13.06.2014 Views

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 103 -<br />

now be directed towards nanerical aspects related to the implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> these matters.<br />

The AXIPLANE-program is written in Algol and runs at Rise's<br />

Burrough B-6700 computer using single precision that considers<br />

11 significant digits. Now, essentially the finite element modelling<br />

described in the previous sections results in an equation<br />

system with 2n degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom where n is the number <strong>of</strong> nodal<br />

points, i.e.<br />

R a = f (4.6-1)<br />

Here K denotes the total symmetric stiffness matrix, the vector<br />

a contains all the nodal displacements, while the vector F contains<br />

the nodal forces. This equation refers to the RZ-coordinate<br />

system. However, in accordance with the discussion in section<br />

4.1 the geometric boundary conditions still remain to be<br />

considered.<br />

Suppose that the nodal displacement a. in either the R- or Z-<br />

direction is prescribed as a. = y. In accordance with the method<br />

described by Zienkiewicz and Cheung (1S67) p. 233 the corresponding<br />

j-th equation in the equation system (1) is then modified by<br />

multiplying the diagonal stiffness term K.. with the factor 10<br />

and by replacing the right hand side with the quantity then<br />

obtained multiplied by y. This means that equation j in the<br />

equation system (1) is replaced by<br />

K jl a 1+ K. 2 a 2+ ... + K jj .lO 10 a j+ ... + K. /2n . 1 a 2n _ 1<br />

+K j,2n a 2n- K jj' lol °*<br />

(4 ' 6 " 2)<br />

where no summation convention is utilized. As all other terms<br />

than that containing a. contribute insignificantly, this equation<br />

yields as a very close approximation the attempted expression<br />

a. = y. The advantages <strong>of</strong> the method are that symmetry <strong>of</strong><br />

the coefficient matrix continues and no rearrangements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

equations are involved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!