15.05.2014 Views

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

.r. P. G?ulstune, were pack;ng nncler the "Orient Tea Companv'' bnand ; we stopped t.hem; and another person who put<br />

zr~ 0 :f~~uf~im. them under our " Challenge'' and "Stamlard''lJrauds, npon our bringing them before the party who was<br />

packilJg them, he at once stopped it.<br />

-19058. Is your trade increttsing ?-It io greatly increasing, though since we st.arted I cannot tell you<br />

how many rival firms have st.arted packing, nncl others buy teas from Chinn packed there. But the trade<br />

has gmdnally increased, last yettr more especially QUl' trade increased a good 25 per cent.<br />

49059. Are there a number <strong>of</strong> tea blenders in the city ?-Yes, a number now, but none npou the<br />

same principle as onrsel ves. vV e select teas to suit our brands, but I think the majority merely pack wh!;tt<br />

suits their stocks.<br />

49060. By JYfr. Grimwade.-As to passing those entries and pHtting the incorrect value upon them,<br />

are you not liable to a fine ?-No, not at all, the Customs ha.ve no control ovet· it. They only recognise<br />

the quantity <strong>of</strong> toa at a fixed rate <strong>of</strong> duty. '<br />

49061. In passing entries <strong>of</strong> other things, if you pass them at a wrong value, you are liable to a<br />

penalty?-That is in importing.<br />

49062. Or exporting ; is not that so, Mr. Drysdale? If you overvalue, either carelessly or intentionally,<br />

are you not liable to a fine ?-(Mr. Drtjsdale )-I do not know that you are, but the clerk has to be<br />

careful in getting the val!le.<br />

49063. B.t! the Chai1·man.-Bnt if the duty had been an ad valorem and the drawback were<br />

according to valu3, you would. have to mo,ke a declaration according to value?-Yes, but it is only upon the<br />

qnantity.<br />

49064. Does that apply only to import ?-It applies both to drawback and to expm"t entries.<br />

49065. B!l the Hon. Jrfr. Lorime1·.-I see there is a penalty•for false declaration, and I see upon the<br />

baek <strong>of</strong> the entry it is plain that the value is part <strong>of</strong> the declaration T!te witness)-! do not think the<br />

value is part <strong>of</strong> the declaration.<br />

49066. Bp Mr. Jffcintyre.-There is the penalty <strong>of</strong> perjury ?-But there is no penalty in this case.<br />

There is a form <strong>of</strong> declaration upon the back <strong>of</strong> the export entry.<br />

49067. B,.J the Hon. Mr. Lorime1·.-Yon have had large experience as a tea merchant, have you<br />

not ?-I have been engaged in the. trade now about twenty-seven or twenty-eight years.<br />

49068. In the direct trade as well as in the mixing business both.<br />

49069. Selling original packages ?-Yes.<br />

49070. Can you give us your views as to whether the public are better protected with a duty upon<br />

the ten,, with Customs supervision attendant on the duty, or if it were altogether free?-With regard to<br />

teas, I think they are very much better protected by the Customs.<br />

49071. Will you explain the practice, when tea is bonded, with regard to weights ?-Generally they<br />

take a percentage <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> packages forming a line, then m1lculate the gross and tare, and take the<br />

average.<br />

49072. And that is maue out upon the certificates ?-Yes.<br />

49073. Then the tea being sold in bond, the public are protected by the weights upon the certificates?<br />

-They are.<br />

49074. Is it not a fact that the trade generally prefer a duty on that account ; it prevents dispute?<br />

-They do.<br />

49075. The weights arc guaranteed by the Customs supervision ?-That might apply more<br />

especially to China packages, which are pretty nearly <strong>of</strong> an average weight in a break; but with Indian<br />

packages, in the same parcel, even if it is only a matter <strong>of</strong> twenty chests from a garden, I have found<br />

them to vary from twelve to twenty pounds in the weight <strong>of</strong> a package. ·<br />

49076. Do not you think the risk <strong>of</strong> adnlteration would he also increased if there were no duty?­<br />

I do not think it. In the time I have been in business in the colony, except in the early times,Ihaveseen<br />

very little adulteration; some came in black tea.<br />

49077. But after it has come in-after it gets out <strong>of</strong> bond ?-I do not see how it is to be do1,1e.<br />

49078. A grocer could do it ?-I do not know by whttt means.<br />

49079. It is impossible for the wholesale merchant to do it just now, under the existing plan?­<br />

I think it is as possible for him as for the grocer.<br />

49080. How could he do it ?-That is what I say, I do not know how it could be done.<br />

49081. If a man had it in his warehouse would not some system <strong>of</strong> adulteration be possible by<br />

mixing ?-Mixing is not aclnlLeration. Aucl if you sell a mixed tea, and are dealing fairly with a man, you<br />

sell by a sample <strong>of</strong> the mixture. As a rule tea is sold by sample, and you bny the mixed sample <strong>of</strong> tea.<br />

It is done, I believe, in the city-that merchants' packages are used for refilling again, and that a commoner<br />

tea may go out in a package that has conveyed, to this port, a very much finer quality <strong>of</strong> tea. For<br />

instance, I may say that ten may be imported by a house here at a cost <strong>of</strong> 2s. a pound, well known in the<br />

market as a :first crop tea, and those packages would be refilled by a commoner tea, and sent out as first<br />

crop tea.<br />

49082. vVould not thnt be much easier to do if there were no Customs supervision ?-The amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> that done, I think, would be very small.<br />

49083. Would not the plan <strong>of</strong> free tea facilitate it ?-I do not think that it would-it might possibly<br />

-but I do not think it would be done that way. · ·<br />

1452<br />

Tlte witness withdrew.<br />

.rohn Whiting,<br />

3rdMay 1883,<br />

John Whiting sworn and examined •<br />

49084. By the Cl1ai1·man.-What are you ?-Importer.<br />

49085. Of tea ?-Of teas and oilmen's stores.<br />

49086. Tea is t.he question we are on just at the present moment. Did you hear the evidence <strong>of</strong> Mr.<br />

Goulstone ?-Yes.<br />

49087. Have yott anything further to add to the eviclence he has given ?-I agree v,1th very much<br />

that Mr. Goulstone stated. I have a very decided opinion that to remove the duty from tea woulll be in<br />

many ways injuriocts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!