Predictive Control of Three Phase AC/DC Converters
Predictive Control of Three Phase AC/DC Converters
Predictive Control of Three Phase AC/DC Converters
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 5<br />
Investigations <strong>of</strong> <strong>Control</strong><br />
Methods Performance<br />
5.1 Robustness to Parameters Mismatch<br />
Model <strong>Predictive</strong> <strong>Control</strong> bases on mathematical description <strong>of</strong> the grid and converter.<br />
Algorithm works correct as long as the parameters used in model are<br />
correct. In this Chapter influence <strong>of</strong> model parameters mismatch: choke inductance<br />
L and resistance R, will be investigated for VSF and CSF control methods.<br />
Furthermore, on-line choke inductance estimator will be presented. Also, selected<br />
control methods will be tested under line voltage distortions. Investigations have<br />
been performed on the basis <strong>of</strong> simulation models and experimental tests on<br />
laboratory set-up as well.<br />
5.1.1 Filter‘s Inductance Variations<br />
Figure 5.1 shows average switching frequency F swAV in VSF-P-DPC method for<br />
1 and 2 kW <strong>of</strong> load versus choke inductance value mismatch, used in predictive<br />
model L C . Choke inductance mismatch ∆L is defined as:<br />
∆L = L C − L<br />
100[%] (5.1)<br />
L<br />
where L C is inductance used in control method, and L is real value. Figure 5.2<br />
shows calculated power error ∆S defined as:<br />
∆S =<br />
√<br />
(Pref − P ) 2 + (Q ref − Q) 2<br />
√<br />
P 2 ref + Q2 ref<br />
(5.2)<br />
versus ∆L whereas, Fig. 5.3 shows T HD i factor variation under L mismatch.<br />
77