13.10.2014 Views

Stander Symposium abstract book - University of Dayton

Stander Symposium abstract book - University of Dayton

Stander Symposium abstract book - University of Dayton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

POSTER SESSION 1<br />

wealth <strong>of</strong> research regarding the associations between forgiveness and rumination as well as perfectionism and rumination, all three concepts <strong>of</strong><br />

self-forgiveness, rumination, and perfectionism have never been studied in conjunction before. Given past research, I hypothesize that rumination<br />

mediates the relationship between perfectionism and self-forgiveness. More specifically, I predict that increased levels <strong>of</strong> perfectionism will be<br />

associated with increased levels <strong>of</strong> rumination, which, in turn, will result in decreased levels <strong>of</strong> self-forgiveness.<br />

The Relationship between Narcissism, Overconfidence and Risky Behavior<br />

Presenter(s): Arianna T Arnett, Adam Barnas, Megan K Dailey, Jamie L Flannery, Kristen A Kemp,<br />

Peter M Sismour<br />

Advisor(s): Susan T Davis<br />

Psychology - Independent Research<br />

Previous research has shown that overconfidence, the belief that ability to perform a task is greater than actual ability, is associated with risky<br />

behavior (Campbell, Goodie, & Foster, 2004). The present research evaluated the relationship between overconfidence, risky behavior, and narcissism<br />

(confidence and feelings <strong>of</strong> self-sufficiency, <strong>of</strong>ten in the extreme). Male and female undergraduate participants were given a series <strong>of</strong><br />

questionnaires and participated in several tasks to assess overconfidence, narcissism, risky behavior and the need for achievement. Participants<br />

were assigned to either an experimental condition, where participants bet on their ability to answer a series <strong>of</strong> general knowledge questions, or a<br />

control condition, where participants rated their confidence in their ability to answer the same series <strong>of</strong> general knowledge questions. To examine<br />

whether feedback had an effect on confidence, participants either received or did not receive feedback after answering each general knowledge<br />

question. We hypothesized that those who merely rated their confidence would show less signs <strong>of</strong> overconfidence than those who bet on the accuracy<br />

<strong>of</strong> their performance. Results have shown that the participants that were placed in the betting condition were notably more overconfident<br />

than those who were only asked to rate their confidence. We also predicted that narcissism would correlate with risky behavior in participants.<br />

Those who scored higher on a narcissism scale were also more likely to engage in risky behavior.<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> Visual and Proprioceptive Limb Information in Object Size and Affordance<br />

Judgments<br />

Presenter(s): Adam Barnas, Adam D Sitz<br />

Advisor(s): Benjamin R Kunz<br />

Psychology - Independent Research<br />

In the mirror illusion, visual information from a mirror reflection <strong>of</strong> one hand influences the perceived location <strong>of</strong> the other hand. Holmes, Crozier,<br />

and Spence (2004) demonstrated this visual capture effect on a spatial localization task in which visual information was found to influence<br />

reaching movements towards a target when the seen (in the mirror) and felt (proprioception) position <strong>of</strong> the hand did not match. In this present<br />

experiment, the conflict between vision and proprioception was examined by means <strong>of</strong> a task in which participants adjusted the physical<br />

distance between their two hands to match targets <strong>of</strong> different lengths. In each trial, participants viewed their visible hand and its reflection in<br />

a mirror, while their unseen hand was positioned at one <strong>of</strong> four locations located behind the mirror. At all times, the visible hand was positioned<br />

fourteen cm in front <strong>of</strong> the mirror, and as such, the unseen hand always appeared to be twenty-eight cm from the visible hand regardless <strong>of</strong> its<br />

actual position. While viewing their visible hand and its reflection, participants performed simultaneous finger movements with both hands to<br />

maximize the illusion. Participants then viewed a target block and repositioned their unseen hand such that the distance between their hands<br />

matched the block length. Results suggest that movement <strong>of</strong> the unseen hand relative to the visible hand was biased by visual information from<br />

the mirror, and this bias increased as the visual-proprioceptive conflict increased. These results suggest that the visual information about hand<br />

position overrode the proprioceptive information when the hands were used to indicate perceived object length. Additional experiments will use<br />

affordance judgments to further investigate how visual and proprioceptive information affect judgments <strong>of</strong> limb location and action capabilities.<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!