15.05.2014 Views

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1451<br />

49028. But also the value?-Yes ; the true value is not there, am! that falsifies our account <strong>of</strong> J. P. Goutstone.<br />

continued, ·<br />

exportations. Srcl Mn.y 1883.<br />

49029. How coul1l that be rectified-what menus have the Customs <strong>of</strong> knowing the true value?-<br />

Thev have no means <strong>of</strong> checking it.<br />

" · 49030. Except they compel the exporters to prolluee t.he invoice:'\ ?-If they matle them, in the<br />

decbratiou for export, declare that the value was a correct one as well as Lleclaring that those goods were<br />

not the produce <strong>of</strong> <strong>Victoria</strong>, I think that might apply.<br />

49031. For the year 1881-that is the last year for which I have a fnll record-the total weight <strong>of</strong><br />

tea put down as exported is 4,111,838 lbs., and the valne pnt opposite to that is £292,606, equal to nearly<br />

ls. 6d. a pound ; now, in your opinion, that tea w>ts not worth >tnything like so much as £292,000 ?-It would<br />

not be worth anything like two-thirds <strong>of</strong> that money, tnkiug the avemge <strong>of</strong> the imports <strong>of</strong> tea into this<br />

colony.<br />

49032. By Mr. Mclntyre.-Just follow that up. What object can the exporters have in overvaluing<br />

these articles ?-Nothing more than to exhibit they are doing a very large trade in really fine-class<br />

teas, which is not the case.<br />

49033. But does it affect any one in the community, that they should please themselves by this?­<br />

I do not know that it does, except that it is merely an adverti.'!ement to the local grocer to a certain extent.<br />

The Customs returns, <strong>of</strong> course, >tre reliable as to weight, but, I think, anybody in the trade here would<br />

know that average <strong>of</strong> our tea exported does not reach ls., let alone l s. 6d. a pound, upon the average.<br />

49034. Then the colony would not stand so high in the export list ?-Not in tea, at any rate.<br />

49035. ~What is your ide>t in regard to a reduction <strong>of</strong> the duties upon te>t-wonld a reduction benefit<br />

you in business ?-It would le>tve us fJ;.Ce, in all senses, to work.<br />

49036. What do you mean by that '1-0f course we should be free <strong>of</strong> h>tving to >tdnnce money for<br />

duties in the first place. In the second place, as to blenders and packers, we should be able to blend<br />

through the whole house, whereas the trade now are rather doubtful <strong>of</strong> anything unless it is delivered<br />

stmight from bond. ~ ~<br />

49037. If" reduction in duty were nmde would the public get the benefit <strong>of</strong> it ?-Judging from<br />

experience, when the last 3d. a pound was taken <strong>of</strong>f, I say decidedly not. I think the grocers' pr<strong>of</strong>its on<br />

tea,, to-clay, are very considerably in adYance <strong>of</strong> wlmt they were before the duties were taken <strong>of</strong>f. I do not<br />

think the consmners got one fraction <strong>of</strong> benefit from it.<br />

49038. vVhat was tile buaiuess <strong>of</strong> this remark. Your business consists <strong>of</strong> "what we call blending<br />

and packing under recognised brands." Now, by blending, the Commission understands a mixing <strong>of</strong> lots<br />

<strong>of</strong> clitierent teas, grown in different places ?-Yes.<br />

4!)039. As to any one here importing the article from those places direct, I can tmderstand it, but<br />

what; do you mean by "packing under recognised Lrands." Do you brand the article you blend here as the<br />

Oriental Tea Company's JYiixtm·e, :Melbourne ?-We brand it as either "Roy>t! Blend," "Standard,"<br />

" Challenge," or " Universal,'' as the case may be.<br />

4!)040. Is there a company outside the colony that you are aware <strong>of</strong>?-N o.<br />

49041. Then the sole business <strong>of</strong> the company is to import tea here >tml to blend it here. Why cla<br />

not they say that the operation takes place in Melbourne ?-All onr advertisements have th!tt te:1dency.<br />

4!)042. What tendeucy ?-They have our address upon them, as the central place <strong>of</strong> blendmg for the<br />

colonies.<br />

49043. Does not the packing case convey the ide>t to the puLlic that they are imported in the shape<br />

that they sec them ?-No, the package is totally different from the imported case in every way-that is<br />

both the wrapper and the package.<br />

4!)04±. Are those brauds known in the home market ?-No, they are known where we intro(luce<br />

them only. ·<br />

49045. They are your own brands ?-They are our own brands, registered.<br />

49046. There is no imitation <strong>of</strong> any brands ?-There is no imitation <strong>of</strong> any brands. We guarantee<br />

those brands as being up to st>tndard qualities.<br />

49047. And it is recognised then, throughout the trade now, 'ohat a certain brand upon one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Oriental tea chests, conveys a certain class <strong>of</strong> tea to them 7-It does. It is known all through <strong>Victoria</strong><br />

tlmt the "Univers!tl" tea is the accepted 2s. mixture.<br />

49048. Have you any trouble in denling with the midtlle men <strong>of</strong> the colony ?-Decidedly, a great deal<br />

with the grocers.<br />

49049. What is the n>tture <strong>of</strong> the trouble ?-They give various grouuds for it.<br />

49050. But what is the trouble in the first place ?-If they <strong>of</strong>fered our known brands and people<br />

came to like them and to know them, there is nothing to prevent a greengrocer, or a baker, or anyone else<br />

supplying them as well as the grocer·. Then, secondly, they say we do not allow them a sufficient margin<br />

<strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it between our fixetl price and their distributing prices, although it varies from 25 to 33 per cent.<br />

49051. Do they put obstacles in the way <strong>of</strong> your distribution?-Yes, and in very peculiar ways in<br />

some cases.<br />

49052. By that means yon do not get your brands into the general grocers' hands at all?-We get a<br />

good few <strong>of</strong> them. We may have, in <strong>Victoria</strong>, 300 or !lOO customers, but we cannot them into the hands<br />

<strong>of</strong> the large grocers, because they say, " We must get our own article into onr customers' hands. We<br />

should lose our distinctive character as grocers ifwe sell yonr teas." I may say th>tt 99 out <strong>of</strong> 100 storekeepers<br />

in the colony are not grocers, they have not been brot1ght up to the t-rade and they know nothing <strong>of</strong><br />

tea blending, and their idea <strong>of</strong> what teas should go together is very snmll indeed.<br />

49053. Do you convey the idea that most grocers wish to Llend their teas themselves ?-Yes,<br />

they clo.<br />

49054. Is that the reason they do not want to use your blends ?-They clo not object to buy them<br />

in bulk. In fact I have known them to bny our packet teas and pull onr wrappers <strong>of</strong>f and put their own on.<br />

49055. And u!le your tea ?-And use our tea. ,<br />

49056. Could there Le any way <strong>of</strong> stopping that interference with your particular L11siness ?-We<br />

cannot, because if they choose to buy our te>t and open it, we c>tnnot stop them.<br />

49057. But if the public is deceivetl, they mny not, get so good a blend as you give thOln ?-We have<br />

l19 me!tllfl <strong>of</strong> stopping it, lmt if they falsify our brands we h&ve. We had two cases where some parties

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!