01.11.2014 Views

Business finance : theory and practice

Business finance : theory and practice

Business finance : theory and practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 8 • Sources of long-term <strong>finance</strong><br />

As owners of the business, the ordinary shareholders bear the greatest risk. If the<br />

business trades unsuccessfully, the ordinary shareholders are the first to suffer in<br />

terms of lack of dividends <strong>and</strong>, probably, declines in the market value of their shares.<br />

If the business collapses (is put into liquidation) it is the ordinary shareholders who<br />

will be at the bottom of the list with a claim for repayment of their investment.<br />

On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the fruits of the business’s success principally benefit ordinary<br />

shareholders; other participants – labour, lenders, suppliers <strong>and</strong> so forth – tend to earn<br />

returns not related to the business’s success. Thus, once the claims of these other participants<br />

are met, the balance accrues to the ordinary shareholders.<br />

Nominal values<br />

‘<br />

When a business is first established, a decision is made about how much equity <strong>finance</strong><br />

(the law requires that there is some) it wishes to raise <strong>and</strong> into how many shares this<br />

is to be divided. If, for example, the decision is that £1 million needs to be raised, this<br />

could be in the form of two shares of nominal value (or par value) £500,000 each, 1 million<br />

shares of £1 each, 200,000 shares of £5 each, or (more likely) 2 million shares of<br />

£0.50 each. Which of these, or of any one of the almost infinite number of other possibilities,<br />

is decided upon, is a matter of the judgement of the promoters of the business.<br />

In making this decision, probably the major factor is marketability. Most investors<br />

would not find shares of very large nominal value very attractive, as this would make<br />

it difficult to invest an exact amount of money in the business. If the shares were of<br />

nominal value £50, an investor who wished to invest £275 could not do so. The choice<br />

would be between five or six shares. If the shares were of £10 nominal value the<br />

investor could get fairly close to the target of £275 (27 or 28 shares). It seems to be<br />

believed that large nominal value shares are not as readily marketable as those of<br />

smaller denomination. Certainly large-denomination shares are very rare in <strong>practice</strong>.<br />

Few ordinary shares have nominal values larger than £1 each, with most being smaller<br />

than this.<br />

Once the business has invested its capital <strong>and</strong> has started to trade, the market value<br />

of its ordinary shares will probably move away from the nominal value, as a result of<br />

market forces. Further issues of ordinary shares will normally be priced by reference<br />

to current market prices: that is, businesses will seek to issue further ordinary shares<br />

at the highest price that the market will bear. In fact, nominal values cease to have<br />

much significance once the business has started trading. This is evidenced by the fact<br />

that, in the USA, which has similar corporate financing arrangements to those of the<br />

UK, shares of no par (or nominal) value are not unusual.<br />

The decision on nominal value is not irrevocable; businesses may subsequently split<br />

or consolidate nominal values. For example, a business whose ordinary shares have<br />

a nominal value of £1 each may split them into shares of £0.50 each. In <strong>practice</strong> this<br />

is easily accomplished, <strong>and</strong> culminates in each ordinary shareholder being sent a<br />

replacement share certificate showing twice as many £0.50 shares as the previous<br />

number of £1 ones. As we have seen, the objective of such a move seems to be to<br />

reduce the unit price to make the shares more marketable.*<br />

* If the shares are, in fact, rendered more attractive by splitting, logically the split would increase the<br />

market value of a particular investor’s holding. The evidence seems to indicate that this does not happen<br />

in <strong>practice</strong>. See Copel<strong>and</strong>, Weston <strong>and</strong> Shastri (2004) for a discussion of some tests relating to this<br />

point.<br />

220

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!