18.11.2014 Views

AIDJEX Bulletin #40 - Polar Science Center - University of Washington

AIDJEX Bulletin #40 - Polar Science Center - University of Washington

AIDJEX Bulletin #40 - Polar Science Center - University of Washington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

equations is classified as hyperbolic, parabolic, or elliptic, depending on<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> real characteristic directions that exist. In plasticity<br />

problems this will be determined by the state <strong>of</strong> stress and the type and<br />

shape <strong>of</strong> yield surface that is used. In statically indeterminate problems<br />

dealing with materials described by a normal flow rule theremaybearepeated<br />

root in the characteristic determinant. To the authors' knowledge, this<br />

problem has not been dealt with in the plasticity literature. It is recognized<br />

by Martin (1975), who shows that the problem may be circumvented by<br />

neglecting the advection term in momentum balance. This has the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

uncoupling the stress equations from the velocity equations so that two<br />

independent systems may be solved.<br />

In the field <strong>of</strong> plasticity <strong>of</strong> metals, Hill (1950) solves problems with<br />

no body forces or advection. He discu6ses the possibility <strong>of</strong> parabolic and<br />

elliptic systems and obtains characteristic relations in the hyperbolic case.<br />

The well-known theorem due to Hencky for construction <strong>of</strong> slipline networks<br />

results from this assumption. Martin (1975) solves the same type<strong>of</strong>problems,<br />

but uses the null-vector technique, which is more easily generalized to<br />

include body forces and advection.<br />

The important distinction between plane strain and plane stress in<br />

plasticity is discussed by Hodge (1950), and Prager and Hodge (1951), as<br />

well as Hill (1950). It must be remembered that plane stress and strain are<br />

special cases <strong>of</strong> three-dimensional models, and our sea ice model is not<br />

derived from a three-dimensional model; it is a two-dimensional model.<br />

In plane strain the von Mises and Tresca yield conditions coincide,<br />

while in plane stress they do not. In plane strain the characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

the stress equations exist at every point; they form an orthogonal network<br />

and are identical with the lines <strong>of</strong> maximum shearing stress and maximum<br />

shearing strain. In plane stress, if the Tresca yield condition is used<br />

together with the stress-strain law <strong>of</strong> von Mises, the stress equations may<br />

be hyperbolic in part <strong>of</strong> the plastic domain and parabolic in the rest.<br />

Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the velocity equations differ from those <strong>of</strong> the stress<br />

equations in this case. If the von Mises condition is used in plane stress,<br />

the stress and velocity characteristics coincide, but the system may be<br />

hyperbolic, parabolic, or elliptic.<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!