Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria
Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria
Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1465<br />
49494. Do you think you could draw up a list <strong>of</strong> articles upon which you think the tariff ought to Thomas.Brunton,<br />
be altered ?-Yes.<br />
st~::;~sa.<br />
~ . 49495. Do you think you could send a list <strong>of</strong> such articles as the millers, as a body, desire to be<br />
altered in the tariff ?-They could be all described under the word "Rollers "-chil)ed rollers and porcelain<br />
rollers.<br />
49496. Now as to corn sacks and belting ?-I do not know that you could get belting much cheaper<br />
if the duty was <strong>of</strong>f to-morrow.<br />
49497. Do you think the millers could agree among themselves as to the list <strong>of</strong> goods that they want<br />
the duty <strong>of</strong>f ?-I do not think they could, beyond the rollers ; they would be all unanimous upon that point.<br />
You come upon the question <strong>of</strong> purifiers then, and you trench upon a vested interest here which is perfectly<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> making them.<br />
49498. I think you answered this question to Mr. Zox-if the duty was taken <strong>of</strong>f this patent<br />
machinery referred to by Mr. Gibson, would it be more extensively used in the colony ?-I think so.<br />
Whenever you have to send out flour to the world you must compete with those who send flour to a similar<br />
market.<br />
49499. I do not ask for medical evidence as to which is the best ?-Not at all, it is simply a question<br />
<strong>of</strong> opinion.<br />
49500. It is what is most saleable ?-Yes.<br />
49501. By the Chairman.-As to the machinery, I understood you to say to Mr. Zox that a machine<br />
that would be purchased in London· for £69 would cost in this colony about £140 ?-I am :not quite sure<br />
what Bodington charges for his purifiers ; it depends upon the size and the superficial surface <strong>of</strong> silk in the<br />
purifier.<br />
49502. That is about what they pay, £140 ?-Yes.<br />
49503. Why do not they import them and pay duty, for it would pay at £140 ?-They are importing<br />
them as hard as they can. A lot <strong>of</strong> purifiers came in in the last six months. Of course there are purifiers<br />
and purifiers. ·<br />
49504. By Mr. Mclntyre.-I suppose you just take the colonial article when you are obliged to?<br />
No; that would be discrediting Mr. Bodington; he is as good a mill machinist as there is in the world.<br />
But as to rollers, they have not got the materials, and they have :not the opportunity <strong>of</strong> getting the chilled<br />
iron and porcelain.<br />
49505. By the Chairmam.-You have :nothing further to add upon that point ?-No, nothing<br />
further.<br />
49506. Those articles are still imported in large numbers now, and pay the duty ?-Yes.<br />
49507. And they only buy the colonial article at an enhanced price when there are none <strong>of</strong> the imported<br />
in the market?-Yes.<br />
The witness 'll!ithdrew..<br />
Willialli Aitkeu sworn and examined.<br />
49508. By the Chairman.-What firm do you represent ?-Aitkeu and Scott.<br />
49509. Where is your mill situated ?-In Carlton.<br />
49510. How long have you been a miller in the colony ?-Since 1854.<br />
49511. How many hands are you employing ?-I think about twenty hands.<br />
49512. Will you point out to the Commission, please, the points wherein you differ from the<br />
previous witnesses ?-It places me almost in an invidious position to do so, because Mr. Gibson and Mr.<br />
Brunton both have been importing this patent machinery, and we have got none <strong>of</strong> them, and I can only<br />
speak from my experience <strong>of</strong> the ordinary machinery. I think that the results that have been shown from<br />
the patent machinery, or almost the same results, could be got from our machinery now in operation. Mr.<br />
Brunton says our machinery is as old as Pharaoh ; I think that is an argument in its favour. If it has stood<br />
that time there must be something good in it.<br />
49513. Do I understand your evidence to go to this point, that you do not want the duty <strong>of</strong>f patent<br />
machinery ?-No.<br />
49514. The question as to which is the whiter flour is not a question for us to consider at all; our<br />
question is what you recommend in relation to the duty. The previous witnesses agree that it would be a<br />
good thing to take <strong>of</strong>f the duty upon patent machinery; do you disagree with them ?-I could not give an<br />
opinion upon that, because we can get on without it; besides which, I think the machinery could be made<br />
in the colony except some parts <strong>of</strong> it; all the rest could be made in the colony.<br />
49515. On whatever point do you differ from them ?-I would rather the Commission would ask<br />
me questions than that I should make statements.<br />
49516. I want to save your time and the time <strong>of</strong> the Commission too. I understood that you wished<br />
to be examined because you differed from the previous witnesses upon some points material to the question.<br />
If you do not differ from them, it is no use going on. However, I will ask you do you agree with the<br />
previous witnesses as to taking <strong>of</strong>f the duty on wheat ?-No, I do not.<br />
49517. Will you state to the Commission your grounds for objecting to the removal <strong>of</strong> it ?-I know<br />
as to the town millers it would be an advantage to them, but it would be much to the detriment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
farmers <strong>of</strong> this country, if the duties are taken <strong>of</strong>f.<br />
49518. If it were to the detriment <strong>of</strong> the farmers would it be to the interest <strong>of</strong> the millers ?-They<br />
are pretty nearly identicaL<br />
49519. Then would it be to the interest <strong>of</strong> the miller to have this duty taken <strong>of</strong>f?-Yes, because<br />
then :Melbourne would be a sort <strong>of</strong> emporium for the whole <strong>of</strong> the colonies-a centre to which all the grain<br />
would come to be treated. It would be good for the ::Ylelbourne merchants and millers., but it would act<br />
prejudicially to the farmers ancl country millers.<br />
'<br />
49520. Have you got any facts to support that opinion ?-The facts are these; that before there was<br />
a duty upon wheat, flour was dearer. :Flour is cheaper in Melbourne now than it was then, ancl it is<br />
cheaper in Melbourne at the present moment than in any other part <strong>of</strong> the colonies, except perhaps New<br />
Zealand.<br />
49521. Have you any opinion to express or any evidence to give in relation to the duty upon barley<br />
and oats-do you deal in those articles ttt all ?-~o, that is more a question for farmers.<br />
T.i.ntl