Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures
Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures
Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
- 103 -<br />
now be directed towards nanerical aspects related to the implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> these matters.<br />
The AXIPLANE-program is written in Algol and runs at Rise's<br />
Burrough B-6700 computer using single precision that considers<br />
11 significant digits. Now, essentially the finite element modelling<br />
described in the previous sections results in an equation<br />
system with 2n degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom where n is the number <strong>of</strong> nodal<br />
points, i.e.<br />
R a = f (4.6-1)<br />
Here K denotes the total symmetric stiffness matrix, the vector<br />
a contains all the nodal displacements, while the vector F contains<br />
the nodal forces. This equation refers to the RZ-coordinate<br />
system. However, in accordance with the discussion in section<br />
4.1 the geometric boundary conditions still remain to be<br />
considered.<br />
Suppose that the nodal displacement a. in either the R- or Z-<br />
direction is prescribed as a. = y. In accordance with the method<br />
described by Zienkiewicz and Cheung (1S67) p. 233 the corresponding<br />
j-th equation in the equation system (1) is then modified by<br />
multiplying the diagonal stiffness term K.. with the factor 10<br />
and by replacing the right hand side with the quantity then<br />
obtained multiplied by y. This means that equation j in the<br />
equation system (1) is replaced by<br />
K jl a 1+ K. 2 a 2+ ... + K jj .lO 10 a j+ ... + K. /2n . 1 a 2n _ 1<br />
+K j,2n a 2n- K jj' lol °*<br />
(4 ' 6 " 2)<br />
where no summation convention is utilized. As all other terms<br />
than that containing a. contribute insignificantly, this equation<br />
yields as a very close approximation the attempted expression<br />
a. = y. The advantages <strong>of</strong> the method are that symmetry <strong>of</strong><br />
the coefficient matrix continues and no rearrangements <strong>of</strong> the<br />
equations are involved.