05.11.2012 Views

Download - German Historical Institute London

Download - German Historical Institute London

Download - German Historical Institute London

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The New <strong>German</strong>y and Migration in Europe<br />

Many young people were left in a normative vacuum during the<br />

phase of democratization. The old ideals that had been inculcated at<br />

school were no longer valid, and after 40 years of socialist rule, they<br />

could not look back to the stabilizing traditions of a civil society. The<br />

ardently desired economic new start began with job losses and<br />

unemployment. At this difficult time, foreigners and asylum seekers<br />

became scapegoats who were held responsible for the social and economic<br />

malaise. Added to this was a psychological element. Through<br />

their displays of violence and racism, right-wing young people publicly<br />

violated the taboos of the anti-Nazi consensus in the �ederal<br />

Republic of <strong>German</strong>y. They found being right-wing ‘cool’ and provocative,<br />

and thus enjoyable. Indeed, most of these young people<br />

did not have a firmly established, radical right-wing view of the<br />

world.<br />

In this tense situation in the early 1990s, <strong>German</strong> immigration policy<br />

changed as the result of a compromise between the ruling coalition<br />

of Christian parties and Liberals, and the Social Democratic<br />

opposition. The SPD signalled its willingness to support a change in<br />

the right of asylum guaranteed in Article 16 of the Basic Law. This<br />

ensured the two-thirds majority in the Bundestag that is required for<br />

any constitutional change in <strong>German</strong>y. In return, the CDU/CSU<br />

were prepared to accept restrictions on the immigration of ethnic<br />

<strong>German</strong>s and confirmed that they would consider a comprehensive<br />

review of immigration law. Marshall correctly points out that this<br />

was not a fair agreement which satisfied both political camps, as the<br />

SPD had to make more painful concessions than the two union parties.<br />

�or many Social Democrats, the fundamental right to political<br />

asylum was a ‘symbol of <strong>German</strong>y’s continuing commitment to<br />

atonement for the past and to humanitarian values in the treatment<br />

of the persecuted of the day’ (p. 18). It had been accepted in the constitution<br />

in response to the persecution of political opponents during<br />

the Nazi period. A revision of the Basic Law which watered down the<br />

right to asylum seemed to many to be a betrayal of the founding principles<br />

of the �ederal Republic and of those Social Democrats, persecuted<br />

by the Nazis, who had found asylum abroad. The SPD none the<br />

less agreed because of the pressure applied by local politicians from<br />

its own ranks. Given the large numbers of refugees, these had been<br />

forced to turn sports halls and schools into temporary reception centres,<br />

which provoked bitter resistance on the part of the local people.<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!