Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria
Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria
Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
.r. P. G?ulstune, were pack;ng nncler the "Orient Tea Companv'' bnand ; we stopped t.hem; and another person who put<br />
zr~ 0 :f~~uf~im. them under our " Challenge'' and "Stamlard''lJrauds, npon our bringing them before the party who was<br />
packilJg them, he at once stopped it.<br />
-19058. Is your trade increttsing ?-It io greatly increasing, though since we st.arted I cannot tell you<br />
how many rival firms have st.arted packing, nncl others buy teas from Chinn packed there. But the trade<br />
has gmdnally increased, last yettr more especially QUl' trade increased a good 25 per cent.<br />
49059. Are there a number <strong>of</strong> tea blenders in the city ?-Yes, a number now, but none npou the<br />
same principle as onrsel ves. vV e select teas to suit our brands, but I think the majority merely pack wh!;tt<br />
suits their stocks.<br />
49060. By JYfr. Grimwade.-As to passing those entries and pHtting the incorrect value upon them,<br />
are you not liable to a fine ?-No, not at all, the Customs ha.ve no control ovet· it. They only recognise<br />
the quantity <strong>of</strong> toa at a fixed rate <strong>of</strong> duty. '<br />
49061. In passing entries <strong>of</strong> other things, if you pass them at a wrong value, you are liable to a<br />
penalty?-That is in importing.<br />
49062. Or exporting ; is not that so, Mr. Drysdale? If you overvalue, either carelessly or intentionally,<br />
are you not liable to a fine ?-(Mr. Drtjsdale )-I do not know that you are, but the clerk has to be<br />
careful in getting the val!le.<br />
49063. B.t! the Chai1·man.-Bnt if the duty had been an ad valorem and the drawback were<br />
according to valu3, you would. have to mo,ke a declaration according to value?-Yes, but it is only upon the<br />
qnantity.<br />
49064. Does that apply only to import ?-It applies both to drawback and to expm"t entries.<br />
49065. B!l the Hon. Jrfr. Lorime1·.-I see there is a penalty•for false declaration, and I see upon the<br />
baek <strong>of</strong> the entry it is plain that the value is part <strong>of</strong> the declaration T!te witness)-! do not think the<br />
value is part <strong>of</strong> the declaration.<br />
49066. Bp Mr. Jffcintyre.-There is the penalty <strong>of</strong> perjury ?-But there is no penalty in this case.<br />
There is a form <strong>of</strong> declaration upon the back <strong>of</strong> the export entry.<br />
49067. B,.J the Hon. Mr. Lorime1·.-Yon have had large experience as a tea merchant, have you<br />
not ?-I have been engaged in the. trade now about twenty-seven or twenty-eight years.<br />
49068. In the direct trade as well as in the mixing business both.<br />
49069. Selling original packages ?-Yes.<br />
49070. Can you give us your views as to whether the public are better protected with a duty upon<br />
the ten,, with Customs supervision attendant on the duty, or if it were altogether free?-With regard to<br />
teas, I think they are very much better protected by the Customs.<br />
49071. Will you explain the practice, when tea is bonded, with regard to weights ?-Generally they<br />
take a percentage <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> packages forming a line, then m1lculate the gross and tare, and take the<br />
average.<br />
49072. And that is maue out upon the certificates ?-Yes.<br />
49073. Then the tea being sold in bond, the public are protected by the weights upon the certificates?<br />
-They are.<br />
49074. Is it not a fact that the trade generally prefer a duty on that account ; it prevents dispute?<br />
-They do.<br />
49075. The weights arc guaranteed by the Customs supervision ?-That might apply more<br />
especially to China packages, which are pretty nearly <strong>of</strong> an average weight in a break; but with Indian<br />
packages, in the same parcel, even if it is only a matter <strong>of</strong> twenty chests from a garden, I have found<br />
them to vary from twelve to twenty pounds in the weight <strong>of</strong> a package. ·<br />
49076. Do not you think the risk <strong>of</strong> adnlteration would he also increased if there were no duty?<br />
I do not think it. In the time I have been in business in the colony, except in the early times,Ihaveseen<br />
very little adulteration; some came in black tea.<br />
49077. But after it has come in-after it gets out <strong>of</strong> bond ?-I do not see how it is to be do1,1e.<br />
49078. A grocer could do it ?-I do not know by whttt means.<br />
49079. It is impossible for the wholesale merchant to do it just now, under the existing plan?<br />
I think it is as possible for him as for the grocer.<br />
49080. How could he do it ?-That is what I say, I do not know how it could be done.<br />
49081. If a man had it in his warehouse would not some system <strong>of</strong> adulteration be possible by<br />
mixing ?-Mixing is not aclnlLeration. Aucl if you sell a mixed tea, and are dealing fairly with a man, you<br />
sell by a sample <strong>of</strong> the mixture. As a rule tea is sold by sample, and you bny the mixed sample <strong>of</strong> tea.<br />
It is done, I believe, in the city-that merchants' packages are used for refilling again, and that a commoner<br />
tea may go out in a package that has conveyed, to this port, a very much finer quality <strong>of</strong> tea. For<br />
instance, I may say that ten may be imported by a house here at a cost <strong>of</strong> 2s. a pound, well known in the<br />
market as a :first crop tea, and those packages would be refilled by a commoner tea, and sent out as first<br />
crop tea.<br />
49082. vVould not thnt be much easier to do if there were no Customs supervision ?-The amount<br />
<strong>of</strong> that done, I think, would be very small.<br />
49083. Would not the plan <strong>of</strong> free tea facilitate it ?-I do not think that it would-it might possibly<br />
-but I do not think it would be done that way. · ·<br />
1452<br />
Tlte witness withdrew.<br />
.rohn Whiting,<br />
3rdMay 1883,<br />
John Whiting sworn and examined •<br />
49084. By the Cl1ai1·man.-What are you ?-Importer.<br />
49085. Of tea ?-Of teas and oilmen's stores.<br />
49086. Tea is t.he question we are on just at the present moment. Did you hear the evidence <strong>of</strong> Mr.<br />
Goulstone ?-Yes.<br />
49087. Have yott anything further to add to the eviclence he has given ?-I agree v,1th very much<br />
that Mr. Goulstone stated. I have a very decided opinion that to remove the duty from tea woulll be in<br />
many ways injuriocts.