Good practices for Social inclusion - Case studies and summary

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Making urban sanitation strategies of six Indonesian cities more pro-poor and gender-equitable: the case of ISSDP A case study on social inclusion for SWITCH Christine Sijbesma and Joep Verhagen 15 (May 2008) 15 IRC international Water and Sanitation Centre (sijbesma@irc.nl and verhagen@irc.nl ) 39
Abstract This case study addresses how the gender equity and pro-poor approaches were strengthened in the integrated sanitation strategies of six Indonesian cities. This was done in the framework of the Indonesian Sector Sanitation Development Project (ISSDP). The cities are located in different parts of Indonesia and have different environmental, social, economic and cultural conditions. The work was demandresponsive: the six had come forward to improve city sanitation and hygiene in an integrated manner. In three short-term missions, already existing equity, gender and pro-poor approaches were identified and analysed. Subsequently, a strategy was developed to improve them in close cooperation with the city sanitation platforms and ISSDP. This resulted in an increased gender and poverty focus in the city-level sanitation and hygiene strategies and proposed pilot projects. The paper describes the proposed measures in detail. The concluding sections present lessons from the approach and outcomes for the SWITCH project and a conclusion on the similarities and differences with learning alliances. For more information please contact: Christine Sijbesma (sijbesma@irc.nl ) or Joep Verhagen (verhagen@irc.nl) who leads the SWITCH Work Package on Social Inclusion. SWITCH (Sustainable Water Management Improves Tomorrow’s Cities’ Health) is a research partnership supported by the European Community (Framework 6 Programme) and its partners www.switchurbanwater.eu/learningalliances 40
Page 1:
018530 - SWITCH Sustainable Water M
Page 4 and 5:
Table of Contents From social ex
Page 6 and 7:
From social exclusion to inclusion!
Page 8 and 9:
were unable to form lobby groups wa
Page 10 and 11: 018530 - SWITCH Sustainable Water M
Page 12 and 13: Executive Summary The Participatory
Page 14 and 15: Social Inclusion in Amrawy Amrawy a
Page 16 and 17: (including representatives of the e
Page 18 and 19: Table 1 : A number of local develop
Page 20 and 21: local market, the shops in which we
Page 24 and 25: Executive Summary The Basic Urban S
Page 26 and 27: The local context Kotte wanted to b
Page 28 and 29: Photograph 2. Consultative meeting
Page 30 and 31: Composition of the Working Group at
Page 32 and 33: Eventually, the BUS project Working
Page 34 and 35: 5. Any community development projec
Page 38 and 39: Abstract This case study on citizen
Page 40 and 41: location. The longest distance from
Page 42 and 43: The SWITCH demonstration site The l
Page 44 and 45: In 2004, Wilhelmsburg counted 48.32
Page 46 and 47: This specific platform operates in
Page 48 and 49: ). Until 2002, up to seven working
Page 50 and 51: Infrastructure development: develop
Page 52 and 53: 2. The participation should start a
Page 54 and 55: These examples make clear that the
Page 56 and 57: the SWITCH programme. Anyway it is
Page 58 and 59: References Baumann & Ackermann (199
Page 62 and 63: Indonesia - an overview Urban Sanit
Page 64 and 65: year due to bad sanitation 25 . A W
Page 66 and 67: Outline of the case study The next
Page 68 and 69: Fig 6 Grease trap and baffle reacto
Page 70 and 71: court. In the peri-urban areas of P
Page 72 and 73: hygiene and poor men‘s and women
Page 74 and 75: Regulation and legislation Further
Page 76 and 77: Eco-toilet Metal sheet door, tiled
Page 78 and 79: conditions, operational procedures
Page 80 and 81: - Make it possible to take up the c
Page 82 and 83: esearch and participatory pre-plann
Page 84 and 85: comprised of wards, neighbourhoods
Page 86 and 87: Annex 1 : Community Self-Assessment
Page 88 and 89: 14. RT/RW covers some uncovered cos
Page 90 and 91: Proposed activities The research an
Page 92 and 93: Annex 3: Community Self-Assessment
Page 94 and 95: Options None of the teachers were t
Page 96 and 97: pelaksana) Project activities and r
Page 98 and 99: & plan. Choice of implementer & mon
Page 100 and 101: support team 3. Mobilise women and
Page 102 and 103: specific user groups (any invalids,
Page 104 and 105: adolescent boys, girls; old women a
Page 106 and 107: Denpasar Technical Administration M
Page 108 and 109: Brazil and beyond: lessons from par
Page 110 and 111:
Participatory budgeting in Brazil T
Page 112 and 113:
Uruguay. Source: Adapted from: Wamp
Page 114 and 115:
However, PB has had success in very
Page 116 and 117:
Positive outcomes in the north of E
Page 118 and 119:
Public consultation on budgetary pl
Page 120 and 121:
independence but this underestimate
Page 122 and 123:
Positive outcomes of the MTA proces
Page 124 and 125:
people are ‗invited in‘, as cou
Page 126 and 127:
Some practical guidance Analyse the
Page 128 and 129:
Including marginalised groups in eq
Page 130 and 131:
Introduction and Background Introdu
Page 132 and 133:
In some cases, they did not have en
Page 134 and 135:
The EMPOWERS Project Guiding Princi
Page 136 and 137:
Participatory methods and tools Var
Page 138 and 139:
planning cycle, actions plan that w
Page 140 and 141:
such as political tensions, antagon
Page 142 and 143:
of around US$ 2-5 per person per ye
Page 144 and 145:
Important longer-term indicators of
Page 146 and 147:
http://www.irc.nl/content/download/
Page 148:
Annex 1 : Examples of Selected pilo
show all

Good practices for Social inclusion - Case studies and summary

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?