Download - German Historical Institute London
Download - German Historical Institute London
Download - German Historical Institute London
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Book Reviews<br />
is said in the Weimar chapter about the Reichsbanner, the Republican<br />
defence formation established mainly by Social Democrats. Its leader,<br />
Otto Hirsing, is not mentioned in the index.<br />
Despite the fact that the Weimar Republic did create a genuinely<br />
‘modern’ political system for the <strong>German</strong> nation-state, Winkler<br />
regards its constitution as fundamentally flawed. This was largely<br />
due to the widespread distrust of parliamentary democracy among<br />
the <strong>German</strong> middle class. The creation of a parallel source of power,<br />
in the shape of the popularly elected president, weakened parliamentary<br />
government and enabled the political parties in the Reichstag<br />
to evade responsibility. With the election of an Ersatzkaiser in the<br />
shape of �ield Marshal Hindenburg in 1925 this anomaly was to prove<br />
fatal. Winkler stresses the part played by the East Elbian élite surrounding<br />
Hindenburg for the disastrous decision to appoint Hitler<br />
Chancellor. But he also points out that there were other, more deepseated,<br />
causes of Hitler’s success. Quite apart from the appalling economic<br />
difficulties created by the world depression, Weimar was burdened<br />
with the widespread hostility of large sections of the propertied<br />
and educated classes, which regarded the Republic as the child of<br />
defeat and humiliation. Not only did they feel that the defeat should<br />
be reversed, but they believed that <strong>German</strong>y had a great new opportunity<br />
to fulfil its destiny. With the Austro–Hungarian Empire dissolved<br />
and Russia isolated under the Bolsheviks, the way seemed open<br />
to recreate the mythical Reich of ancient tradition. The fact that the<br />
National Socialists were led by an Austrian who, despite his own contempt<br />
for Christianity, did not hesitate to invoke the Almighty when<br />
declaiming his historic mission, strengthened the Nazi appeal to<br />
romantic yearnings for a God-given imperium in which the <strong>German</strong>s<br />
would reign supreme. Winkler sees this vision as the bridge which<br />
Hitler was able to build to the conservative classes in <strong>German</strong>y before<br />
1933. Certainly the greater <strong>German</strong> Reich, for which he took the credit,<br />
was a widespread inspiration for the educated middle class. In<br />
1920, for example, Hermann Oncken stated that the only aim left for<br />
<strong>German</strong>s after the collapse of the Habsburg Empire was the ‘return to<br />
the greater <strong>German</strong> idea’. This idea could attract Lutherans, who saw<br />
it as the extension of nationalist <strong>German</strong> Protestantism over central<br />
Europe, and some Roman Catholics, who welcomed the chance to<br />
redress the confessional imbalance in <strong>German</strong>y. Winkler makes it<br />
clear that Hitler, for all his rhetorical references to God, was con-<br />
82