Good practices for Social inclusion - Case studies and summary
Good practices for Social inclusion - Case studies and summary
Good practices for Social inclusion - Case studies and summary
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fig 6 Grease trap <strong>and</strong> baffle reactor Fig. 7 Rich households.... ....pay the same fees as the poor<br />
Communal sanitation blocks(MCKs)<br />
Sanitation blocks, known as M(<strong>and</strong>ir), C(ucil), K(akus) <strong>for</strong> bathing, laundry <strong>and</strong><br />
defecation, are widespread. They are managed by the municipality or the Rukun<br />
Tetangga or RT (=neighbourhood association). The usual fee is Rp 100 (about one US<br />
dollar cent) per visit. RTs use the collected funds <strong>for</strong> maintenance. Dem<strong>and</strong> is high,<br />
but payment capacity low. Poor women would like to earn extra income to finance the<br />
MCK use. When poorly managed, MCKs are disliked: they are dirty, smelly, lack<br />
water, have no separate sections <strong>for</strong> women <strong>and</strong> men <strong>and</strong> long queues at peak hours.<br />
People then prefer open defecation near water.<br />
Some neighbourhoods run MCKs well. In one Surakarta neighbourhood, the users<br />
voluntarily operated it on a roster basis. The women cleaned <strong>and</strong> disinfected toilets<br />
after use (Fig. 8) <strong>and</strong> collected payments during the day <strong>and</strong> their husb<strong>and</strong>s did so at<br />
night to ensure a 24 hours‘ service. A well with diesel pump provided water whenever<br />
piped water supply was interrupted. A mixed committee did the overall management.<br />
The facility was very clean, but too small to meet peak time dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />
An alternative piloted in Denpasar is the MCK+. This includes sludge treatment so<br />
that there is no untreated sludge disposal into rivers, a widespread urban sanitation<br />
problem (Fig. 11). The MCK+ is beautiful (Fig. 10), but its investment costs equalled<br />
that of 15 neighbourhood MCKs <strong>and</strong> it is not community-managed <strong>and</strong> cost-covering.<br />
The NGO employs the operator <strong>and</strong> manages the service. Not counting population<br />
growth, the city would need 19-30 years to serve all poor neighbourhoods with these<br />
facilities.<br />
Fig. 8 Cleaning after each use Fig. 9 Operator also disinfects Fig. 10 MCK+: pretty but costly<br />
Community campaign <strong>for</strong> on-site household toilets<br />
The agricultural town of Payakumbuh in Sumatra has a strong Health Department. It<br />
carried out a successful toilet campaign with poor refugees resettled in the city<br />
outskirts after a volcano outbreak. Within three months, 30 of the 40 households had<br />
47