Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures
Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures
Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
- 100 -<br />
dealt with until now. In principle., such considerations could be<br />
performed using spring elements that could be formulated similarly<br />
to usual reinforcement elements. However, as concrete and<br />
tendon deform independently except at the anchor regions such a<br />
formulation would couple nodal point* that in general are far<br />
from each other. As a result a very large bandwidth <strong>of</strong> the equation<br />
system would exist making such a formulation prohibitive.<br />
Instead, after specification <strong>of</strong> the initial prestressing forces,<br />
attention is focussed directly to the additional tendon forces<br />
caused by deformations. In the program the dependence between<br />
these forces and the relative deformations <strong>of</strong> the ends <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tendons is specified as the quatrolinear dependence shown in<br />
fig. 3-1 b) where as before consideration has to be taken to the<br />
initial prestressing force. The corresponding nodal forces then<br />
depend on the unknown displacements and this infers that an iterative<br />
process is necessary even when material behaviour is linear.<br />
As we are dealing here mainly with short-term loadings this<br />
is considered to be only a minor disadvantage as changes in tendon<br />
forces caused by deformations are usually <strong>of</strong> interest only<br />
for loadings where material nonlinearities are involved and<br />
where iterations therefore necessarily must be performed. It is<br />
to be noted that unloading is treated correctly.<br />
4.5. Plane stress and strain versus axisymmetric formulation<br />
Until now only the axisymmetric finite elements have been dealt<br />
with. However, the formulation both <strong>of</strong> plane stress and plane<br />
strain elements follows very much the same lines and they will<br />
therefore be treated only schematically in this section. Naturally<br />
the objective for the derivation <strong>of</strong> plane elements is to<br />
achieve formulations that are, as far as possible, analogous to<br />
the axisymmetric case so that, except for certain modifications,<br />
identical subroutines can be utilized in the computer program.<br />
Let us first consider the plane strain concrete element and let<br />
the tangential stress and strain correspond to quantities in the<br />
longitudinal direction <strong>of</strong> the structure, i.e., according to the<br />
plane strain assumption we have e 0 = 0. Now, the displacements