02.10.2014 Views

Regional Land Transport Programme 2009 - 2010 (2MB) - Auckland ...

Regional Land Transport Programme 2009 - 2010 (2MB) - Auckland ...

Regional Land Transport Programme 2009 - 2010 (2MB) - Auckland ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

With respect to the tables (and headings) on the following pages, we<br />

have used the following nomenclature:<br />

Approved Organisations<br />

<strong>Auckland</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Authority – ARTA<br />

<strong>Auckland</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> Council – ARC<br />

NZTA Network and Highways Operations – HNO<br />

<strong>Auckland</strong> City Council – ACC<br />

Franklin District Council – FDC<br />

Manukau City Council – MCC<br />

North Shore City Council – NSCC<br />

Papakura District Council – PDC<br />

Rodney District Council – RDC<br />

Waitakere City Council – WCC<br />

Phase: refers to the stage of development (study, investigation,<br />

design, construction/implementation, etc).<br />

Work category: refers to the NZTA work category designation<br />

(refer to page F1-3 in the NZTA’s Planning, Programming and<br />

Funding Manual).<br />

Objectives: the main contribution this project will have towards the<br />

objectives of the New Zealand <strong>Transport</strong> Strategy, these being to:<br />

><br />

><br />

><br />

><br />

><br />

Assist economic development.<br />

Assist safety and personal security.<br />

Improve access and mobility.<br />

Protect and promote public health.<br />

Ensure environmental sustainability.<br />

Total cost ($): This is the amount of money the activity has been<br />

estimated to cost based on the accumulated cost information in<br />

LTP online.<br />

<strong>2009</strong>/10, <strong>2010</strong>/11, 2011/12 cost ($): This is the amount of money<br />

being requested for the identified activity and phase for that particular<br />

year in the RLTP. In the instances where the cell is blank or contains a<br />

dash, no amount of money was indicated.<br />

Seriousness and Urgency, Effectiveness and Efficiency: The<br />

prioritisation profile assigned to the activity based on ARTA’s<br />

prioritisation process (refer to Appendix 2). In some instances, the cell<br />

may contain a dash “–“ or NA.<br />

If a cell contains a dash “–“ (under efficiency) then the efficiency of<br />

the activity has not been determined, that is the project is at too early<br />

a stage for the BCR to have yet been calculated. In these cases<br />

schemes are profiled as if the BCR was Low until it is proved otherwise.<br />

This is used to differentiate between an activity that has a calculated<br />

Low efficiency (the benefit/cost ratio (BCR) is greater or equal to 1<br />

but less than 2), in which case L is used to indicate Low efficiency.<br />

Where NA is entered in a cell, then that particular activity does not<br />

require an assessment of the efficiency, generally (this is Studies and<br />

strategies, the Community <strong>Programme</strong>s and Administration).<br />

When further information about a project becomes known, for<br />

example when the BCR has been calculated or when the effectiveness<br />

of the proposed solution is reassessed because further information<br />

becomes available, it is likely that the prioritisation profile of the<br />

project will change.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!