19.06.2014 Views

serikali ya mapinduzi zanzibar care tanzania and department

serikali ya mapinduzi zanzibar care tanzania and department

serikali ya mapinduzi zanzibar care tanzania and department

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

oth contributes 26.67 % <strong>and</strong> Shallow waters <strong>and</strong> coral reefs contributes 25.6% <strong>and</strong><br />

18.9 % respectively. Other remaining fishing grounds in totality contribute 28.83%.<br />

4.2.12.7 Threats to fisheries resources<br />

Marine biodiversity threats are divided into two aspects: proximate threats <strong>and</strong> root<br />

causes.<br />

Proximate threats<br />

The main human activities that damage marine organisms <strong>and</strong> ecosystems include:<br />

over exploitation, physical alterations <strong>and</strong> habitat loss, pollution, introduction of alien<br />

species <strong>and</strong> global climate changes.<br />

Root causes<br />

The main causes of biodiversity loss lie in demographic pressure <strong>and</strong> unsuitable use of<br />

natural resources; economic policies that fail to value the environment <strong>and</strong> its<br />

resources, insufficient knowledge <strong>and</strong> its poor application, <strong>and</strong> weakness in legal <strong>and</strong><br />

institutional systems (Dugan, 1990; WRI/IUCN/UNEP, 1992).<br />

4.2.12.8 Fisheries conservation<br />

Management of fisheries in Zanzibar, as in other developing countries has been<br />

problematic. The reason for such problems is due to the fact that management<br />

objectives are not defined:<br />

• The open-access nature of the fisheries, the shortage of alternative<br />

employment opportunities to the fishers <strong>and</strong> the poor economy could<br />

constrain the effort tailored to manage fisheries<br />

• Fisheries management plans in general do not exist; instead short time<br />

approaches are used in attempts to manage fisheries resources.<br />

4.2.3 Invertebrates (Lepidopterans <strong>and</strong> Odonata)<br />

Collection revealed a rich invertebrate fauna (477 individuals) as follows: A total of<br />

134 Butterflies were collected. These belonged to 35 species from eight families.<br />

Light trap <strong>and</strong> sweeping produced 195 moths belonging to 13 families. Lastly, 146<br />

Odonata (Dragonflies <strong>and</strong> Damselflies) representing nine species from three families<br />

were also collected. Several Odonata were not identified to species level.<br />

A checklist of the butterflies, moths <strong>and</strong> Odonata collected during this survey is given<br />

below. The number of individuals of the three groups from each transect is presented<br />

in Appendix 8a, 8b <strong>and</strong> 8c. Transect 3 had a significantly low abundance of butterflies<br />

<strong>and</strong> moths compared to the others. The highest abundance of butterflies <strong>and</strong> moths<br />

was obtained from transect 1 <strong>and</strong> 6.<br />

The number of singletons among butterflies was 14 species (41.18%), indicating that<br />

the survey was far from being exhaustive. Some species must have been missed<br />

during the survey. This low coverage reflects the short time spent in sampling. The<br />

large number of moths collected during this survey is a result of the effective light<br />

trap that was used.<br />

First records<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!