Good practices for Social inclusion - Case studies and summary

Options
None of the teachers were trained
Scores
0
Given
Score
One female teacher was trained 25
Benchmark: One male and one female teacher has been trained 50
In addition, they have shared training with other teachers 75
Ideal: In addition, they organise sanitation/hygiene promotion at home/in
community
100
8. Use of training
Options
Scores
Given
Score
None of the teachers took the training seriously and did not learn anything
Even those who attended seriously could not learn much (e.g., badly organised, bad
trainers, no educational material or poor quality material, etc.)
Benchmark: All those who attended seriously learnt the skill sufficiently, at least 1
is using it effectively, and good quality educational material has been provided and
is being used
In addition, teachers have prepared their own locally-relevant lessons and
educational materials for hygiene promotion
Ideal: In addition, they have attended refresher trainings 100
0
25
50
75
9. Quality of support
Options
No support (no training, no visits, no materials, no funds, etc.) during the
UNICEF project period
Officials have organized training for school teachers but have not visited the
school visit, and have given no other support
Benchmark: Officials have organized district-level teacher training, and
inspected the school Watsan facilities at least once during the UNICEF project
period
In addition, officials have made sure that adequate amounts of UNICEF-provided
educational material are available to teachers
Ideal: In addition, officials have responded to specific requests by teachers and
made funds available for improving hygiene behaviour and Watsan facilities in
schools
Scores
0
25
50
75
100
Given Score
73