View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores
View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores
View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
13-0211-07 Moved by: Deputy Mayor Davis-Dagg<br />
Seconded by: Councillor Scott<br />
That staff prepare a report on the viability and costs <strong>of</strong> a diagonal patch road<br />
repair at 60 Main Street, South in Forest.<br />
Carried<br />
Follow-Up with AMEC<br />
<strong>The</strong> information presented during the delegation on this issue on February 11, 2013 did<br />
not paint a positive impression <strong>of</strong> AMEC’s work. As a result staff met with a senior<br />
AMEC representative on February 21 to review the concerns expressed by the<br />
complainant and to determine if the study was completed negligently. AMEC Has asked<br />
to go on record with the following statement:<br />
“Thank you for giving me the opportunity to meet with you yesterday to discuss<br />
the general premise and results <strong>of</strong> the vibration monitoring presented in our<br />
Report SW0512033 dated 30 November. It was concluded that the work was<br />
carried out pr<strong>of</strong>essionally and as per the expected and agreed scope. <strong>The</strong><br />
magnitudes <strong>of</strong> the vibrations measured were much lower than the level at which<br />
structural damage could be expected. An exhaustive long term vibration study to<br />
determine the very low threshold levels <strong>of</strong> vibration perceptible by humans would<br />
be relatively much more expensive than the current study.<br />
Again, thank you for giving AMEC the opportunity to be <strong>of</strong> service to <strong>Lambton</strong><br />
<strong>Shores</strong>.”<br />
C. (Kees) Kooy<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Engineers Ontario Licensee<br />
Geotechnical Specialist<br />
AMEC Environment and Infrastructure<br />
Each <strong>of</strong> the four concerns presented in the delegation were provided to AMEC for<br />
comment, and the information below was provided respecting each concern:<br />
1. <strong>The</strong> AMEC representative confirmed municipal staff’s statement that the test was<br />
representative as the load on the road will never be greater than when two trucks<br />
pass by the same location at the same time, regardless <strong>of</strong> traffic volume.<br />
2. As above, AMEC confirmed that, in their opinion, the study was representative<br />
based on the scope requested. <strong>The</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> the project was to confirm if surface<br />
vibrations were caused by the roadway.<br />
3. <strong>The</strong> AMEC representative confirmed that monitoring discs were placed directly<br />
on the ground and sandbags were then placed on top <strong>of</strong> the monitors. This is<br />
standard practice to ensure the disc is in direct contact with the ground with the<br />
sand bag preventing the disc from moving during the test. Photo documentation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the testing shows this to be the case.<br />
4. AMEC confirmed their staff is qualified to complete this work, and <strong>of</strong>fered the<br />
company’s curriculum vitae for review should Council desire it.<br />
In addition to the above, the senior AMEC representative provided the following<br />
information that is useful for consideration 116 <strong>of</strong> this issue: