04.06.2014 Views

here - United Kingdom Parliament

here - United Kingdom Parliament

here - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

891 National Policy Statements 1 DECEMBER 2010 National Policy Statements 892<br />

Andrew Percy (Brigg and Goole) (Con): In my<br />

constituency, many properties are not on the gas network,<br />

and t<strong>here</strong> are no plans to expand the network into many<br />

of the small villages t<strong>here</strong>. Will those properties be able<br />

to access alternative sources of heating through the<br />

green deal, perhaps through air source heat pumps and<br />

so on?<br />

Charles Hendry: I am grateful to my hon. Friend for<br />

the work that he has done to highlight issues such as<br />

these. We said in the coalition agreement that prioritising<br />

off-grid customers would be an important part of what<br />

we are seeking to do. However, the help for them will<br />

not come through the measures in the green deal. His<br />

constituents will of course be eligible for support for<br />

energy efficiency measures through the green deal, but<br />

the renewable heat incentive will give them support for<br />

other mechanisms such as air source heat pumps, ground<br />

source heat pumps and solar thermal installations. T<strong>here</strong><br />

will be a different funding mechanism for that, and we<br />

have confirmed that £860 million will be made available<br />

for the renewable heat incentive. We will set out the<br />

precise details of that in the next few weeks, and it will<br />

target precisely the people that he is most concerned<br />

about in that respect.<br />

Albert Owen (Ynys Môn) (Lab): The Minister has<br />

been very effective in campaigning for the extension of<br />

the gas network throughout the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong>, but<br />

what he has just said will be of little comfort to people<br />

in many areas who simply want a choice. At present,<br />

they have oil or liquefied petroleum gas, but they want<br />

mains gas, which is often located only a few hundred<br />

yards away from their village or hamlet. Do the Government<br />

understand their frustration? Given that the market is<br />

failing them, would it be possible for incentives to be<br />

given in this regard, and for the regulator to ensure that<br />

those gas connections can take place?<br />

Charles Hendry: The hon. Gentleman raises an important<br />

point. Certainly, encouraging people to install renewable<br />

heat sources, particularly in off-grid properties, is part<br />

of the solution. He is absolutely right to say, however,<br />

that for many people, the convenience of being on the<br />

grid will be their primary concern. It must be extremely<br />

frustrating to live in a house close to the grid that is<br />

unable to benefit from it. Ofgem is working to ensure<br />

that the grid is extended, but that is obviously a gradual<br />

process. We are considering different ways of dealing<br />

with the problem. Grid development is mentioned in<br />

the planning policy papers, but we are introducing<br />

other measures such as the renewable heat incentive, to<br />

help people who currently have no alternative to heating<br />

oil or liquefied petroleum gas. I hope that it can be said<br />

that we are dealing with the issue comprehensively.<br />

Sarah Newton (Truro and Falmouth) (Con): Do not<br />

local councils also have an important role to play?<br />

Cornwall council, for example, is undertaking a project<br />

involving feed-in tariffs. It will work with the third<br />

sector in using the money that it earns from installing<br />

solar panels in the county to help those in the greatest<br />

fuel poverty—who, as other Members have pointed out,<br />

are often off grid—not only through energy-efficiency<br />

schemes but by providing heat from more appropriate<br />

sources, such as ground-source heat.<br />

Charles Hendry: My hon. Friend is right to draw that<br />

to the House’s attention. As a result of one of the<br />

changes that we have made, local authorities are now<br />

allowed to sell electricity directly to the grid. Rather<br />

than merely being able to host new facilities, they can<br />

now become involved in these processes as partners.<br />

They can sell the electricity that is generated, and benefit<br />

from the feed-in tariffs or other financial packages that<br />

are available. I hope that, in difficult times, councils<br />

throughout the country will see such measures as an<br />

important potential income-earner and a way of<br />

encouraging their communities to move in a low-carbon<br />

direction. That is a critical part of Government policy.<br />

We have said that t<strong>here</strong> will be special help for the<br />

most vulnerable. The new energy company obligation<br />

will provide additional funds for those who are most in<br />

need and for homes that are hard to treat, which may<br />

need additional support. Our policy also involves the<br />

electricity market reform programme, which is a wholesale<br />

redesign of our electricity market. T<strong>here</strong> is no doubt<br />

that that process, which will begin in a few weeks, is the<br />

most fundamental reform of the market for 30 years. It<br />

involves a new way of encouraging people to invest in<br />

electricity generation, and I cannot over-emphasise the<br />

importance that we attach to it. The power sector needs<br />

to lead the way when it comes to cutting carbon.<br />

Charlie Elphicke (Dover) (Con): Many of my least<br />

well-off and most vulnerable constituents fear that in<br />

five years’ time the lights may go out. What action can<br />

the Government take to deal with the backlog of<br />

infrastructure repairs?<br />

Charles Hendry: I am keen to reassure my hon.<br />

Friend. A couple of years ago, the outlook was a cause<br />

for great concern. The recession reduced demand by 5%<br />

or 6%, and, although it has grown again, it has not<br />

reached its previous level. What appeared to be a serious<br />

pinch point now seems to have been pushed further out,<br />

but that does not give grounds for complacency. We all<br />

know that cold winters and, in particular, cold still days<br />

place immense demand on the system, and we need to<br />

take action to deal with that.<br />

As much as £200 billion of new investment may be<br />

required in our electricity infrastructure. We have to<br />

rebuild it. It would have been much better for the<br />

country if more of that work had been done before<br />

6 May, and it would have been much better had t<strong>here</strong><br />

not been a five-year moratorium on new nuclear and a<br />

delay of some years in new installations. I applaud the<br />

conversion of the last Administration, which began to<br />

put us back on track, but a number of years were lost.<br />

John Woodcock (Barrow and Furness) (Lab/Co-op)<br />

rose—<br />

Huw Irranca-Davies (Ogmore) (Lab) rose—<br />

Charles Hendry: I will give way shortly, but I hope I<br />

shall be forgiven if I do not do so immediately, as I am<br />

in full flight.<br />

We need to establish a structure that will give people<br />

an incentive to invest in new nuclear, clean coal, coal<br />

with carbon capture, renewables—in regard to which<br />

we have great potential—and new gas plant, along with<br />

gas storage. We are alive to all the challenges, and we<br />

are moving forward on all fronts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!