13.06.2014 Views

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 32 -<br />

to that <strong>of</strong> nonlinear elasticity and the model indeed corresponds<br />

to the bei aviour <strong>of</strong> a fracturing solid, Dougill (1976). Moreover,<br />

the described model is able to represent in a simple way most<br />

<strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> concrete behaviour, even for general<br />

stress states. These features include: (1) the effect <strong>of</strong> all three<br />

stress invariants; (2) consideration <strong>of</strong> dilatation; (3) the obtaining<br />

<strong>of</strong> completely smooth stress-strain curves; (4) prediction<br />

<strong>of</strong> realistic failure stresses; (5) simulation <strong>of</strong> different<br />

post-fajlure behaviours and (6) the model applies to all stress<br />

states including those where tensile stresses occur. In addition,<br />

the model is simple to use, and calibration to a particular type<br />

<strong>of</strong> concrete requires only experimental data obtained by standard<br />

uniaxial tests. The construction <strong>of</strong> the model can conveniently<br />

be divided into four steps: (1) failure and cracking criteria;<br />

(2) nonlinearity index; (3) change <strong>of</strong> the secant value <strong>of</strong> Young's<br />

modulus and (4) change <strong>of</strong> the secant value <strong>of</strong> Poisson's ratio.<br />

The failure and cracking criteria utilized in this section are<br />

the ones proposed by the writer and dealt with in sections 2.1.3<br />

and 2.1.4. In the finite element program the modified Coulomb<br />

criterion described previously is also used together with the<br />

following stresr-strain model and it should be emphasized that<br />

any failure criterion can be employed in connection with the described<br />

constitutive model, and no change as such is necessary<br />

because the criterion in question i s involved only througn the<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> the nonlinearity index, as defined.<br />

2.2.1. <strong>Nonlinear</strong>ity index<br />

Let us now define a convenient ir ;asure for the given loading in<br />

relation to the failure surface. First <strong>of</strong> all, we have to determine<br />

to which failure state the actual stress state should relate.<br />

Although there is an infinite number <strong>of</strong> possibilities,<br />

four essentially different types can be identified. To achieve<br />

a simple illustration, we will at present adopt as failure criterion<br />

the Mohr criterion shown in fig. 1 a), which also shows<br />

the actual stress state given by a, and o~. Failure can be obtained<br />

by increasing the a,-value as shown by circle I, or alternatively<br />

by fixing the (o, + o,)/2-value as shown by circle II.<br />

However, tensile stresses may then be involved in the failure

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!