Good practices for Social inclusion - Case studies and summary

More documents

Recommendations

Info

adolescent boys, girls; old women and men, children between 5 and 12, infants (do they get help and from whom?) and babies (locations where their stools are deposited?), and the reasons for non-use; - to find out how satisfied especially poor women and men are about the service, the toilets, their participation in planning and service delivery processes and the hygiene promotion - to assess the felt benefits as well as any negative impacts of men and women in users and nonuser families, both poor and less poor. Typical issues to be checked in the evaluation o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o whether they wanted the system and were ready to contribute/accepted the proposed share; where to locate the system; who can be connected (the catchment area); how much the community and individual user households would pay to the investment costs; the payment system for the investment share, e.g. flat or weighed, in a lump sum or instalments, with or without interest; who would operate and maintain the system and if the operators will be male, female or both; what other tasks the operator(s) would do (e.g. in solid waste collection/recycling) and the salaries to be paid to the operator and other functionaries doing regular work, e.g. the tariff collector/treasurer; the estimated yearly O&M costs; the type of tariff (flat or weighed), amount and criteria and system for allocation of tariff level the link between number of users and the tariff; the amount, frequency, manner and place of payment and work involved; the selection and composition of the management committee including participation of women and men (poor and less poor) in the decision-making and as committee members, and the choice of functionaries (chair, treasurer, secretary etc.) – who choose them and on what criteria? the agreed term of office and changes in composition (frequency, reasons and selection method) the functioning of the committee (frequency of meetings, attendance of members, agendas, decision making, decisions, follow-up) the training of the operator(s) and committee members (who was trained in what, how long, how, where, to what effects), including refresher training and training for new members the financial management, e.g. the budget and accounts system, rules on non-payments, the bookkeeping, when and how and to whom the committee account for management and financing, auditing of the books by a local audit committee. the financial performance – who pays/pays not and why, actions taken and effectiveness, income and expenditures, type and amount of costs covered and not covered technical performance in operation, maintenance, repairs any environmental, health and/or safety risks satisfaction of poor and non poor women and men users and non users with service and management 83
Annex 7 : City SWM –No. Male/Female Workers at Primary Level Blitar Solo Denpas ar Banjar masin Payaku mbuh Jambi City SW Collection Segregation at Source (TPS) Dump (TPA) Scavenging Street sweepers SW Collection Segregation at Source (TPS) Dump (TPA) Scavenging Street sweepers SW Collection Segregation at Source (TPS) Dump (TPA) Scavenging Street sweepers SW Collection Segregation at Source (TPS) Dump (TPA) Scavenging Street sweepers SW Collection Segregation at Source (TPS) Dump (TPA) Scavenging Street sweepers SW Collection Segregation at Source (TPS) Dump (TPA) Scavenging Street sweepers By Municipali ty By Communit y (RT) By Informal Private Sector By Formal Private Sector M F M F M F M F City Solid Waste Management – Numbers of Male/Female Workers at Secondary+Tertiary Level and in Administration Blitar City Municipality Enterprise (1) Enterprise (2) NGO (1) NGO (2) Technical Men Wom en Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Administration Management Solo Technical Administration Management 84
Page 1:
018530 - SWITCH Sustainable Water M
Page 4 and 5:
Table of Contents From social ex
Page 6 and 7:
From social exclusion to inclusion!
Page 8 and 9:
were unable to form lobby groups wa
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Executive Summary The Participatory
Page 14 and 15:
Social Inclusion in Amrawy Amrawy a
Page 16 and 17:
(including representatives of the e
Page 18 and 19:
Table 1 : A number of local develop
Page 20 and 21:
local market, the shops in which we
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Executive Summary The Basic Urban S
Page 26 and 27:
The local context Kotte wanted to b
Page 28 and 29:
Photograph 2. Consultative meeting
Page 30 and 31:
Composition of the Working Group at
Page 32 and 33:
Eventually, the BUS project Working
Page 34 and 35:
5. Any community development projec
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Abstract This case study on citizen
Page 40 and 41:
location. The longest distance from
Page 42 and 43:
The SWITCH demonstration site The l
Page 44 and 45:
In 2004, Wilhelmsburg counted 48.32
Page 46 and 47:
This specific platform operates in
Page 48 and 49:
). Until 2002, up to seven working
Page 50 and 51:
Infrastructure development: develop
Page 52 and 53:
2. The participation should start a
Page 54 and 55: These examples make clear that the
Page 56 and 57: the SWITCH programme. Anyway it is
Page 58 and 59: References Baumann & Ackermann (199
Page 60 and 61: Making urban sanitation strategies
Page 62 and 63: Indonesia - an overview Urban Sanit
Page 64 and 65: year due to bad sanitation 25 . A W
Page 66 and 67: Outline of the case study The next
Page 68 and 69: Fig 6 Grease trap and baffle reacto
Page 70 and 71: court. In the peri-urban areas of P
Page 72 and 73: hygiene and poor men‘s and women
Page 74 and 75: Regulation and legislation Further
Page 76 and 77: Eco-toilet Metal sheet door, tiled
Page 78 and 79: conditions, operational procedures
Page 80 and 81: - Make it possible to take up the c
Page 82 and 83: esearch and participatory pre-plann
Page 84 and 85: comprised of wards, neighbourhoods
Page 86 and 87: Annex 1 : Community Self-Assessment
Page 88 and 89: 14. RT/RW covers some uncovered cos
Page 90 and 91: Proposed activities The research an
Page 92 and 93: Annex 3: Community Self-Assessment
Page 94 and 95: Options None of the teachers were t
Page 96 and 97: pelaksana) Project activities and r
Page 98 and 99: & plan. Choice of implementer & mon
Page 100 and 101: support team 3. Mobilise women and
Page 102 and 103: specific user groups (any invalids,
Page 106 and 107: Denpasar Technical Administration M
Page 108 and 109: Brazil and beyond: lessons from par
Page 110 and 111: Participatory budgeting in Brazil T
Page 112 and 113: Uruguay. Source: Adapted from: Wamp
Page 114 and 115: However, PB has had success in very
Page 116 and 117: Positive outcomes in the north of E
Page 118 and 119: Public consultation on budgetary pl
Page 120 and 121: independence but this underestimate
Page 122 and 123: Positive outcomes of the MTA proces
Page 124 and 125: people are ‗invited in‘, as cou
Page 126 and 127: Some practical guidance Analyse the
Page 128 and 129: Including marginalised groups in eq
Page 130 and 131: Introduction and Background Introdu
Page 132 and 133: In some cases, they did not have en
Page 134 and 135: The EMPOWERS Project Guiding Princi
Page 136 and 137: Participatory methods and tools Var
Page 138 and 139: planning cycle, actions plan that w
Page 140 and 141: such as political tensions, antagon
Page 142 and 143: of around US$ 2-5 per person per ye
Page 144 and 145: Important longer-term indicators of
Page 146 and 147: http://www.irc.nl/content/download/
Page 148: Annex 1 : Examples of Selected pilo
show all

Good practices for Social inclusion - Case studies and summary

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?