Strategic IT Planning for Public Organizations: A Toolkit - UNU-IIST ...
Strategic IT Planning for Public Organizations: A Toolkit - UNU-IIST ...
Strategic IT Planning for Public Organizations: A Toolkit - UNU-IIST ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>IT</strong> <strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Toolkit</strong> – Section 7: Strategy Implementation<br />
46<br />
Tools: The template document does not provide any guide <strong>for</strong> this task. See resources in Appendix A<br />
<strong>for</strong> tools to support the implementation of this task.<br />
Related Tasks: This requires an initial list of requirements, produced from the Initiative<br />
development task.<br />
Comments: Varying degree of <strong>for</strong>mality can be employed in the definition of the prioritization<br />
framework. For projects involving high level of cost and risks, there must be a rational basis <strong>for</strong><br />
deciding on the priorities. It must also be noted <strong>for</strong> the eventual implementation of the initiatives<br />
sound business cases must be established <strong>for</strong> them. The involvement of stakeholders in the validation<br />
steps is essential to obtain support <strong>for</strong> the initiatives during execution. A very important consideration<br />
in the prioritization of initiatives is the availability of resources and specifically budgets <strong>for</strong> initiatives.<br />
It would be more pragmatic to focus on initiatives with ready budget and other resources than those<br />
requiring substantial proposal <strong>for</strong> securing requisite resources.<br />
7.3 Summary<br />
This section shows how the initiatives are developed from first priority objectives and later prioritized<br />
based on agreed prioritization framework. These two tasks are often considered outside the scope of a<br />
strategic planning process. There are arguments that a comprehensive implementation plan should be<br />
developed as a separate project outside the planning activity. However, even in cases where the<br />
development of the initiatives list has been done by the strategy team, the implementation team could<br />
use the outcomes as input <strong>for</strong> their own processes. There are growing pressures in linking resource<br />
allocation to per<strong>for</strong>mance in the public administration. Without an alignment of the budgetary and<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance system, good innovations could be denied required resources due to the prevalent budget<br />
arrangement. There<strong>for</strong>e, there is a need <strong>for</strong> an organizational intervention to ensure that initiatives are<br />
fairly considered largely on merit or per<strong>for</strong>mance history.<br />
Report No. 417, May 2009<br />
<strong>UNU</strong>-<strong>IIST</strong>, P. O. Box 3058, Macao