20.05.2014 Views

link to my thesis

link to my thesis

link to my thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11.3. KRONECKER CANONICAL FORM OF A TWO-PARAMETER PENCIL 199<br />

where the matrices B, C, and D have at most ((N − 1) 2 + 1)2 N unique rows and<br />

exactly (N −1) 2 2 N columns. Let us denote the dimensions of these matrices by m×n.<br />

The equivalence of (11.7) and (11.3) implies that (11.7) has a finite number of<br />

solutions <strong>to</strong>o.<br />

Let us now consider the rectangular eigenvalue problem (11.7) as a one-parameter<br />

eigenvalue problem in ρ 1 with matrices containing entries from the field C(ρ 2 ). Then<br />

(11.7) can be rewritten as the equivalent homogeneous system of equations:<br />

(<br />

P (ρ2 )+ρ 1 Q(ρ 2 ) ) w = 0 (11.8)<br />

where P (ρ 2 )=B + ρ 2 D and Q(ρ 2 )=C, both of dimensions m × n.<br />

Because the one-parameter pencil P + ρ 1 Q in problem (11.8) is rectangular it<br />

is singular by definition. We now could proceed as in Section 10.3: by computing<br />

the Kronecker Canonical form of this one-parameter matrix pencil and by splitting<br />

off its singular parts, one can try <strong>to</strong> determine the regular part of the pencil. Then<br />

one expects <strong>to</strong> compute solutions ρ 1 and ρ 2 of the original problem (11.3) from this<br />

regular part.<br />

The next subsections describe the transformation in<strong>to</strong> the Kronecker canonical<br />

form, the structure of the involved transformed matrices and three methods <strong>to</strong> determine<br />

these transformation matrices <strong>to</strong> split off singular parts using exact arithmetic.<br />

We use here in fact a generalization of the techniques of the Kronecker canonical form<br />

computations for singular one-parameter pencils in C presented in Section 10.3 of the<br />

previous chapter.<br />

11.3.1 Transformation in<strong>to</strong> the Kronecker canonical form<br />

When varying the value of ρ 1 in Equation (11.8) it may happen that solutions exist<br />

for all values of ρ 1 , but other solutions may exist only for special values of ρ 1 . To<br />

emphasize the dependence of the solution set on the value of ρ 1 , we shall write w(ρ 1 ).<br />

The matrix pencil P + ρ 1 Q can be brought in<strong>to</strong> Kronecker canonical form. This<br />

involves a transformation in<strong>to</strong> the form:<br />

W −1 (P + ρ 1 Q)V = D + ρ 1 E (11.9)<br />

where V (of size n × n) and W (of size m × m) are invertible transformation matrices<br />

with entries in C(ρ 2 ). The solutions ˜w(ρ 1 ) <strong>to</strong> the set of equations:<br />

(D + ρ 1 E)˜w = 0 (11.10)<br />

are related <strong>to</strong> those of the original problem (P + ρ 1 Q)w = 0 according <strong>to</strong>:<br />

w(ρ 1 )=V ˜w(ρ 1 ). (11.11)<br />

Note that the systems of equations are equivalent when working over C(ρ 2 ), i.e.,<br />

every solution ˜w(ρ 1 ) corresponds <strong>to</strong> a unique solution w(ρ 1 ) and vice versa, since V<br />

is invertible.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!