06.06.2014 Views

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The preferred system in the retail industry is dual temperature CO 2<br />

DX Booster systems.<br />

Because CO 2<br />

is highly suitable for heat recovery to tap water and to building heating<br />

such integrated solutions are commonly applied to improve the overall energy<br />

efficiency of the building even further.<br />

The Advansor solution contains only one refrigerant, CO 2<br />

, and offers obvious<br />

environmental benefits as well as energy savings.<br />

Results<br />

Energy Efficiency<br />

Results of cycle simulation using DRY hourly data show that a simple CO 2<br />

booster<br />

system offers superior performance to cascade systems in colder regions of Europe and<br />

comparable energy consumption even in Southern Europe. The results comply very<br />

well with field measurements. Furthermore, the results are interesting because the CO 2<br />

process below can be improved by various means, additionally 5-10% in the warmer<br />

climates.<br />

City<br />

Energy Index to CO2 DX Booster<br />

HFC with<br />

secondary’s<br />

Cascade<br />

(HFC134a / CO 2<br />

)<br />

Stockholm (Sweden) 134 120<br />

Oslo (Norway) 134 120<br />

Paris (France) 127 113<br />

Lyon (France) 123 109<br />

Marseille (France) 117 103<br />

Barcelona (Spain) 116 103<br />

SUMMARY<br />

Summary overview of incentives for retailers refrigerant transition to CO 2<br />

in different<br />

countries:<br />

• Denmark: HFC taxation, HFC ban, Energy savings<br />

• Norway : HFC taxation, Energy savings<br />

• Sweden and Finland: Energy savings<br />

• Switzerland: Rules and Energy savings<br />

• UK: Carbon footprint reduction schemes<br />

All through Europe, CO 2<br />

has been implemented safely and reliably as well as proving its<br />

benefit for the environment and energy reductions.<br />

61<br />

Heat recovery as mentioned above is more beneficial with CO 2<br />

than for any other<br />

refrigerant because the hot gas temperature is warmer and the energy density is higher.<br />

Furthermore, the heat extraction can be controlled much better to match the building<br />

online capacity demand. Recent Swiss field investigations comparing R134a and CO 2<br />

report up to 40% increase of heat recovered at normalized refrigeration power input.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!