26.04.2014 Views

View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores

View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores

View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13-0211-07 Moved by: Deputy Mayor Davis-Dagg<br />

Seconded by: Councillor Scott<br />

That staff prepare a report on the viability and costs <strong>of</strong> a diagonal patch road<br />

repair at 60 Main Street, South in Forest.<br />

Carried<br />

Follow-Up with AMEC<br />

<strong>The</strong> information presented during the delegation on this issue on February 11, 2013 did<br />

not paint a positive impression <strong>of</strong> AMEC’s work. As a result staff met with a senior<br />

AMEC representative on February 21 to review the concerns expressed by the<br />

complainant and to determine if the study was completed negligently. AMEC Has asked<br />

to go on record with the following statement:<br />

“Thank you for giving me the opportunity to meet with you yesterday to discuss<br />

the general premise and results <strong>of</strong> the vibration monitoring presented in our<br />

Report SW0512033 dated 30 November. It was concluded that the work was<br />

carried out pr<strong>of</strong>essionally and as per the expected and agreed scope. <strong>The</strong><br />

magnitudes <strong>of</strong> the vibrations measured were much lower than the level at which<br />

structural damage could be expected. An exhaustive long term vibration study to<br />

determine the very low threshold levels <strong>of</strong> vibration perceptible by humans would<br />

be relatively much more expensive than the current study.<br />

Again, thank you for giving AMEC the opportunity to be <strong>of</strong> service to <strong>Lambton</strong><br />

<strong>Shores</strong>.”<br />

C. (Kees) Kooy<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Engineers Ontario Licensee<br />

Geotechnical Specialist<br />

AMEC Environment and Infrastructure<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> the four concerns presented in the delegation were provided to AMEC for<br />

comment, and the information below was provided respecting each concern:<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> AMEC representative confirmed municipal staff’s statement that the test was<br />

representative as the load on the road will never be greater than when two trucks<br />

pass by the same location at the same time, regardless <strong>of</strong> traffic volume.<br />

2. As above, AMEC confirmed that, in their opinion, the study was representative<br />

based on the scope requested. <strong>The</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> the project was to confirm if surface<br />

vibrations were caused by the roadway.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> AMEC representative confirmed that monitoring discs were placed directly<br />

on the ground and sandbags were then placed on top <strong>of</strong> the monitors. This is<br />

standard practice to ensure the disc is in direct contact with the ground with the<br />

sand bag preventing the disc from moving during the test. Photo documentation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the testing shows this to be the case.<br />

4. AMEC confirmed their staff is qualified to complete this work, and <strong>of</strong>fered the<br />

company’s curriculum vitae for review should Council desire it.<br />

In addition to the above, the senior AMEC representative provided the following<br />

information that is useful for consideration 116 <strong>of</strong> this issue:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!