04.07.2014 Views

Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and Development ...

Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and Development ...

Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and Development ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pressure x Radius (kN/m)<br />

were created to study a number of parameters: adhesion after immersion in hot DI water (60 o C)<br />

using the constant infusion BT; adhesion using st<strong>and</strong>ard techniques such as ASTM D 4541 (pulloff<br />

test) <strong>and</strong> ASTM D3359 (tape test); corrosion resistance through ASTM B117, filiform<br />

corrosion, <strong>and</strong> EIS measurements at different times of exposure to 5 wt% NaCl; <strong>and</strong> surface<br />

characteristics of the treated surface prior to primer application using XPS, optical profilometer,<br />

<strong>and</strong> contact angle measurements using DI water. However, the samples were contaminated<br />

during the processing at NAVAIR. Figure 4.35 shows the results from the BT. Delaminated area<br />

was observed under an optical microscope for all the samples <strong>and</strong> no primer residue was found.<br />

The samples exhibited adhesive failure without fracture. As described above, previous<br />

experiments performed using acetoacetate, the same primer used for this batch of samples,<br />

showed that cleaning/deoxidizing step improved adhesion for samples non-treated with CC <strong>and</strong><br />

samples treated with NCP <strong>and</strong> TCP. However, this was not observed in this batch of samples.<br />

The maximum Pxr value decreased for NCP <strong>and</strong> TCP when the cleaning/deoxidizing step was<br />

included in the coating process. In addition, the adhesion strength values were very different<br />

from those calculated from the first batch of samples. The maximum Pxr value was measured<br />

<strong>and</strong> used for adhesion strength calculations taking into account the primer thickness <strong>and</strong> Young’s<br />

modulus. Table 4.7 displays the adhesion strength values obtained from the old <strong>and</strong> the new<br />

samples. The values for the same coating system were very different. The only two coating<br />

system that had similar adhesion strength were those that were neither cleaned nor deoxidized<br />

but treated with NCP <strong>and</strong> the cleaned/deoxidized <strong>and</strong> treated with TCP. The values of adhesion<br />

strength between batches differed by at least 8.79 J/m 2 for the rest of the coating systems.<br />

Therefore, the new coating systems obtained must be different from the old ones, even though<br />

the same commercial solutions were used in their preparation.<br />

0.3<br />

0.25<br />

0.2<br />

March 30 2012 NCNP 1<br />

Dotted lines --> Non-cleaned<br />

Solid lines --> Cleaned<br />

Non-pretreated<br />

PR (KN/m) NCNP 1<br />

PR (KN/m) NCNP 2<br />

PR (KN/m) 5200 o 1<br />

PR (KN/m) 5200 o 2<br />

PR (KN/m) SO 1<br />

PR (KN/m) SO 2<br />

PR (KN/m) 1200 o 1<br />

PR (KN/m) 1200 o 2<br />

PR (KN/m) CO 1<br />

PR (KN/m) CO 2<br />

PR (KN/m) cl 5200 1<br />

PR (KN/m) cl 5200 2<br />

PR (KN/m) cl surtec 1<br />

PR (KN/m) cl surtec 2<br />

0.15<br />

TCP<br />

0.1<br />

0.05<br />

NCP<br />

CCC<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Radius (mm)<br />

Figure 4.35. Pressure x radius trend for samples (a) non-cleaned/deoxidized <strong>and</strong> (b)<br />

cleaned/deoxidized <strong>and</strong> coated with AVIOX CF 37619.<br />

200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!