08.09.2014 Views

Good practices for Social inclusion - Case studies and summary

Good practices for Social inclusion - Case studies and summary

Good practices for Social inclusion - Case studies and summary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fig 6 Grease trap <strong>and</strong> baffle reactor Fig. 7 Rich households.... ....pay the same fees as the poor<br />

Communal sanitation blocks(MCKs)<br />

Sanitation blocks, known as M(<strong>and</strong>ir), C(ucil), K(akus) <strong>for</strong> bathing, laundry <strong>and</strong><br />

defecation, are widespread. They are managed by the municipality or the Rukun<br />

Tetangga or RT (=neighbourhood association). The usual fee is Rp 100 (about one US<br />

dollar cent) per visit. RTs use the collected funds <strong>for</strong> maintenance. Dem<strong>and</strong> is high,<br />

but payment capacity low. Poor women would like to earn extra income to finance the<br />

MCK use. When poorly managed, MCKs are disliked: they are dirty, smelly, lack<br />

water, have no separate sections <strong>for</strong> women <strong>and</strong> men <strong>and</strong> long queues at peak hours.<br />

People then prefer open defecation near water.<br />

Some neighbourhoods run MCKs well. In one Surakarta neighbourhood, the users<br />

voluntarily operated it on a roster basis. The women cleaned <strong>and</strong> disinfected toilets<br />

after use (Fig. 8) <strong>and</strong> collected payments during the day <strong>and</strong> their husb<strong>and</strong>s did so at<br />

night to ensure a 24 hours‘ service. A well with diesel pump provided water whenever<br />

piped water supply was interrupted. A mixed committee did the overall management.<br />

The facility was very clean, but too small to meet peak time dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

An alternative piloted in Denpasar is the MCK+. This includes sludge treatment so<br />

that there is no untreated sludge disposal into rivers, a widespread urban sanitation<br />

problem (Fig. 11). The MCK+ is beautiful (Fig. 10), but its investment costs equalled<br />

that of 15 neighbourhood MCKs <strong>and</strong> it is not community-managed <strong>and</strong> cost-covering.<br />

The NGO employs the operator <strong>and</strong> manages the service. Not counting population<br />

growth, the city would need 19-30 years to serve all poor neighbourhoods with these<br />

facilities.<br />

Fig. 8 Cleaning after each use Fig. 9 Operator also disinfects Fig. 10 MCK+: pretty but costly<br />

Community campaign <strong>for</strong> on-site household toilets<br />

The agricultural town of Payakumbuh in Sumatra has a strong Health Department. It<br />

carried out a successful toilet campaign with poor refugees resettled in the city<br />

outskirts after a volcano outbreak. Within three months, 30 of the 40 households had<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!