here - United Kingdom Parliament
here - United Kingdom Parliament
here - United Kingdom Parliament
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
335WH<br />
[Julian Sturdy]<br />
Health Care (North Yorkshire and<br />
York)<br />
also received representations from concerned health<br />
professionals. Only last week, Dr Peter Toomey, a consultant<br />
anaesthetist at York hospital wrote to me, stating:<br />
“I consider that the PCT have made serious errors of judgement<br />
in coming to their decision to restrict access to spinal injections<br />
for the relief of pain. The PCT will not reimburse York Hospital<br />
for any injection into any part of the spine for any diagnosis<br />
unless it has been approved by the PCT’s Funding Request<br />
Panel.”<br />
We know—my hon. Friend the Member for Selby and<br />
Ainsty will back me up on this—that many people are<br />
being refused by that request panel. Dr Toomey and a<br />
number of his colleagues have fought hard to challenge<br />
the PCT’s policy, but—alas—their medical expertise<br />
seems to have fallen upon deaf ears.<br />
Patients and medical professionals are united in the<br />
view that this pain relief service should not have been<br />
withdrawn. It has been taken away for the wrong reasons<br />
and should be reinstated without delay. The withdrawal<br />
of such vital services is causing me great concern, as is<br />
the withdrawal of funding for numerous voluntary services.<br />
My hon. Friend the Member for Skipton and Ripon<br />
touched on that matter earlier. The York Council for<br />
Voluntary Service has been informed of a 37% in-year<br />
cut, which has been issued by the PCT with just one<br />
month’s notice. Angela Harrison, the chief executive of<br />
the YCVS, summed up the whole situation quite aptly<br />
when she said:<br />
“These cuts have already had a disastrous effect on front-line<br />
voluntary groups who serve some of the most vulnerable members<br />
of society. At the same time, the infrastructure groups who<br />
support them have had their funds withdrawn at very short<br />
notice, reducing their capacity at a time when it is most needed.”<br />
One specific voluntary case vividly highlights the<br />
poor management of the way the PCT has handled this<br />
situation. On 19 October, Yorkshire MESMAC received<br />
a letter from the PCT, informing the organisation that<br />
its contracted health care funding was to be withdrawn<br />
within one month. Such blunt and definitive notice is<br />
absolutely outrageous. Not only has an agreement been<br />
broken, but no consultation took place with the<br />
organisation, which—knowing the PCT’s overspend—<br />
would have been happy to sit down and reach a more<br />
amicable agreement. As Tom Doyle, the director of<br />
Yorkshire MESMAC, said:<br />
“I want to express my deep frustration at how the process has<br />
been handled, which was, in my opinion, unlawful, disrespectful<br />
and showing an arrogant disregard for the PCT’s own agreements<br />
and processes.”<br />
It is now feared that Yorkshire MESMAC will be forced<br />
to close.<br />
On a wider note, the voluntary services budgets are<br />
expected to lead to a saving of some £150,000 for the<br />
PCT this year. Given that that is a small drop in the<br />
£17 million overspend, I would urge the PCT to look<br />
internally for structural and efficiency savings, rather<br />
than merely reducing the funding of voluntary groups,<br />
whose work often plays such as vital role in our health<br />
service. If our voluntary health services are forced to<br />
close, I predict that far greater numbers of patients will<br />
actually require more hospitalised, long-term and expensive<br />
treatments through the NHS, thus undermining the<br />
PCT’s initial savings.<br />
Due to the overspend and service reductions, t<strong>here</strong><br />
now exists a lack of trust in the PCT and a complete<br />
absence of confidence over its future intentions, and I<br />
1 DECEMBER 2010<br />
Health Care (North Yorkshire and<br />
York)<br />
336WH<br />
fear that local people are simply paying too high a price<br />
for that. In the long term, I am more optimistic about<br />
health care provision in north Yorkshire and York,<br />
largely due to the contents of the health White Paper.<br />
The localised drive to ensure that PCTs are, at some<br />
point, abolished altogether and replaced by GP-led<br />
commissioning bodies, which are influenced by local<br />
patients, is a measure that I wholeheartedly welcome.<br />
At long last, local patients will have a say in their<br />
local services, holding the decision makers to account<br />
and freeing up our nurses, doctors and health providers<br />
from the red-tape that so often binds them and takes<br />
them away from the front line. I hope that the Minister<br />
can reassure me that the transition from PCTs to GP-led<br />
commissioning will be carried out swiftly to ensure that<br />
the interim transitional period will not see a lack of<br />
leadership or direction for local health care services—<br />
especially in our area.<br />
I believe that the PCT will continue to operate until<br />
2013, and I plead with the Minister to review to the<br />
situation in north Yorkshire and York in the mean time.<br />
Our constituents simply cannot afford to wait three<br />
years for the situation to be remedied. Most specifically,<br />
I would welcome any comments from the Minister on<br />
the previous Government’s imposition of a statutory<br />
obligation on PCTs to break even by the end of this<br />
year. Could that deadline be extended to soften the<br />
blow of the cuts over a greater time period?<br />
The people of north Yorkshire and York depend<br />
upon their health care services, and many are extremely<br />
worried at present. I hope that hon. Members from the<br />
region—I was going to say “regardless of political<br />
allegiances”, but as we only have coalition Members<br />
<strong>here</strong> I will not say that. To give the hon. Member for<br />
York Central (Hugh Bayley) credit, he did say that he<br />
would try and be at the debate today.<br />
We must protect the essential health care services and<br />
funding that our region deserves. I ask and urge hon.<br />
Members to fight and to campaign for that. We must<br />
ensure that, before GP-led commissioning starts, the<br />
PCT delivers the best service that it can within its<br />
budget. It must focus on service delivery and the outlying<br />
services to our communities, rather than cutting.<br />
I hope that the Minister will give serious consideration<br />
to the issues that I have raised. I am grateful for his time.<br />
I know that it has been a hectic day thanks to the<br />
Divisions, but I am grateful to him for giving us the<br />
time, and I hope that he will give the matter serious<br />
consideration.<br />
5.15 pm<br />
Andrew Jones (Harrogate and Knaresborough) (Con):<br />
I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for York<br />
Outer (Julian Sturdy) on securing this important debate,<br />
and I add my support to his recognition of the excellent<br />
work that the health care professionals do in our area.<br />
He has highlighted that our health grant in North<br />
Yorkshire is low, which impacts on the services that we<br />
receive.<br />
When facing the challenge of low funding, the PCT<br />
has to look hard at its priorities, particularly with<br />
regard to mental health services. I am always concerned<br />
about mental health provision, because I think that<br />
for far too long in our country it has been a bit of a<br />
Cinderella service. In my constituency, the community