20.05.2014 Views

link to my thesis

link to my thesis

link to my thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 12<br />

Conclusions & directions for further<br />

research<br />

12.1 Conclusions<br />

In Chapter 4 of this <strong>thesis</strong> a global optimization method is worked out <strong>to</strong> compute the<br />

global optimum of a Minkowski dominated polynomial. This method is based on the<br />

Stetter-Möller matrix method which transforms the problem of finding the solutions<br />

of the system of first-order conditions in<strong>to</strong> an eigenvalue problem involving a large<br />

and sparse matrix. This method is described in [81] and a similar approach in [50]<br />

and [48]. A drawback of this approach is that the involved matrices are usually very<br />

large. The efficiency of this method is improved in this <strong>thesis</strong> by using a matrix-free<br />

implementation of the matrix-vec<strong>to</strong>r products and by using an iterative eigenvalue<br />

solver instead of a direct solver.<br />

In Chapter 5 we have developed a routine that computes the action of the large<br />

and sparse matrix, provided by the Stetter-Möller matrix method, on a given vec<strong>to</strong>r<br />

without having this matrix explicitly at hand. To avoid building the large matrix<br />

the system of first-order conditions are associated with an nD-system of difference<br />

equations. Such an nD-system yields a matrix-free routine and such a routine is all<br />

that is needed for modern iterative eigenproblem solvers as input. It will turn out<br />

that this works perfectly <strong>to</strong>gether which proves the computational feasibility of this<br />

approach.<br />

Section 5.3 focuses on improving the efficiency of computing the action of such a<br />

matrix on a vec<strong>to</strong>r. One way <strong>to</strong> compute the action of the matrix by an nD-system<br />

efficiently, is by setting up a corresponding shortest path problem (SPP) and solve it<br />

as described in Section 5.3.2. A drawback here is that this SPP will quickly become<br />

huge and difficult <strong>to</strong> solve. However, it it is possible <strong>to</strong> set up a relaxation of the<br />

shortest path problem (RSPP) which is considerably smaller and easier <strong>to</strong> solve. In<br />

the 2D-case the RSPP is solved analytically and its solution happens <strong>to</strong> solve the<br />

229

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!