Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures
Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures
Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
- 51 -<br />
By use <strong>of</strong> eq. (3) we have then derived the final incremental<br />
equations<br />
deP . d£P llil (3_ €)<br />
J<br />
e<br />
where de is given by eq. (2) and a by eq. (1).<br />
If increasing proportional loading is considered it follows<br />
that<br />
J<br />
where the ratio s. ./a<br />
lj e<br />
that<br />
e<br />
is constant. From this equations follows<br />
^<br />
£P= U £?. ,*.)* (3-6)<br />
\3 13 13/<br />
Eqs. (5) and (6) hold exactly for increasing proportional loading.<br />
It is now assumed that they also apply to nonproportional<br />
loadings. However, while in the finite element program the reinforcement<br />
stresses are not directly determined, the total reinforcement<br />
strains are known as these are assumed to be identical<br />
to the concrete strains. It is therefore advantageous to derive explicitly<br />
the relation between reinforcement stresses and total<br />
strains. Noting that total strains e.. are composed <strong>of</strong> elastic<br />
strains e . . and plastic strains e?. i.e.<br />
e. . = e e . + e?. (3-7)<br />
13 13 13<br />
and working only with principal stresses and strains which is<br />
allowable here inasmuch as the corresponding principal directions<br />
always are assumed to coincide, we therefore write<br />
1 e P<br />
e 1 = - (o x - u(o 2 + o 3 )) + 35- (2 0;L - o 2 - o 3 )<br />
e<br />
e 2 = | (o 2 - u«^ + o 3 )) + fj- (2G 2 - o 1 - o 3 ><br />
e<br />
1 £ P<br />
c 3 = s (o 3 - .j( 0l + o 2 )) + jo - (2o 3 - °1 " a 2><br />
e