Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria
Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria
Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1456<br />
49195. Are you <strong>of</strong> opinion that there should be no variation in the duty, no matter what the starch<br />
3r~~:;;dsea. may be made from ?-I may say that only that one class <strong>of</strong> starch comes in.<br />
49196. But there is the maizena starch coming in, is there not ?-No, it is not brought in now ; it<br />
is made in America.<br />
49196A. There is wheaten starch coming in ?-I doubt it.<br />
49197. By JYir. Gt·imwode.-Wlmt is Colman's starch ?_:_Rice.<br />
49198. There is a starch called wheaten starch, is there not ?-[.No anstver.j<br />
49199. By J.lh. Bosisto.-How do you judge between wl:leat starch and rice starch?-You find it<br />
ou by using it.<br />
49200. using it is the chief thing, is it not ?-Ye~. . ..<br />
49201. Then you do not recommend any alteration <strong>of</strong> duty as between one starch and another?<br />
No, I cannot recommend any alteration in the duty any way, either to raise or lower it. Of course, if yon<br />
raise it higher it would stop import more; but we do not wish to see it higher or lower at present ..<br />
49202. You do not wish for a diiierential duty between one starch ~tnd another'?-No; I do not<br />
see that it would be any advantage in any way ; all I can say is that these duties have given a great<br />
impetus to all the manufactures that we produce and other8 also, and given it a tendency to make this<br />
the chief manufacturing city <strong>of</strong> Australia.<br />
49203. By the lion. ·.iJ.fr. Lorimer.-Whose starch that is imported competes most 'with yours?-<br />
Colman's and Reckitt's, the two principal makers in Euglam~. ..<br />
49204. Can you tell us the average cost <strong>of</strong> these starches in England ?-I could not say exact'ly; I<br />
should think somewhere about £30 per ton. ·<br />
49205. How much per pound is that ?-Threepence. .<br />
49206. Then what percentage is 2d. 'llpon that ad vcol01·ern ?-It would vary, I should think, from<br />
3d. to 3~cl.<br />
49207. What is tlmt ctcl 1:alorem at 2d. a pound-is it not over 60 per cent. ?-It is high.<br />
49208. Do you tell us seriously it is necessary to protect your industry, to have 66 per cent-could<br />
not you do with a lower protective duty than that ?-At present I do not see that it could very well do<br />
with a lower duty.<br />
49209. You havetold us you were doing blacking with a duty <strong>of</strong> 20 per cent.?-Yes.<br />
49210. How is it you can do that ?-Most <strong>of</strong> the material for blacking is prodnced in the colony,<br />
but the raw material for starch has to be brought from India, China, Japan, and many other places,<br />
making the cost much greater.<br />
49211. Cannot you rice as cheap from India and Japan to Australia as you can to London?-<br />
No, I think it would be clearer here, freight is so much clearer to any <strong>of</strong> our ports than it is to England;<br />
and another difference is that in blacking every ounce or pound <strong>of</strong> the mw material we buy is used up, and<br />
in making starch yon only get a small percentage <strong>of</strong> the material.<br />
49212. Then you do not think you could do with a lower protective duty than 60 per cent. upon<br />
starch ?-We should not wish to see it a,ltered at present.<br />
49213. Have you made a calculation to see whethee you conld not do with a lower duty ?-There is<br />
one thing, I see no benefit to accrue to anyone from it. If starch was so much higher when we commenced<br />
manufacturing, >1nd is so much lower now to the public, the public woulll not benefit by the<br />
reduction.<br />
40214. What other article do you produce beside starch and blacking?-\Ve have a long list <strong>of</strong><br />
articles. We have blue, and ·washing powder, and baking powder, and all that description <strong>of</strong> goods.<br />
49215. What duty have you upon them ?-Twenty pet· cent.<br />
49216. Then starch is the only one that hns more than 20 per cent.?-13lue and starch; blue is 2d.<br />
a lb.<br />
49217. Do you manufacture pickles ?-No, we do not manufactme pickles. I may say that we pay<br />
from 100 to 200 per cent. for wages more than they do in England. .<br />
49218. Do you know the cost <strong>of</strong> blue in England ?-It is one <strong>of</strong> those articles that varies very much<br />
from a low price up to a very high price.<br />
49219. Wht1t is the ordinary average <strong>of</strong> the imported ?-I could not say the maker's price at home.<br />
49220. I see the revenue has gone down very much npon it, so yon have succeeded in shutting it<br />
out at2cl., it has gone down in three years from £1,000. In 1876 it was £1,982, and hest year it was only<br />
.£800. Can you tell us the average price <strong>of</strong> the imported article ?-I could not; I do not know the maker's<br />
price at home.<br />
4[)221. What is your price ?-Onr price here is as low as 7~d.<br />
':!9222. Then I suppose the English price might be whe,t-Gd. or 7d. ?-It is quite possible it might<br />
be, but the price <strong>of</strong> English here was from lOcl. to 1s. previonroly.<br />
49223. I suppose the 2d. is 40 to 50 per cent. upon the English price, is it not?--Yes, I suppose<br />
it is.<br />
49224. By Jlfr. Gri?mixtde.-Do you make starch from rice in bond?-Yes, we make it in bond.<br />
49225. Do you get all the facilities you want ?-The Government have granted us all facilities.<br />
49226. Have yon tried making starch from wheat ?-No.<br />
49227. I suppose it requires a different plant ?-I suppose it requires a different plant.<br />
49228. Is the yield from wheat as good ?-I suppose it is about the same, perhaps.<br />
49220. B.1J the Chainnan.-You say that the price <strong>of</strong> starch at home is £20 per ton ?-About £30<br />
I think, somewhere about £30, somewhere about 3~d., as nom as I can ji.1dge.<br />
49230. The price <strong>of</strong> it in England?-Yes.<br />
4[)231. How much dces it cost to bnd here ?-I have not gone into that.<br />
49232. Without the duty ?-I think the charges come to one-third generally upon those things for<br />
importing, one• third <strong>of</strong> the cost ..<br />
49233. That would he a Id. a pouucl ?-I suppose it would, freight and charges, and all that.<br />
40234. The price listed here was 4~cl. ?-I should think about 4d., or between 4d. and 1td·<br />
49235. Has there been any rise in the price <strong>of</strong> starch at home lately ?-No. It has come clown. I<br />
am not