Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria
Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria
Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1461<br />
49367. I understand that you show these samples <strong>of</strong> flour in ordel' to prove the difference in the<br />
value and the fineness <strong>of</strong> the flour manufactured by the patent machinery <strong>of</strong> which you speak ?-Yes.<br />
49368. And flom made by the ordinary millstones ?-Yes.<br />
49369. I have numbered the samples No. 1, No. '2, and No. 3. Ne. 1, you say, is the result <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patent machinery, awl Nos. 2 and 3 are the samples from the ortlinary machinery?-Yes.<br />
49370. What is the difference in the value <strong>of</strong> these different flours ?-The difference in the value <strong>of</strong><br />
the patent flour from America is 4s. a bag in London. From Italy and Buda-Pesth, where they originally<br />
introduced the roller mills, there is a difference <strong>of</strong> 9s. a sack. Before they star~ed this patent machinery<br />
their flour commanded in London the ordinary price.<br />
4D371. You have this machinery in use now ?-Yes.<br />
49372. Have you experienced the value <strong>of</strong> the enhanced value ?-Yes.<br />
49373, And you object, I understand, to the duty which you had to pay upon this machine?-Yes,<br />
2H per cent.<br />
49374. What was the cost <strong>of</strong> the machinery you imported ?-It costs altogether upwarLls <strong>of</strong> £4,000<br />
before it started.<br />
49375. About £4,000 ?-Upwards <strong>of</strong> £A,OOO.<br />
4937G. You tell us this is a patent ?-It is not a patent in the colony, it is a patent in Hungary.<br />
49377. The patent (loes not extend to this country ?-The patent does not extend t.o this country.<br />
49378. Then if we introduce a regulation by which all patent machinery should be admitted free, it<br />
would not touch this case ?-It is patent where it is exported from, but it is not a patent here.<br />
4\}379. Then under a regulation by which all patent machinery, for whatever purpose it is made<br />
and whatever trade used, it should be admitted free, this would come in free ?-I expect iL would.<br />
49380. Have you anything further to add ?-I have this to add, tlmt we have to compete with the<br />
neighbouring colonies. Everything we handle in our mill is taxed. Onr belts are taxed, which eomes to a<br />
large qmmtity <strong>of</strong> money. Our cornsacks are heavily taxed, all our macl1inery, in fact everythiug we touch<br />
is taxed. Across the Border, in New South \Vales, or South Australia, everything comes in free, bags are<br />
half the mouev.<br />
4938l:Not in New South Wales, are the same there?-Yes, but they are half in South<br />
Australia, and machinery comes in free.<br />
49382. Not rnachinery in South Australia ?-It is<br />
Now we have all this to contend with, which is very unjust<br />
markets with them.<br />
small if anything, but in Sydney it is free.<br />
contend, because we have to compete in the<br />
49383. Which markets ?-Sydney ami Queensland ; we send flour to all those markets.<br />
49384. Are you able to compete with them there successfully to any exten~ ?-We have to compete<br />
with them ; but om· protits, as manufacturers, must be reduced to that extent.<br />
49385. Can you give the Commission any statement <strong>of</strong> the portion <strong>of</strong> your outlay upon t,_hese articles<br />
that you have enumerated, and which pay duty-what proportion does it bear to the value <strong>of</strong> your yearly<br />
out~put ?-I have not gone into the thing so minutely as that.<br />
49386. You see, that in order for us to come to an opinion as to how far these taxes are a burden<br />
upon you, and reduce your pr<strong>of</strong>its, it is neeessary for us to know what is the value <strong>of</strong> your year's business,<br />
and what is the value <strong>of</strong> the outlay upon these articles-for instance, what does oil co;;t ?-Oil costs about a<br />
couple <strong>of</strong> pounds a week.<br />
49387. And the duty is 20 per cent. upon it, is it not ?-About 20 per cent.<br />
Mr. Drysdale.-Twelve and a half per cent.<br />
The fFttness.-Theu there is our bagging. We use about a thousand ba.gs a week. We pay Is. net,<br />
and the Adelaide people pay 6d.<br />
49388. You would hn.ve to pay Is. in New South Wales, the same as here ?-Yes ; but the Adelaide<br />
people have that advantage. If I use a thousand bags <strong>of</strong> wheat they have the aclvant!tge <strong>of</strong> paying only<br />
half what I pay.<br />
49389. You do an export trade ?-Yes.<br />
49390. Do you find any difficulty in dealing with the Customs under the drawback regulations?<br />
We get no drawback.<br />
49391. You manipulate in bond, <strong>of</strong> course ?-Yes ; the oatmeal is sent away in bond, and flour is<br />
upon the free list.<br />
- 49392. So you have no trouble in that ?-We have no trouble in that whatever.<br />
49393. The tariff then cloes not interfere with yom· export trade, more than to rednce certain<br />
amounts <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it to you in the direction you spoke <strong>of</strong>?-Yes.<br />
49394. By .11fT. Bosisto.-In reference to a statement made here the other clay, about pollard or<br />
sharps, does the patent process make pollard or slmrps <strong>of</strong> a quality that would make ordinary ship's<br />
biscuits ?-I may tell you that the millers <strong>of</strong> Melbourne are ahead <strong>of</strong> the millers in the neighbouring<br />
colonies. 1 suppose they are more energetic men. Five years >tgo I was in London, aml I importecl a<br />
purifier, as they call it. When we m!l.ke pollarcl we put it into the purifier, and it takes away all the light<br />
fluffy kernel f1·om it, and leaves nothing but the pure wheat, aml it makes flour equal to the first wheat,<br />
that is the reason there is none to sell in the colony. Vife have now nearly all got purifiers, and we convert<br />
it into flom.<br />
49395. So in point <strong>of</strong> fact that kind <strong>of</strong> pollard will not do for biscuit bakers?-We find it more<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itable to make it into flour than to sell it to the biscuit bakers. Our improved machinery has done<br />
away with that kind <strong>of</strong> pollard or nearly so.<br />
49396. By the Hon. J.Wr. Lorimer.-Theu if the duty were abolished upon pollard it woulLl not<br />
injnre the millers ?-Not a bit.<br />
49397. You have no objection ?-The millers are not frightened <strong>of</strong> anything <strong>of</strong> that kind.<br />
49398. As to the competition in which you are at a disadva.ntage in foreign mm·kets, I think in<br />
answer to the Chairman you simply talked about Sydney ?-I say Sycln13y and Queensland.<br />
49399. You export flour to London also, do not you ?-Yes.<br />
49400. It will be the largest market I suppose in the future ?-Yes, I suppose it will.<br />
49401. So that this h:J.ndicapping by a duty puts you at a clisadv:J.ntage in competing with South<br />
Australia at I"onclon ?-Yes, ~mcl it also keeps the patent mnchines out· <strong>of</strong> the colony ; you can put your<br />
Da.vhl Oibson 1<br />
conliJlued,<br />
Stll May 1883,