereas, Fig. 5.3 shows T HD i factor variation under L mismatch.<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!