specific user groups (any invalids, sick people?); 81
Annex 6: Evaluation of Community Managed Mini Sewerage in Denpasar Background Terms of Reference (DRAFT) Between 2002 <strong>and</strong> 2006, <strong>and</strong> with the help of the German NGO BORDA, the NGO BaliFokus built five SANIMAS systems with household connections in five low-income communities of Denpasar. One more system is now under preparation. The services aim at providing low income households with an effective, clean <strong>and</strong> environmentally safe way to dispose of human excreta <strong>and</strong> grey water. They also aim at providing a lower-cost <strong>and</strong> effective alternative to off-site sewerage <strong>and</strong> sewage treatment. Objectives The objectives of the evaluation are - to describe, analyse <strong>and</strong> document the approaches, experiences <strong>and</strong> results of the communitymanaged mini sewerage services in six locations - to assess the costs, effectiveness, sustainability <strong>and</strong> equity of the services <strong>for</strong> men <strong>and</strong> women, including poor women <strong>and</strong> men - to determine the user satisfaction of men <strong>and</strong> women about the projects <strong>and</strong> the services, including poor women <strong>and</strong> men - to assess the impacts (positive <strong>and</strong> negative) from the processes <strong>and</strong> the service <strong>for</strong> women <strong>and</strong> men - to summarize the findings from the six case <strong>studies</strong> - to draw general lessons <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>mulate general recommendations <strong>for</strong> an exp<strong>and</strong>ed replication in the city sanitation strategy <strong>and</strong> action plan 2009-2015; - to photograph the services <strong>and</strong> the evaluation process Intended results Intended results of the activity are: - a gender <strong>and</strong> poverty specific comparative study on the costs, effectiveness, sustainability, equity <strong>and</strong> impacts of community managed mini sewerage - lessons on the social, technical, institutional, environmental <strong>and</strong> financial aspects - an outline <strong>for</strong> scaling up with quality in the medium term city plan 2009-15 - photos on positive <strong>and</strong> negative aspects - strengthened capacity of the city to commission <strong>and</strong> use sanitation social research - feedback of experience <strong>and</strong> results to policy makers, programme planners <strong>and</strong> managers <strong>and</strong> trainers; Proposed activities - to describe <strong>and</strong> analyse how men <strong>and</strong> women, <strong>and</strong> poor people, have participated in planning, design <strong>and</strong> construction, campaign management <strong>and</strong> financing, <strong>and</strong> how they now participate in O&M <strong>and</strong> follow up; - to assess the sanitation promotion <strong>and</strong> hygiene education activities, the period of time, the methods <strong>and</strong> materials used <strong>and</strong> the participation of local men <strong>and</strong> women in planning, design <strong>and</strong> sessions; - to assess the quality of design, construction, O&M, management, monitoring, cooperation (e.g. in sharing of in<strong>for</strong>mation, construction <strong>and</strong>/or financing), the direct <strong>and</strong> indirect costs of the toilets <strong>and</strong> the promotion programme, the system <strong>and</strong> equity of financing <strong>and</strong> the quality of financial management, bookkeeping <strong>and</strong> accountability of financial <strong>and</strong> programme management to the users; - to assess the degree of coverage <strong>and</strong> the access <strong>for</strong> poor households, the variations in coverage over time <strong>and</strong> the relationship between coverage <strong>and</strong> sustainability - to assess variation in use of the toilets by the different types of user groups (adult women, men; 82
- Page 1:
018530 - SWITCH Sustainable Water M
- Page 4 and 5:
Table of Contents From social ex
- Page 6 and 7:
From social exclusion to inclusion!
- Page 8 and 9:
were unable to form lobby groups wa
- Page 10 and 11:
018530 - SWITCH Sustainable Water M
- Page 12 and 13:
Executive Summary The Participatory
- Page 14 and 15:
Social Inclusion in Amrawy Amrawy a
- Page 16 and 17:
(including representatives of the e
- Page 18 and 19:
Table 1 : A number of local develop
- Page 20 and 21:
local market, the shops in which we
- Page 22 and 23:
018530 - SWITCH Sustainable Water M
- Page 24 and 25:
Executive Summary The Basic Urban S
- Page 26 and 27:
The local context Kotte wanted to b
- Page 28 and 29:
Photograph 2. Consultative meeting
- Page 30 and 31:
Composition of the Working Group at
- Page 32 and 33:
Eventually, the BUS project Working
- Page 34 and 35:
5. Any community development projec
- Page 36 and 37:
018530 - SWITCH Sustainable Water M
- Page 38 and 39:
Abstract This case study on citizen
- Page 40 and 41:
location. The longest distance from
- Page 42 and 43:
The SWITCH demonstration site The l
- Page 44 and 45:
In 2004, Wilhelmsburg counted 48.32
- Page 46 and 47:
This specific platform operates in
- Page 48 and 49:
). Until 2002, up to seven working
- Page 50 and 51:
Infrastructure development: develop
- Page 52 and 53: 2. The participation should start a
- Page 54 and 55: These examples make clear that the
- Page 56 and 57: the SWITCH programme. Anyway it is
- Page 58 and 59: References Baumann & Ackermann (199
- Page 60 and 61: Making urban sanitation strategies
- Page 62 and 63: Indonesia - an overview Urban Sanit
- Page 64 and 65: year due to bad sanitation 25 . A W
- Page 66 and 67: Outline of the case study The next
- Page 68 and 69: Fig 6 Grease trap and baffle reacto
- Page 70 and 71: court. In the peri-urban areas of P
- Page 72 and 73: hygiene and poor men‘s and women
- Page 74 and 75: Regulation and legislation Further
- Page 76 and 77: Eco-toilet Metal sheet door, tiled
- Page 78 and 79: conditions, operational procedures
- Page 80 and 81: - Make it possible to take up the c
- Page 82 and 83: esearch and participatory pre-plann
- Page 84 and 85: comprised of wards, neighbourhoods
- Page 86 and 87: Annex 1 : Community Self-Assessment
- Page 88 and 89: 14. RT/RW covers some uncovered cos
- Page 90 and 91: Proposed activities The research an
- Page 92 and 93: Annex 3: Community Self-Assessment
- Page 94 and 95: Options None of the teachers were t
- Page 96 and 97: pelaksana) Project activities and r
- Page 98 and 99: & plan. Choice of implementer & mon
- Page 100 and 101: support team 3. Mobilise women and
- Page 104 and 105: adolescent boys, girls; old women a
- Page 106 and 107: Denpasar Technical Administration M
- Page 108 and 109: Brazil and beyond: lessons from par
- Page 110 and 111: Participatory budgeting in Brazil T
- Page 112 and 113: Uruguay. Source: Adapted from: Wamp
- Page 114 and 115: However, PB has had success in very
- Page 116 and 117: Positive outcomes in the north of E
- Page 118 and 119: Public consultation on budgetary pl
- Page 120 and 121: independence but this underestimate
- Page 122 and 123: Positive outcomes of the MTA proces
- Page 124 and 125: people are ‗invited in‘, as cou
- Page 126 and 127: Some practical guidance Analyse the
- Page 128 and 129: Including marginalised groups in eq
- Page 130 and 131: Introduction and Background Introdu
- Page 132 and 133: In some cases, they did not have en
- Page 134 and 135: The EMPOWERS Project Guiding Princi
- Page 136 and 137: Participatory methods and tools Var
- Page 138 and 139: planning cycle, actions plan that w
- Page 140 and 141: such as political tensions, antagon
- Page 142 and 143: of around US$ 2-5 per person per ye
- Page 144 and 145: Important longer-term indicators of
- Page 146 and 147: http://www.irc.nl/content/download/
- Page 148: Annex 1 : Examples of Selected pilo