15.05.2014 Views

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Edwar~White,<br />

1460<br />

49339. You want a fixed duty <strong>of</strong> ls. tl, dozen upon the pints and 6cl. upon the half-pints?-That<br />

sr~~;'~sa.: would be about 20 per cent. A shilling upon reputed half-pints and 2s. for reputed pints, and quarts in<br />

proportion ; thnt is what we want.<br />

493,10. Whe~t is the wholesale price <strong>of</strong> the reputeclhttll'-pints ?-Colonial?<br />

49341. No, imported ?-I could harclly tell you Lea and Perrin'.s.<br />

49342. Leaving those out, as exceptionally high in price, you say ?-About 4s.; 3s. 6d. to 4s. 6d.<br />

49343. Then if you say la. upon that that is 25 per cent. only, and you get 20 per cent. now?-<br />

At the present time several :English sauces are being sold as low as that; but you ask the average English<br />

price, I say 3s. 6d., ancl there are others very much lower even than that.<br />

49344. Still you get 20 per cent. upon the lower priced article, that is more in proportion than upon<br />

the higher priced one ?-Twenty per cent. is not equal to ls. a dozen,<br />

49345. No, but it is upon the lower price, so that the duty is just ns much in proportion as it is in<br />

the other case. What is the price <strong>of</strong> the colonial?-The same, 4s. ; 3s. 6d. to 4s. 6cl.<br />

49346. Have you anything else to say ?-No, that is all.<br />

The toitness witltdrew.<br />

Adjourned to Tuesda.IJ next, at Ttvo o'clock.<br />

Dav!d Gibson,<br />

Sth May 1883.<br />

TUESDAY, 8TH :MAY, 1883.<br />

Present:<br />

JA:!I:LES MrRAMs;Esq., M.L.A., in the Chair;<br />

J. Bo,;;isto Esq., ML.A., The Hon. G. JVIeares, M.L.C.,<br />

W. J. Lobb, Esq., W. F. Walker, Esq., M.L.A.,<br />

The Hon. ,J. Lorimer, M.L.C.,<br />

E. L. Zox, Esq., M.L.A.<br />

J. Mcintyre, Esq., M.L.A.,<br />

GRAIN, FLOUR, RICE, ETC.<br />

David Gibson sworn aud examined.<br />

49347. By tlte Chairman.-What are you ?-I am a miller in Carlton.<br />

49348. Has it been long established ?-That is the oldest established mill in the colony. It was<br />

originally established by Mr. John Dight.<br />

49349. I have a letter from Mr. Gibson, dated 27th <strong>of</strong> the 5th month 1!:'82, asking an opportunity<br />

<strong>of</strong> giving evidence before the Commission on the question <strong>of</strong> the duty upon milling machinery ?­<br />

Yes.<br />

49350. ls the Commiss10n to understand that that is the only item you wish to bring under their<br />

notice ?-No; I wish to bring under their notice other items, and also the tariff upon grain generallywe<br />

want it swept all away. I want to be heard upon that point. '<br />

49351. As to the material you manipulate-that is the grain-what is your opinion in relation to<br />

the tariff upon that ?~There is a duty now <strong>of</strong> 2s. a bushel upon wheat, and the fanners themselves complain<br />

that they cannot get any seed wheat to have ~• variation <strong>of</strong> seed. It does not affect us personally<br />

to pay 2s. a bi1shel, because the price in London rules the price in the colony at present.<br />

49352. It is 2s. a cental, is it not?~ Yes. I beg your pardon, we always calculate by the bushel.<br />

The duty does not affect the colony in any way, as the London market now rules our market<br />

here.<br />

49353. For wheat ?-For wheat. I am speaking simply <strong>of</strong> wheat now and flour, and we are<br />

charged now 27i per cent. upon all our imported patent machinery that cannot be produced in the<br />

colonv.<br />

• 49354. Now you are going from the material to the machinery ?-Yes, l am finished with<br />

material.<br />

49355. Let us keep to the one article first-yott propose the abolition <strong>of</strong> the 2s. cental upon<br />

wheat?-Yes.<br />

49356. You do that upon tho grouml that our produce has outstepped our demands and that we<br />

are an exporting country in regard to wheat?-Y os.<br />

49357. The price being ruled by the London market and not here ?-By the European markets.<br />

49358. I also understand it upon the ground <strong>of</strong> the admission <strong>of</strong> varieties <strong>of</strong> seed wheat, without<br />

paying duty?-If the duty were swept away we shorud have t.he opportunity <strong>of</strong> getting varieties <strong>of</strong> seed<br />

wheat in which we cannot get now.<br />

49359. Do the growers <strong>of</strong> wheat coincide with ymt in that opinion ?-The growers <strong>of</strong> whent coincide<br />

with me in that opi11ion as fm· as I have spoken to them, because it produces a better quality and they get<br />

more <strong>of</strong> it by a change <strong>of</strong> seed. ·<br />

49360. Those are the two grounds upon which you advocate the remission <strong>of</strong> thE;J duty upon wheat?<br />

-Yes.<br />

49361. Have you anything to say about the duty upon other cereals ?-I have nothing particular to<br />

say about them; I considel' them a great hardship.<br />

49362. Do you deal in them?-Yes, in oats an cl barley principally; I have made no pearl barley in<br />

bond, only oatmeal.<br />

49363. You can clo that in bond ?-I can do that in bond.<br />

49364. So it does not affect you in that respect ?-So it does not affect me in that respect, but I<br />

should like to see the whole duty swept <strong>of</strong>f.<br />

49365. Now about the improvements and machinery, what have you to say ?-I will show yott a<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> flour. I luove erected a large plant and I have brought a sample <strong>of</strong> flour. This :flour is worth 4s.<br />

a bag more than flour made in ordinary stones, consequently you see the enhanceil cost <strong>of</strong> it by the duty.<br />

49366. Thost: are all the same snmples ?-No, they are different samples. One is made by the<br />

patent machinery, an cl the other is made by the stones--[ the witness produced and !tanded in the samples].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!