05.11.2012 Views

Download - German Historical Institute London

Download - German Historical Institute London

Download - German Historical Institute London

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

History of <strong>German</strong>y from 1806 to Reunification<br />

demonstrations for peace at the end of July 1914, and the decisions<br />

which led to war were not taken by the elected representatives of the<br />

<strong>German</strong> people.<br />

Winkler describes vividly the disastrous impact of the war on<br />

<strong>German</strong>y’s political culture, exacerbating as it did social tensions and<br />

racial hatred, and dividing both working-class and middle-class<br />

<strong>German</strong>s into hostile camps. Although the course of the war finally<br />

pushed a reluctant imperial government to grant concessions in the<br />

direction of parliamentary control over the Reich government and<br />

the reform of the lop-sided franchise in Prussia, events in October<br />

1918 demonstrated that no serious will for change existed in military<br />

or court circles. It is difficult to see how, without the collapse of the<br />

Wilhelmine Empire as the result of the catastrophic war, there could<br />

have been a democratic revolution in <strong>German</strong>y. As it was, this revolution<br />

was only made possible by the fact that the Social Democratic<br />

movement had split, and that the majority party was willing to collaborate<br />

with middle-class colleagues to create a genuinely parliamentary<br />

Republic. Winkler firmly rejects the older left-wing critique<br />

of Weimar, which reproved the Social Democrats for their failure to<br />

carry out root-and-branch socialization in an advanced industrial<br />

nation, the civil institutions of which had not collapsed to anything<br />

like the extent of those in Russia. The only result of such a revolution<br />

would have been chaos and civil war.<br />

As one would expect from a distinguished historian of the<br />

<strong>German</strong> labour movement, Winkler has much that is interesting to<br />

say about the SPD in the Weimar Republic. He is perhaps overly critical<br />

of its leaders for not doing more to collaborate with moderate<br />

‘bourgeois’ parties. One problem Weimar had was that the values<br />

which inform the �ederal Republic today—commitment to a market<br />

economy and free trade, a belief in pragmatic compromise as a way<br />

to overcome sectional conflicts, scepticism in the face of utopian ideologies—were<br />

not at all powerful in <strong>German</strong>y during the 1920s. �or<br />

many rank-and-file SPD supporters ‘socialism’ was a more important<br />

objective than parliamentary democracy. This attitude was strengthened<br />

by the open fear and contempt for the ‘Sozis’ exhibited by their<br />

middle-class compatriots. SPD leaders also had to look over their<br />

shoulders at an increasingly popular and viciously disruptive<br />

<strong>German</strong> Communist Party. But they did what they could to defend<br />

the Republic, and in this respect it is noteworthy that relatively little<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!