Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures
Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures
Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
- 36 -<br />
affecting the descending curve in the post-failure region. Eq.<br />
(3) is a four-parameter expression determined by the parameters<br />
a , e , E., and D, and it infers that the initial slope is E.,<br />
and that there is a zero slope at failure, where (a,e) = (- c ,<br />
-e ) satisfies the equation. The parameter D determines the postfailure<br />
behaviour, and even though there are some indications <strong>of</strong><br />
this behaviour, e.g. Karsan and Jirsa U969),the precise form <strong>of</strong><br />
this part <strong>of</strong> the curve is unknown and is in fact, not obtained<br />
by a standard uniaxial compressive test. Therefore, the actual<br />
value <strong>of</strong> D is simply chosen so that a convenient post-failure<br />
curve results. However, there are certain limitations to D, if<br />
eq. (3) is to reflect: (1) an increasing function without inflexion<br />
points before failure; (2) a decreasing function with at<br />
most one inflexion point after failure; (3) a residual strength<br />
equal to zero after sufficiently large strain. To achieve these<br />
features A > 4/3 must hold, and the parameter D is subject to<br />
the following restrictions<br />
(1-35A) 2 < D _< l+A(A-2) when A < 2;<br />
0 _< D 4/3 is in practice not a restriction, and, in<br />
fact, eq. (3) provides a very flexible procedure to simulate the<br />
uniaxial stress-strain curve. For instance, the proposal <strong>of</strong> Saenz<br />
(1964) follows when D = 1, the Hognestad parabola (1951) follows<br />
when A = 2 and D = 0, and the suggestion <strong>of</strong> Desayi and Krishnan<br />
(1964) follows when A = 2 and D = 1. In addition, different postfailure<br />
behaviours can be simulated by means <strong>of</strong> the parameter D<br />
and this affects only the behaviour before failure insignificantly.<br />
This is shown in fig. 3, where A = 2 is assumed and where<br />
the limits <strong>of</strong> n are given by zero and unity.<br />
Using simple algebra, eq. (3) can be solved to obtain the actual<br />
secant value E<br />
s<br />
<strong>of</strong> Young's modulus. The expression for E<br />
s<br />
con-<br />
tains the actual stress in terms <strong>of</strong> the ratio - 0/0 . For unic<br />
axial compressive loading £ = - a/a<br />
for E<br />
holds, and the expression<br />
can therefore be generalized to triaxial compressive load-