04.07.2014 Views

Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and Development ...

Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and Development ...

Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and Development ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl)<br />

<strong>and</strong> uncoated AA2024 surfaces in this medium. The OCP values, which tend to quickly stabilize<br />

after solution exposure, are generally more noble for the TCP-coated samples by only 50-100<br />

mV. The OCP for the Alodine TM 5200-coated samples was also slightly more noble than that for<br />

the uncoated alloy. The OCP measurement was validated using ASTM G69-97. Measurements<br />

of polished <strong>and</strong> uncoated AA2024 yielded values of -612 mV (± 4) <strong>and</strong> -619 mV (± 5) at the<br />

95% confidence interval. These values are within the expected range of -600 to -620 mV vs<br />

Ag/AgCl.<br />

Figure 1.12b shows that R p for the TCP-coated samples is generally a factor of 8-10× greater<br />

than the uncoated samples. The nominal values were 5.42 × 10 4 ohm-cm 2 (± 0.31 × 10 4 ) for the<br />

uncoated samples <strong>and</strong> 4.03 × 10 5 ohm-cm 2 (± 1.15 × 10 5 ) for the coated samples (n≥3). These<br />

values are in good agreement with those obtained from EIS data. While the TCP coating<br />

provides some level of protection to AA2024, the 10 5 -10 6 ohm-cm 2 R p indicates the coating is<br />

not providing full barrier protection. Such barrier coatings would be expected to yield R p values<br />

on the order of 10 9 ohm-cm 2 . The polarization resistance of the 5200-coated samples was<br />

nominally 1.77 × 10 5 ohm-cm 2 (± 0.65 × 10 5 ) (n=3). This value is 3-4× higher than the nominal<br />

value for the uncoated alloys but 3-4× lower than the nominal value for the TCP-coated samples.<br />

Therefore, assuming the general structure of the coatings is similar (i.e., hydrated ZrO 2 ), these<br />

results suggest that the Cr(III) in the TCP coating contributes to the passivation of AA2024.<br />

-0.20<br />

-0.25<br />

-0.30<br />

-0.35<br />

-0.40<br />

-0.45<br />

-0.50<br />

-0.55<br />

A.<br />

Uncoated<br />

TCP-coated<br />

-0.60<br />

-200 0 200 400 600 800 100012001400160018002000<br />

Time (seconds)<br />

Polarization Resistance (ohm-cm 2 )<br />

4.5x10 5<br />

4.0x10 5<br />

3.5x10 5<br />

3.0x10 5<br />

2.5x10 5<br />

2.0x10 5<br />

1.5x10 5<br />

1.0x10 5<br />

5.0x10 4<br />

0.0<br />

B.<br />

Uncoated<br />

TCP<br />

5200<br />

Figure 1.12. (A) Plots of the open circuit potential (OCP) versus time for bare, Alodine 5200-<br />

coated (Cr free) <strong>and</strong> TCP-coated AA 2024 samples in air-saturated 0.5 M Na 2 SO 4 . (B) Graphs of<br />

the polarization resistance, obtained from slow scan potentiodynamic polarization scans ±30 mV<br />

vs. OCP, for bare, Alodine TM 5200-coated <strong>and</strong> TCP-coated AA2024 samples in the same<br />

medium.<br />

Figure 1.13 shows typical slow-scan potentiodynamic polarization curves for bare, Alodine TM<br />

5200-coated <strong>and</strong> TCP-coated AA2024 samples. The measurements were made in air-saturated<br />

0.5 M Na 2 SO 4 . Similar to the data in Figure 1.12, the presence of either coating does not cause a<br />

significant shift in the OCP value. Both coatings do, however, produce attenuated anodic <strong>and</strong><br />

cathodic currents around the OCP. For example, the anodic current from the OCP to about 0.4 V<br />

vs Ag/AgCl is about a factor of 10× lower for the TCP-coated sample. Attenuated current is also<br />

seen during the cathodic sweep from the OCP to about -0.8 V vs Ag/AgCl. The cathodic current<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!