Regional Land Transport Programme 2009 - 2010 (2MB) - Auckland ...
Regional Land Transport Programme 2009 - 2010 (2MB) - Auckland ...
Regional Land Transport Programme 2009 - 2010 (2MB) - Auckland ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
With respect to the tables (and headings) on the following pages, we<br />
have used the following nomenclature:<br />
Approved Organisations<br />
<strong>Auckland</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Authority – ARTA<br />
<strong>Auckland</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> Council – ARC<br />
NZTA Network and Highways Operations – HNO<br />
<strong>Auckland</strong> City Council – ACC<br />
Franklin District Council – FDC<br />
Manukau City Council – MCC<br />
North Shore City Council – NSCC<br />
Papakura District Council – PDC<br />
Rodney District Council – RDC<br />
Waitakere City Council – WCC<br />
Phase: refers to the stage of development (study, investigation,<br />
design, construction/implementation, etc).<br />
Work category: refers to the NZTA work category designation<br />
(refer to page F1-3 in the NZTA’s Planning, Programming and<br />
Funding Manual).<br />
Objectives: the main contribution this project will have towards the<br />
objectives of the New Zealand <strong>Transport</strong> Strategy, these being to:<br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
Assist economic development.<br />
Assist safety and personal security.<br />
Improve access and mobility.<br />
Protect and promote public health.<br />
Ensure environmental sustainability.<br />
Total cost ($): This is the amount of money the activity has been<br />
estimated to cost based on the accumulated cost information in<br />
LTP online.<br />
<strong>2009</strong>/10, <strong>2010</strong>/11, 2011/12 cost ($): This is the amount of money<br />
being requested for the identified activity and phase for that particular<br />
year in the RLTP. In the instances where the cell is blank or contains a<br />
dash, no amount of money was indicated.<br />
Seriousness and Urgency, Effectiveness and Efficiency: The<br />
prioritisation profile assigned to the activity based on ARTA’s<br />
prioritisation process (refer to Appendix 2). In some instances, the cell<br />
may contain a dash “–“ or NA.<br />
If a cell contains a dash “–“ (under efficiency) then the efficiency of<br />
the activity has not been determined, that is the project is at too early<br />
a stage for the BCR to have yet been calculated. In these cases<br />
schemes are profiled as if the BCR was Low until it is proved otherwise.<br />
This is used to differentiate between an activity that has a calculated<br />
Low efficiency (the benefit/cost ratio (BCR) is greater or equal to 1<br />
but less than 2), in which case L is used to indicate Low efficiency.<br />
Where NA is entered in a cell, then that particular activity does not<br />
require an assessment of the efficiency, generally (this is Studies and<br />
strategies, the Community <strong>Programme</strong>s and Administration).<br />
When further information about a project becomes known, for<br />
example when the BCR has been calculated or when the effectiveness<br />
of the proposed solution is reassessed because further information<br />
becomes available, it is likely that the prioritisation profile of the<br />
project will change.<br />
42