Download - German Historical Institute London
Download - German Historical Institute London
Download - German Historical Institute London
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BOOK REVIEWS<br />
KARIN �RIEDRICH, The Other Prussia: Royal Prussia, Poland and Liberty,<br />
1569–1772 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), xxi +<br />
280 pp. ISBN 0 521 58335 7. £40.00. $US 64.95<br />
During the first half of the twentieth century, the Estate-based society<br />
of late medieval and early modern times fascinated historians from<br />
states with very different political systems. The International Historians’<br />
Congress held in Warsaw in 1933, at which east-central and<br />
eastern Europe figured much more prominently than they had done<br />
at any previous congress, represented an important breakthrough for<br />
comparative research on the European Estates. On the initiative of<br />
the Belgian historians Emil Lousse and Henri Pirenne, the foundations<br />
were laid for the Commission Internationale pour l’Histoire des<br />
Assemblées d’Etats, which came into being three years later. To the<br />
present day, the commission provides the central institutional framework<br />
for this branch of research. The considerable achievements<br />
which the commission notched up in its early years demonstrated<br />
that ‘Histoire comparative’, proclaimed as a programme at the Paris<br />
Congress of 1900, could usefully be applied to the topic of the Estates<br />
and their assemblies. But why did the scholars of eastern central Europe<br />
in particular study the history of the Estates? Long before and long after<br />
1918, the system of Estates provided a widely used platform on which<br />
to articulate social aspirations and to legitimize political actions, or, at<br />
times of crisis, to prop up national self-confidence. In more general<br />
terms, the Estates were interesting as the bearers of national traditions<br />
and reform attempts, they expressed the potential for resistance to all<br />
forms of monarchical-autocratic state integration, and they stood for<br />
an assumed continuity from the corporative representative assemblies<br />
of the past to the parliamentary-democratic constitutional forms of the<br />
present. To sum up, it was no coincidence that historians in all the<br />
states created after the �irst World War from the Baltic to the Adriatic<br />
had a heightened interest in the culture of liberty of eastern central<br />
Europe. There were clearly peak times for working on this topic, and<br />
they can be correlated with political history. To this extent, to study this<br />
topic also involved a contemporary historical and political dimension.<br />
57