13.06.2014 Views

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 15'J -<br />

insight into the physical behaviour <strong>of</strong> a structure. This was<br />

demonstrated using figures <strong>of</strong> crack developments and stress<br />

distributions. Figures showing contour lines <strong>of</strong> the nonlinearity<br />

index proved to be very advantageous when evaluating failure<br />

regions and failure modes. Using the standard version <strong>of</strong> the<br />

program, the effect <strong>of</strong> using the two different failure criteria<br />

was evaluated and, as expected, use <strong>of</strong> the writer's criterion<br />

resulted in the closest agreement with experimental data. The<br />

actual post-failure behaviour <strong>of</strong> concrete may be expected to<br />

have a large influence on those stress redistributions that<br />

take place, when the stresses are inhomogeneously distributed.<br />

This was indeed confirmed by the finite element analysis, and<br />

it was demonstrated that strain s<strong>of</strong>tening in the post-failure<br />

region must be included in a realistic constitutive model.<br />

Beams failing in shear represent problems <strong>of</strong> great theoretical<br />

and practical importance. With the standard version <strong>of</strong> the program<br />

using the writer's failure criterion and considering strain<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tening in the post-failure region, a close agreement with<br />

experimental data was demonstrated. This holds for the beam<br />

without stirrups as well as for the beam with stirrups. For<br />

both beams it was shown that the primary cause <strong>of</strong> failure is<br />

strain s<strong>of</strong>tening in the region adjacent to the load point. This<br />

strain s<strong>of</strong>tening causes a strain localization, which in turn<br />

results in a tendency to diagonal cracking. For the beam without<br />

shear reinforcement nothing prevents this tendency, and diagonal<br />

tension failure follows both experimentally and theoretically.<br />

For the beam with shear reinforcement, on the other hand, the<br />

stirrups resist the tendency to diagonal cracking and a shearcompression<br />

failure follows. Apart from the above mentioned,<br />

there is no principle difference in the behaviour <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

beams.However, it is important to note that modelling <strong>of</strong> strain<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tening seems to be mandatory for the prediction <strong>of</strong> diagonal<br />

cracking. Considering that shear is very dominant in the beams,<br />

the influence <strong>of</strong> different shear retention factors was evaluated<br />

to be relatively moderate. Variations, within realistic limits,<br />

<strong>of</strong> the uniaxial tensile strength <strong>of</strong> the concrete was found to<br />

influence the structural behaviour insignificantly. However,<br />

the snalysis showed that modelling <strong>of</strong> secondary cracking, where

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!