15.05.2014 Views

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1459<br />

49302. Have you tried Queensland sugar at all in your factory?-Yes, we tried it, but we prefer<br />

the Mauril.ius.<br />

49303. Supposing the Queensland sug:u were admitted duty free ?-That would make a little<br />

difference <strong>of</strong> course.<br />

4930±. ·w onld you be able then to do with less duty upon your jam?-I could not say, I ttm sure; we<br />

do not like to remove the duties.<br />

49305. \Ve are bound, <strong>of</strong> course, to look all round the question. Has not the duty upon imported<br />

jam so thoroughly established the local manufacturer that the imported jam is almost beaten out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rnQrket now ?-Yes, I believe it is.<br />

49306. It is (t rare thing, for instance, to see Wotherspoon's jmn in a grocer's windows, is it not?­<br />

I remember ten or twelve years ago you usecl to see any amount <strong>of</strong> imported jam, now I never see it.<br />

49307. If you could supply your jam even at a lower price than you do now, in consequence say, <strong>of</strong><br />

the removal <strong>of</strong> the duty from Queenshmd sugar, and the using <strong>of</strong> that sugar instead <strong>of</strong> the Mauritius, would<br />

not you still be able to keep out the imported jam, even if the duty were 1d. instead <strong>of</strong> 2d.?-Yes, no t1oubt<br />

we could.<br />

49308. You are not afraid <strong>of</strong> the competition with Tasmanian jam, are you ?-No, the gardeners<br />

here are increasing their gardens so much, that the fruit is beginning to be almost as plentiful in this colony<br />

as Tasmania.<br />

49309. Has not fruit this season, in fact, been far more plentiful ?-Yes, every year it increases.<br />

49310. It has been rotting under the trees in almost every direction, and they have been feeding pigs<br />

with it, to my own knowledge ?-No.<br />

49311. Now, with a cheaper and more plentiful supply <strong>of</strong> frnit and with Queensland sugar duty<br />

free ?-If we could get sugar duty free it would make a great difference, it is .£3 a ton.<br />

49312. You could do with a duty <strong>of</strong> Id. a pound instead <strong>of</strong> 2d.?-The sugar duty is not equal to a<br />

duty <strong>of</strong> 1d. a pound upon jam.<br />

49313. No, <strong>of</strong> course not. Has there been any increase in the price <strong>of</strong> colonial jam since you<br />

started ?-No, quite the other way. It has decreased.<br />

49314. When you commenced ten yem·s ago, for instance, what were yon able to get for your jam?<br />

-About 7s. 6d. a dozen, 7s. and Is. 6d.<br />

49315. A dozen one pound tins ?-Yes.<br />

49316. Then it had to come into competition with Wotherspoon's ?-Yes, and English jams.<br />

49317. Which were sold ~tt what ?-About 8s. 6d.<br />

49318. Now you are able to supply it at what ?-We are able to supply the best jams now at<br />

5s. 3d.<br />

49319. The local competition <strong>of</strong> one jam maker with the other has brought down the price ?-That<br />

is what has done it.<br />

49320. By Mr. Mcintyre.-Do I understand that that is about 5;f;d. a pound that you are charging<br />

for jillll ?-Yes.<br />

49321. And do you really require 2d. a pound duty upon an m'ticle ntlued at only 5.!cl. ?-Yes, but<br />

there are the expenses <strong>of</strong> getting it up, the tins and everything.<br />

49322. But in the face <strong>of</strong> the fact that the fruit is now so plentiful and so cheap compared with<br />

what it was when you started, and sugar also, do you mean to say that you could not do with Id. a pound<br />

upon an article that could be made for 5d. ?-I have no doubt we could hold our own at Id. a pound, I am<br />

not afraid <strong>of</strong> tnat, if Qtleenslancl sugar is admitted L1uty free.<br />

'19323. By the Chainnan.-Have you anything further to say yourself?-No, I do not know <strong>of</strong><br />

1mything.<br />

'l'he witness withdr·ew.<br />

Edward White sworn and examined.<br />

EHa.s Ct:mliff,<br />

contt'nued,<br />

3rd May 1883.<br />

49324. By the Cl!airmcm.-\Vhat are you ?-Sauce and cordial maker. Edward White,<br />

49325. Where is your factory situated ?-Church-street, Richmond. ilrd May 1883.<br />

4932G. How long has it been established ?-Six or seven years as a sauce maker.<br />

49327. How many hands are you employing ?.,-From eight to twelve.<br />

49328. Say ten--what is the principal article you manufacture?-VVe are bottlers as well as sauce<br />

and cordial makers.<br />

49329. What is the principal article you manufacture ?-Beer.<br />

49330. You want to evidence upon the question <strong>of</strong> sauce ?-Sauce only.<br />

49331. Are there any particular kinds <strong>of</strong> sauces that you devote yourselves to, or do you make them<br />

all ?-We make all kinds <strong>of</strong> sauces.<br />

49332. In what way does the tariff affect that industry ?-Since the tariff was altered upon sauces<br />

the market has been :flooded with English sauces, to the great detriment <strong>of</strong> the colonial maker.<br />

49333. When was the tariff altered ?-I do not know the preci~e elate, but it was altered from 1s.<br />

a dozen fm· reputed half-pints, to a 10 per cent. ad valorem.<br />

49 334. "Oilmen's stores (except essential oils and essences not containing alcohol) packed in bottles,<br />

jm·s, canisters, or vessels not exceeding one requted quart in size, 20 per cent." That is the duty. If they<br />

do exceed those quarts and sizes what is it then, Mr. Dryscble ?-(.Jir. Drysdale) 10 per cent., like<br />

chutney in casks.<br />

49335. Then they simply put it into bottles containing a little more than a quart and get it in at 10<br />

per cent. duty, is that it ?-[The PVitness J-Yes, but I am referring more particularly to half-pint bottles.<br />

49336. Then they pay 20 per cent. ?-Then I was under a misimpression. But what we want is a<br />

:fixed duty <strong>of</strong> ls. a dozen upon reputed half-pints, and 2s. a dozen upon repnted pints.<br />

49337. By JJ1r. Mcintgre.-No matte1~ what the value <strong>of</strong> the article ?-Yes, decidedly, because these<br />

sauces that are brought here are pretty much <strong>of</strong> a value; there is only one particular niake thQtis a hi"h<br />

0<br />

price, and that is Lea and Perrin's.<br />

49338. By the Chqirmq,n,-Yo11 represent to the Cprpmission tha.t 20 per c~mt. is not sufficient?~<br />

Yes,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!