Control and Design of Microgrid Components - Power Systems ...
Control and Design of Microgrid Components - Power Systems ...
Control and Design of Microgrid Components - Power Systems ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
linearity. A value <strong>of</strong> 30 degrees provides a 4% error in the linear approximation, but a maximum<br />
power angle value <strong>of</strong> 10 degrees implies that the largest error in the approximation would be<br />
0.5%. A smaller range for the power angle would require too much precision in the<br />
synthesization <strong>of</strong> the angle at the inverter terminals. The inverter synthesizes the voltage angle<br />
with a certain tolerance depending on the switching frequency. The higher is the operating<br />
frequency the lower is this tolerance. If a large range for the power range is chosen, then the<br />
relative size <strong>of</strong> the error is small <strong>and</strong> there are no problems in injecting power. If a small range is<br />
chosen, then the same absolute value <strong>of</strong> the tolerance becomes relatively large compared to the<br />
range <strong>of</strong> delta, implying problems in achieving constant power injection. The power would<br />
oscillate, <strong>and</strong> if the range for the angle is chosen really small, say a fraction <strong>of</strong> a degree, then it<br />
would be nearly impossible to regulate power due to the fact that the angle would need to be held<br />
with a very high precision.<br />
4.3.1 P versus Q Area <strong>of</strong> Operation<br />
When designing the inverter, the choice <strong>of</strong> ratings <strong>of</strong> the devices plays a key role. The power<br />
electronic block at the minimum has to be rated as the prime mover. If the ratings <strong>of</strong> the prime<br />
mover exceed the inverter ratings then when the prime mover operates at peak power it would be<br />
impossible to transfer its full power. Each inverter has limits dictated by the ratings on the silicon<br />
devices. These limits appear in the form <strong>of</strong> maximum voltage that the power electronic device<br />
can safely sustain <strong>and</strong> the maximum current that it can carry. Based on these considerations, each<br />
designer provides a range <strong>of</strong> active <strong>and</strong> reactive powers that the inverter can safely operate at. At<br />
this point there is the first formulation <strong>of</strong> the answer for the problem <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the inductor:<br />
The size <strong>of</strong> the inductor must be such that it enables delivery <strong>of</strong> the active <strong>and</strong> reactive power<br />
that the inverter can provide.<br />
Figure 4.7 shows the plot <strong>of</strong> the active <strong>and</strong> reactive power obtained from the formulas included<br />
in Figure 4.5 as a function <strong>of</strong> the inverter <strong>and</strong> bus voltage, their angle difference <strong>and</strong> the<br />
impedance. All quantities are in per unit to maintain generality <strong>and</strong> the plot is obtained for the<br />
power angle equal to 15 degrees. Smaller inductances allow larger power flows. The inductor<br />
should be chosen small enough to guaranteed deliver <strong>of</strong> the specified amounts <strong>of</strong> power: if the<br />
inductor is chosen too large the power may no longer be deliverable. The optimal inductor size<br />
can be seen as the maximum size that the inductor can have, <strong>and</strong> still being able to satisfy the<br />
delivery requirements.<br />
To develop some intuition on how to solve the problem it is useful to build some maps <strong>of</strong> the<br />
power that it is possible to deliver given the limits that need to be satisfied.<br />
55