05.11.2012 Views

Download - German Historical Institute London

Download - German Historical Institute London

Download - German Historical Institute London

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CON�ERENCE REPORT<br />

Three Debates Revisited. Symposium to mark the 25th Anniversary<br />

of the <strong>German</strong> <strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>London</strong>, held at the GHIL on 15–16<br />

November 2001.<br />

The modern state in <strong>German</strong>y and Britain and explanatory models of<br />

state theory provided the unifying theme of the papers presented at<br />

the <strong>German</strong> <strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>’s 25th anniversary symposium, held<br />

at the GHIL’s premises in Bloomsbury Square. The individual sessions<br />

looked at the genesis of modern statehood c. 1600– 1800, its conceptual<br />

reflection in modern state and social theory (Otto Hintze,<br />

Max Weber), and the validity of functionalist versus intentionalist<br />

explanatory models of the <strong>German</strong> fascist state and regime.<br />

The symposium opened with three contributions discussing the<br />

main features of British and <strong>German</strong> state-building processes from<br />

the sixteenth to the eighteenth century. In his introductory speech,<br />

Hartmut Lehmann (Göttingen) drew attention to the emergence of<br />

denominational churches and the growth of confessional awareness<br />

as intellectual adjuncts, and to some extent preconditions, of these<br />

processes. Ronald G. Asch (Osnabrück) outlined past and present<br />

historiographical paradigms of the sixteenth- and seventeenth-century<br />

origins of state formation in the British Isles and the Holy Roman<br />

Empire. The rise of the modern state constituted one of the central<br />

themes of <strong>German</strong> historical scholarship for much of the nineteenth<br />

and twentieth centuries, not least because <strong>German</strong> national experience<br />

of statehood was felt to be defective by European standards.<br />

However, the traumatic experience of the National Socialist state as<br />

the ultimate manifestation of the undemocratic Machtstaat led to a<br />

reassessment of stereotypes of national state formation which had<br />

hitherto been uncritically accepted. Among the new developments in<br />

post-war <strong>German</strong> historiography was a positive reassessment of the<br />

Holy Roman Empire’s constitutional structure. �rom the 1960s<br />

onwards, historians began to investigate the social origins of<br />

<strong>German</strong>y’s path to 1933. <strong>German</strong> re-unification revived the longstanding<br />

debate on the existence of a <strong>German</strong> Sonderweg, but the exponents<br />

of a ‘re-revised’ view of the Holy Roman Empire now stress<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!