15.05.2014 Views

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

Minutes of Evidence p.1401-1509 - Parliament of Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1456<br />

49195. Are you <strong>of</strong> opinion that there should be no variation in the duty, no matter what the starch<br />

3r~~:;;dsea. may be made from ?-I may say that only that one class <strong>of</strong> starch comes in.<br />

49196. But there is the maizena starch coming in, is there not ?-No, it is not brought in now ; it<br />

is made in America.<br />

49196A. There is wheaten starch coming in ?-I doubt it.<br />

49197. By JYir. Gt·imwode.-Wlmt is Colman's starch ?_:_Rice.<br />

49198. There is a starch called wheaten starch, is there not ?-[.No anstver.j<br />

49199. By J.lh. Bosisto.-How do you judge between wl:leat starch and rice starch?-You find it<br />

ou by using it.<br />

49200. using it is the chief thing, is it not ?-Ye~. . ..<br />

49201. Then you do not recommend any alteration <strong>of</strong> duty as between one starch and another?­<br />

No, I cannot recommend any alteration in the duty any way, either to raise or lower it. Of course, if yon<br />

raise it higher it would stop import more; but we do not wish to see it higher or lower at present ..<br />

49202. You do not wish for a diiierential duty between one starch ~tnd another'?-No; I do not<br />

see that it would be any advantage in any way ; all I can say is that these duties have given a great<br />

impetus to all the manufactures that we produce and other8 also, and given it a tendency to make this<br />

the chief manufacturing city <strong>of</strong> Australia.<br />

49203. By the lion. ·.iJ.fr. Lorimer.-Whose starch that is imported competes most 'with yours?-<br />

Colman's and Reckitt's, the two principal makers in Euglam~. ..<br />

49204. Can you tell us the average cost <strong>of</strong> these starches in England ?-I could not say exact'ly; I<br />

should think somewhere about £30 per ton. ·<br />

49205. How much per pound is that ?-Threepence. .<br />

49206. Then what percentage is 2d. 'llpon that ad vcol01·ern ?-It would vary, I should think, from<br />

3d. to 3~cl.<br />

49207. What is tlmt ctcl 1:alorem at 2d. a pound-is it not over 60 per cent. ?-It is high.<br />

49208. Do you tell us seriously it is necessary to protect your industry, to have 66 per cent-could<br />

not you do with a lower protective duty than that ?-At present I do not see that it could very well do<br />

with a lower duty.<br />

49209. You havetold us you were doing blacking with a duty <strong>of</strong> 20 per cent.?-Yes.<br />

49210. How is it you can do that ?-Most <strong>of</strong> the material for blacking is prodnced in the colony,<br />

but the raw material for starch has to be brought from India, China, Japan, and many other places,<br />

making the cost much greater.<br />

49211. Cannot you rice as cheap from India and Japan to Australia as you can to London?-<br />

No, I think it would be clearer here, freight is so much clearer to any <strong>of</strong> our ports than it is to England;<br />

and another difference is that in blacking every ounce or pound <strong>of</strong> the mw material we buy is used up, and<br />

in making starch yon only get a small percentage <strong>of</strong> the material.<br />

49212. Then you do not think you could do with a lower protective duty than 60 per cent. upon<br />

starch ?-We should not wish to see it a,ltered at present.<br />

49213. Have you made a calculation to see whethee you conld not do with a lower duty ?-There is<br />

one thing, I see no benefit to accrue to anyone from it. If starch was so much higher when we commenced<br />

manufacturing, >1nd is so much lower now to the public, the public woulll not benefit by the<br />

reduction.<br />

40214. What other article do you produce beside starch and blacking?-\Ve have a long list <strong>of</strong><br />

articles. We have blue, and ·washing powder, and baking powder, and all that description <strong>of</strong> goods.<br />

49215. What duty have you upon them ?-Twenty pet· cent.<br />

49216. Then starch is the only one that hns more than 20 per cent.?-13lue and starch; blue is 2d.<br />

a lb.<br />

49217. Do you manufacture pickles ?-No, we do not manufactme pickles. I may say that we pay<br />

from 100 to 200 per cent. for wages more than they do in England. .<br />

49218. Do you know the cost <strong>of</strong> blue in England ?-It is one <strong>of</strong> those articles that varies very much<br />

from a low price up to a very high price.<br />

49219. Wht1t is the ordinary average <strong>of</strong> the imported ?-I could not say the maker's price at home.<br />

49220. I see the revenue has gone down very much npon it, so yon have succeeded in shutting it<br />

out at2cl., it has gone down in three years from £1,000. In 1876 it was £1,982, and hest year it was only<br />

.£800. Can you tell us the average price <strong>of</strong> the imported article ?-I could not; I do not know the maker's<br />

price at home.<br />

4[)221. What is your price ?-Onr price here is as low as 7~d.<br />

':!9222. Then I suppose the English price might be whe,t-Gd. or 7d. ?-It is quite possible it might<br />

be, but the price <strong>of</strong> English here was from lOcl. to 1s. previonroly.<br />

49223. I suppose the 2d. is 40 to 50 per cent. upon the English price, is it not?--Yes, I suppose<br />

it is.<br />

49224. By Jlfr. Gri?mixtde.-Do you make starch from rice in bond?-Yes, we make it in bond.<br />

49225. Do you get all the facilities you want ?-The Government have granted us all facilities.<br />

49226. Have yon tried making starch from wheat ?-No.<br />

49227. I suppose it requires a different plant ?-I suppose it requires a different plant.<br />

49228. Is the yield from wheat as good ?-I suppose it is about the same, perhaps.<br />

49220. B.1J the Chainnan.-You say that the price <strong>of</strong> starch at home is £20 per ton ?-About £30<br />

I think, somewhere about £30, somewhere about 3~d., as nom as I can ji.1dge.<br />

49230. The price <strong>of</strong> it in England?-Yes.<br />

4[)231. How much dces it cost to bnd here ?-I have not gone into that.<br />

49232. Without the duty ?-I think the charges come to one-third generally upon those things for<br />

importing, one• third <strong>of</strong> the cost ..<br />

49233. That would he a Id. a pouucl ?-I suppose it would, freight and charges, and all that.<br />

40234. The price listed here was 4~cl. ?-I should think about 4d., or between 4d. and 1td·<br />

49235. Has there been any rise in the price <strong>of</strong> starch at home lately ?-No. It has come clown. I<br />

am not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!