Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria
Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria
Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
John Burst,<br />
Esq.,J.P.,<br />
continued,<br />
12th May 1883.<br />
1506<br />
50838. Have you any idea whether protection caused those implement factories to be started or not?<br />
-I dare say it has caused some <strong>of</strong> them, but it has not caused all <strong>of</strong> them. I knew important factories before<br />
the tariff was put on, and <strong>of</strong> course they started umler free-trade; the others have started since, so I can<br />
scarcely answer that question.<br />
50839. As a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, take the reaping machine, do you know whether the reaping machine is<br />
not sold now for a little over half what it was before the duty was on ?-I know that such is the fact.<br />
50840. The world is 5,000 years old, according to some people; but until we made those machines,<br />
we did not get cheap reaping machines ?-That has nothing to do with it.<br />
50841. By lvlr. Mclntyre.-Your business is essentially that <strong>of</strong> a dairyman ?-Principally so.<br />
50842. You make butter and cheese ?-I make butter and cheese. -<br />
50843. And though the system <strong>of</strong> taxation in this country gives you 2d. a lb. upon your production,<br />
you do not desire to keep that tax ?-I desire to see it abolished. What good can it possibly do me when<br />
we are exporting 2,000,000 lbs. weight per annum?<br />
50844. If through this system <strong>of</strong> taxation 2d. a lb. has been put on in Sydney and Adelaide and you<br />
only get the price less 2d. a lb. that the local producer regulates ; but if the tax were taken <strong>of</strong>f, you would<br />
get nearly all that 2d. ?-Not all, but a great portion <strong>of</strong> it.<br />
50845. And the people there would get the benefit <strong>of</strong> the greater supply which you would send there?<br />
-Yes.<br />
50846. Do you produce any bacon ?-~L\. little ; but it is all consumed in the colony.<br />
50847. You do not desire to continue the tax upon bacon, do you ?-I desire no taxes whatever,<br />
except for revenue purposes.<br />
50848. You have got 2,000 acres?-Yes ; it is not all my own.<br />
50849. How much <strong>of</strong> it is freehold ?-Sixteen hundred acres.<br />
50850. How long have you been in this neighbourhood ?-Twenty-three years.<br />
50851. How many acres did you start with ?-Seventy-eight.<br />
50852. And you have gradually increased your land until you have got this large acreage now?-Yes.<br />
50853. You employ a number <strong>of</strong> men, do not you ?-No, I think about eight-that is six men<br />
and two girls. -<br />
50854. Are those employed about the dairy business ?-Yes, dairy and farm, but principally dairy.<br />
50855. How do you pay your dairy people ?-I pay them from 12s. to £1 a week.<br />
50856. A little less than farm labourers, who get from, say from 17s. 6d. to £1 a week and are<br />
found ?-Yes.<br />
50857. Is a large area <strong>of</strong> this land fit for cultivation?-Yes.<br />
50858. How many out <strong>of</strong> the 1,600 acres are your own ?-I think from 600 to 800.<br />
50859. And you find a dairy to be the best paying purpose you can turn it to; is that so ?-No; I<br />
worked the dairy at a considerable loss during the cheap period <strong>of</strong> three years, which ended two years.<br />
50860. When you were working at a loss did you hold the same opinion as you do now ?-Yes,<br />
because <strong>of</strong> my loss.<br />
50861. May I ask why you do not turn any portion <strong>of</strong> your farm to growing oats, which are so highly<br />
protected by the State ?-Yes, for one thing there is a very great scarcity <strong>of</strong> labour, at least we feel it so.<br />
As for the people living here in Lancefield, <strong>of</strong> course the labourers in the colony at the harvest :flock to<br />
them, but we people living at the outside must do the best we can for labour.<br />
50862. If you had cheap labour would you turn part <strong>of</strong> your land to oat-growing and other cereals ?<br />
Yes, certainly.<br />
50863. Do you mean cheap labour or more <strong>of</strong> it at the same price ?-I mean more <strong>of</strong> it at the same<br />
price so long as it is good labour.<br />
50864. So long as you are producing grain, would it not be to your interest to have the duty upon<br />
grain that exists now ?-I think not.<br />
50865. You would still hold your present opinion ?-Yes.<br />
50866. Bu ~fr. Longmo1e.-Would you find any want <strong>of</strong> labour if you <strong>of</strong>fered another half crown<br />
or five shillings a week, do you think ?-My calling would not afford that ; I could not compete in the<br />
market, and even then I could not get them I know.<br />
50867. Bu 11/r. Munro.-How would the removal <strong>of</strong> this 2d. a lb. duty on butter improve your<br />
position ?-I have already answered that.<br />
50868. Really I did not catch, although I have tried to follow it. I have been thinking <strong>of</strong> it since<br />
you have been speaking. Now, how does this 2d. a lb. affect you; you are not charged with it ?-I will try<br />
to make it clear. Suppose butter is 4d. a lb. here, suppose it is 8d. a lb. in Sydney, then <strong>of</strong> course there is<br />
a market in Sydney for our butter. We want to send it over and obtain that 8d. a lb., but in consequence<br />
<strong>of</strong> there being 2d. a lb. duty it is only 6d. to us, consequently we should be losing the 2d.<br />
50869. But you sell the butter here ?-But there would be a larger demand for it through the<br />
merchants, who would get something out <strong>of</strong> it and would certainly buy it. It is as plain as possible, I do<br />
not know that I could make it plainer.<br />
50870. Then you are in favour <strong>of</strong> immigration ?-I am in favour <strong>of</strong> immigration certainly-family<br />
immigration-it is a thing that will be needed for a very long time.<br />
50i371. Assisted immigration ?--.Just such as we had twelve, fourteen, and sixteen years ago.<br />
50872. You are aware that Queensland has a duty upon butter, too ?-Yes.<br />
50873. And New South Wales ?-I am not sure.<br />
50874. Bu Mr. Woods.-! think I understood you to say that your business is principally dairyfarming<br />
?-Yes.<br />
50875. So that the duties upon cereals are a matter <strong>of</strong> perfect indifference to you ?-No, certainly not.<br />
50876. In what wa.y?-Simply because I m.ay at any season, whenever I see it would pay better<br />
than dairying, begin to cultivate more largely.<br />
50877. And in that case you would like to see the duty removed ?-And in that case I would like<br />
to see the duty removed for this one thing, that it would balance the markets. Now, if we overstoclc--<br />
50878: Never mind the argument-you say you would like to see it removed.?-Yes.<br />
50879. You would like to see New Zealand oats come into competition with your oats 7-Yes.<br />
50880. You can compete with them in the open market in Melbourne ?-Yes, I think so.