15.05.2014 Views

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1465<br />

49494. Do you think you could draw up a list <strong>of</strong> articles upon which you think the tariff ought to Thomas.Brunton,<br />

be altered ?-Yes.<br />

st~::;~sa.<br />

~ . 49495. Do you think you could send a list <strong>of</strong> such articles as the millers, as a body, desire to be<br />

altered in the tariff ?-They could be all described under the word "Rollers "-chil)ed rollers and porcelain<br />

rollers.<br />

49496. Now as to corn sacks and belting ?-I do not know that you could get belting much cheaper<br />

if the duty was <strong>of</strong>f to-morrow.<br />

49497. Do you think the millers could agree among themselves as to the list <strong>of</strong> goods that they want<br />

the duty <strong>of</strong>f ?-I do not think they could, beyond the rollers ; they would be all unanimous upon that point.<br />

You come upon the question <strong>of</strong> purifiers then, and you trench upon a vested interest here which is perfectly<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> making them.<br />

49498. I think you answered this question to Mr. Zox-if the duty was taken <strong>of</strong>f this patent<br />

machinery referred to by Mr. Gibson, would it be more extensively used in the colony ?-I think so.<br />

Whenever you have to send out flour to the world you must compete with those who send flour to a similar<br />

market.<br />

49499. I do not ask for medical evidence as to which is the best ?-Not at all, it is simply a question<br />

<strong>of</strong> opinion.<br />

49500. It is what is most saleable ?-Yes.<br />

49501. By the Chairman.-As to the machinery, I understood you to say to Mr. Zox that a machine<br />

that would be purchased in London· for £69 would cost in this colony about £140 ?-I am :not quite sure<br />

what Bodington charges for his purifiers ; it depends upon the size and the superficial surface <strong>of</strong> silk in the<br />

purifier.<br />

49502. That is about what they pay, £140 ?-Yes.<br />

49503. Why do not they import them and pay duty, for it would pay at £140 ?-They are importing<br />

them as hard as they can. A lot <strong>of</strong> purifiers came in in the last six months. Of course there are purifiers<br />

and purifiers. ·<br />

49504. By Mr. Mclntyre.-I suppose you just take the colonial article when you are obliged to?­<br />

No; that would be discrediting Mr. Bodington; he is as good a mill machinist as there is in the world.<br />

But as to rollers, they have not got the materials, and they have :not the opportunity <strong>of</strong> getting the chilled<br />

iron and porcelain.<br />

49505. By the Chairmam.-You have :nothing further to add upon that point ?-No, nothing<br />

further.<br />

49506. Those articles are still imported in large numbers now, and pay the duty ?-Yes.<br />

49507. And they only buy the colonial article at an enhanced price when there are none <strong>of</strong> the imported<br />

in the market?-Yes.<br />

The witness 'll!ithdrew..<br />

Willialli Aitkeu sworn and examined.<br />

49508. By the Chairman.-What firm do you represent ?-Aitkeu and Scott.<br />

49509. Where is your mill situated ?-In Carlton.<br />

49510. How long have you been a miller in the colony ?-Since 1854.<br />

49511. How many hands are you employing ?-I think about twenty hands.<br />

49512. Will you point out to the Commission, please, the points wherein you differ from the<br />

previous witnesses ?-It places me almost in an invidious position to do so, because Mr. Gibson and Mr.<br />

Brunton both have been importing this patent machinery, and we have got none <strong>of</strong> them, and I can only<br />

speak from my experience <strong>of</strong> the ordinary machinery. I think that the results that have been shown from<br />

the patent machinery, or almost the same results, could be got from our machinery now in operation. Mr.<br />

Brunton says our machinery is as old as Pharaoh ; I think that is an argument in its favour. If it has stood<br />

that time there must be something good in it.<br />

49513. Do I understand your evidence to go to this point, that you do not want the duty <strong>of</strong>f patent<br />

machinery ?-No.<br />

49514. The question as to which is the whiter flour is not a question for us to consider at all; our<br />

question is what you recommend in relation to the duty. The previous witnesses agree that it would be a<br />

good thing to take <strong>of</strong>f the duty upon patent machinery; do you disagree with them ?-I could not give an<br />

opinion upon that, because we can get on without it; besides which, I think the machinery could be made<br />

in the colony except some parts <strong>of</strong> it; all the rest could be made in the colony.<br />

49515. On whatever point do you differ from them ?-I would rather the Commission would ask<br />

me questions than that I should make statements.<br />

49516. I want to save your time and the time <strong>of</strong> the Commission too. I understood that you wished<br />

to be examined because you differed from the previous witnesses upon some points material to the question.<br />

If you do not differ from them, it is no use going on. However, I will ask you do you agree with the<br />

previous witnesses as to taking <strong>of</strong>f the duty on wheat ?-No, I do not.<br />

49517. Will you state to the Commission your grounds for objecting to the removal <strong>of</strong> it ?-I know<br />

as to the town millers it would be an advantage to them, but it would be much to the detriment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

farmers <strong>of</strong> this country, if the duties are taken <strong>of</strong>f.<br />

49518. If it were to the detriment <strong>of</strong> the farmers would it be to the interest <strong>of</strong> the millers ?-They<br />

are pretty nearly identicaL<br />

49519. Then would it be to the interest <strong>of</strong> the miller to have this duty taken <strong>of</strong>f?-Yes, because<br />

then :Melbourne would be a sort <strong>of</strong> emporium for the whole <strong>of</strong> the colonies-a centre to which all the grain<br />

would come to be treated. It would be good for the ::Ylelbourne merchants and millers., but it would act<br />

prejudicially to the farmers ancl country millers.<br />

'<br />

49520. Have you got any facts to support that opinion ?-The facts are these; that before there was<br />

a duty upon wheat, flour was dearer. :Flour is cheaper in Melbourne now than it was then, ancl it is<br />

cheaper in Melbourne at the present moment than in any other part <strong>of</strong> the colonies, except perhaps New<br />

Zealand.<br />

49521. Have you any opinion to express or any evidence to give in relation to the duty upon barley<br />

and oats-do you deal in those articles ttt all ?-~o, that is more a question for farmers.<br />

T.i.ntl

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!