15.05.2014 Views

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

H. L. GalbmiLb 1<br />

continued~<br />

12th lllayl883.<br />

1502<br />

coulLl give you now would be unreliable, and I woi1ld not make an answer that I would not substantiate.<br />

It would not be fair either to you or myself.<br />

50720. By Mr. Longmore.-The question <strong>of</strong> rent, <strong>of</strong> com,se, interests every farmer who goes upon<br />

land, who has not laud <strong>of</strong> his own. ·would it pay you to give a rent for land to grow 25 bushels <strong>of</strong> oats to<br />

the acre ?-No, I would not cultivate such land.<br />

50721. From Haytcr's statistics we find that the average last year was 24 bushels to the acre, and<br />

9~ bushels <strong>of</strong> wheat. Would it pay yon to pay rent fo1· any land that would grow that ?-It might pay<br />

this way, that you pay the Government Is. an acre for twenty years.<br />

50722. Would it pay you to pay your present rent?-No, decidedly not<br />

50723. By Mr. JJ[unro.-You were going to say something about bags jnst now. What was it?­<br />

The grMt grievance <strong>of</strong> the farmer is, that the middleman in town gets the bags weighed in ; we pay lOd.<br />

for the bags, and I do not believe we get lid. for them .<br />

.'50724. That is not a matter connected with the Customs?-We care nothing ltbout the duty, the<br />

duty is nothing. .<br />

50725. Is not that a matter that the farrHers could regulate for themselves ?-If they stuck together<br />

and had a combination they could. But the farmers will not combine.<br />

50726. About malting in bond, do you know <strong>of</strong> your own knowledge whether there is any colonial<br />

barley or malt exported ?-0£ my own knowledge I cannot answer you, it is only hearsay.<br />

50727. By the ChaiTman.-Have you any statement to make to the Commission ?-I heard you ask<br />

:M:r. Gralmm about farming implemencs and the dnty upon farming implements. As a farmer, I am quite in<br />

favour <strong>of</strong> a duty being retained upon all agricultural implements that ea.n be manufactured in the colony ;<br />

but what we cannot manufactme or produce, I tbink ought to come in as free as possible, except for revenue<br />

purposes. I do not speak upon that subject authoritatively, but I think the agriculturalists prefer the colonial<br />

implements to the imported, aml they would not have the imported at a gift. I gave £26 for a plough no later<br />

than Tuesday last. I would add that upon my 320 acres, <strong>of</strong> which I cultivate 230 acres; I employ an average<br />

<strong>of</strong> nine men per week per annum. Each and every one <strong>of</strong> those men pays through the Cnstom-house and<br />

contributes to the revenue <strong>of</strong> the colony. You can go here and see twenty square miles, not very far from<br />

here, with one man per week per annum.<br />

50728. By 1Jf1·. JJ1cintyre.-What wages do you pay the nine men upon the farm ?-They vary ; £1<br />

a week and their food, and 17s. a week and their food.<br />

50729. None less than I7s.?-No.<br />

50730. Then the average is about 18s. Gd. a week ?-About that.<br />

50731. By Nr. llfunro.-Have you any scarcity <strong>of</strong> labour?-No, but labour has not been so<br />

plentiful as it was some years ago. I really think we could very well afford to introduce some more labour,<br />

but I have no scarcity ; it greatly depends upon how the farmer treats his men.<br />

50732. Then you would be in favour <strong>of</strong> immigration ?-Individually I would be, although I have<br />

had no scarcity.<br />

50733. But you would have no objection to immigration?-Personally none. I think we want population.<br />

T!te ~vitness withdrew.<br />

Willlmn Wllson,<br />

E•q.,<br />

12tll :Mny lS89,<br />

William Wilson, Esq., President <strong>of</strong> the Shire <strong>of</strong> Romsey, sworn and examiuetl.<br />

50734. By tho ClbaiTman.-What are you ?-A farmer and grazier.<br />

50735. How many acres does your holding contain ?-Over 1,200 altogether.<br />

50736. How many do you cultivate ?-I average from 80 to 120.<br />

50737. Say lOO-what do you grow principally ?-The general erops that the other gentlemen grow,<br />

oats, pease, barley, and potatoes.<br />

50738. What use do you put the rest <strong>of</strong> the land to ?-Grazing and dairying.<br />

50739. You heard the evidence <strong>of</strong> the previous witnesses ?-I did not hear all Mr. Graham's; I<br />

heard Mr. Galbraith's.<br />

50740. And a portion <strong>of</strong> Mr. Graham's?-Yes.<br />

50741. Have you anything to add to the information t.hose gentlemen gave us ?-As regards the<br />

average upon oats from ten years I calculate the average at 28 bushels to the acre.<br />

50742. That is from ten years <strong>of</strong> your own experience?-Yes.<br />

50743. Is vour land rented or freehold ?-I have one block rented from Government. Of course I<br />

pay them 2s. an a~re until it is cleared, and I have a block rented that belongs to my wife's father, but it is<br />

tt private arrangement ; it is a very small rental and I may call it freehold.<br />

50744. Do you get 320 acres from the Government ?-No, it is only 144.<br />

50745. That is included in the 1,200 acres it is over 1,200.<br />

5074G. Is it part <strong>of</strong> the 144 acres that yon cultivate ?-No.<br />

507-±7. Did the previous witnesses leave unstated anything that you think it is material to say in the<br />

interests <strong>of</strong> the farmers iu this Llistrict l-~No, I did not remark anything at the time that I would add to<br />

their evidence.<br />

50748. Nothing that you would disagree with ?-No.<br />

50749. Then I may say that you agree with the evidence <strong>of</strong> the previous witnesses ?-In<br />

general.<br />

50750. In relation to the operation <strong>of</strong> the tariff, and the necessity for retaining the duties ?­<br />

Yes, by all means. I would add, that in calcnlating what it actually costs us to produce an acre <strong>of</strong> crops<br />

there are hundreds <strong>of</strong> items that we cannot take into consideration.<br />

50751. By M1·. llfclntyre.-How long have you been f[~rmiug in this country ?-Twenty-one years.<br />

I would place the estimate <strong>of</strong> growi11g an acre higher than any <strong>of</strong> the other witnesses did ; I think they<br />

are below the estimate.<br />

50752. Y on have been twenty-one years growing crops here-how many acres dill you st>wt with<br />

as farmer and grazier ?-One hundred and sixty.<br />

50753. And you have gradually in·creased your holding to 1,200 acres, less 144 that you lease from<br />

the Crown ?-There is 220 acres <strong>of</strong> that thfl.t do not belong to me by right.<br />

50754, That is 364 acres <strong>of</strong>f the 1,200-is that eo ?-Yes,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!