04.07.2014 Views

Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and Development ...

Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and Development ...

Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and Development ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

|Z| (ohm)<br />

Phase angle (degrees)<br />

10 6<br />

0<br />

10 5<br />

5 h<br />

23 h<br />

52 h<br />

73 h<br />

168 h<br />

336 h<br />

-80<br />

-60<br />

10 4<br />

-40<br />

10 3<br />

-20<br />

10 2<br />

10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

10 4 10 5<br />

Figure 3.39. Bode magnitude <strong>and</strong> phase angle plots of Neat Epoxy coating upon static<br />

exposure to 0.5M NaCl solution for a period of 2 weeks (336 h). The area exposed to the<br />

solution was 5.55 cm 2<br />

Figure 3.40a shows the total magnitude of impedance at 0.01 Hz of the coatings relative to the<br />

SrCr.Ep st<strong>and</strong>ard. Better response was seen from the bentonite pigmented coatings at the end of<br />

680 h with the impedance of 5ZnB.Ep (1.51 x10 6 Ω.cm 2 ) <strong>and</strong> 5LaB.Ep (1.79 x10 6 Ω.cm 2 ) in the<br />

same order of magnitude as SrCr.Ep (2.48 x 10 6 Ω.cm 2 ). Interestingly, Ce <strong>and</strong> Pr bentonite<br />

pigments showed inferior performance compared to the other bentonites. The water uptake by<br />

the pigmented coatings is causing the release of the Zn 2+ <strong>and</strong> La 3+ cations from the pigments <strong>and</strong><br />

promoting passivity of the interface.<br />

Figure 3.40b shows the variation in coating capacitances with time over 680 h relative to the<br />

SrCr.Ep control. There is some incongruence in the interpretation as the coating capacitances of<br />

the bentonites are too high on the order of 10 -7 to 10 -8 , which cannot be coating capacitances. As<br />

a check, the dielectric constant of a coating with thickness, t, is given by ε = Ct/Aε o , where C is<br />

capacitance, A is area <strong>and</strong> ε o is 8.85 x 10 -12 F/m. The thickness of the plain epoxy coating was<br />

measured to be approximately 35 μm <strong>and</strong> the area of the exposed coating was 5.55 cm 2 .<br />

Assuming the increase in capacitance during initial exposures up to 2 days is due to diffusional<br />

water uptake, the capacitance vs. t 1/2 curve was extrapolated to obtain the capacitance of the<br />

epoxy coating before exposure (t=0). The capacitance of the unpigmented epoxy coating was<br />

found to be 7.8715 x 10 -11 F/cm 2 . The dielectric constant of the epoxy coating was found to be<br />

3.1 which lies in the range of dielectric constants of polymers of 3 – 10 [108]. The thickness of 5<br />

wt% Ce bentonite pigment loaded epoxy coating was measured to be 55 μm <strong>and</strong> the capacitance<br />

of 5 wt% Ce bentonite pigment loaded epoxy coating was determined to be 2.162 x 10 -9 F/cm 2 .<br />

This gave a dielectric constant 130.43, which suggests that this value of capacitance does not<br />

correspond to that of the coating. Therefore, this implies that the high frequency capacitive<br />

response from the bentonite coatings except 5LaB.Ep was from the mixed capacitances of the<br />

coating <strong>and</strong> defects in the coating. It has to be noted that, despite bentonites degrading the barrier<br />

properties, Zn bentonite <strong>and</strong> La bentonite performed comparably to SrCr.Ep.<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!