Download - German Historical Institute London
Download - German Historical Institute London
Download - German Historical Institute London
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Enlightenment typical of the larger <strong>German</strong> territories with their vast<br />
bureaucracies. Whereas ‘enlightened absolutism’, best identified<br />
with the Prussia of �rederick the Great, pressed for reforms to centralize<br />
power in the state apparatus, ‘federal Enlightenment’ was<br />
indebted to the ideal of diversity, ‘decentralised government and<br />
political pluralism’ (p. ix). It displayed strong sympathy for the political<br />
structure of the Old Reich with its multitude of small political<br />
units. �ederal Enlightenment, which, according to Umbach, was pioneered<br />
by Prince �ranz, thus combined notions of improvement and<br />
reform with a defence of the political and legal order of the Empire.<br />
Like his intellectual concerns, �ranz’s political views found visual<br />
expression in the garden at Wörlitz, most visibly in the Gothic<br />
House which Umbach subjects to detailed scrutiny. Built in a style<br />
reminiscent of the English neo-Gothic of the time, but interspersed<br />
with attributes more common in Palladian buildings, the deliberately<br />
eclectic architecture worked at several levels. Its crenellations conjured<br />
up the world of medieval castles and knights. On the other<br />
hand, the Gothic pointed arch, supposedly derived from the archetype<br />
of the primitive bark hut, hinted at the Goths and, by implication,<br />
at a primitive past of unspoiled virtues and especially of ancient<br />
liberties. As in the case of the Temple of Liberty at Stowe, Gothic or<br />
Saxon liberties were thus invoked. While in England they were<br />
drawn upon to defend the ancient constitution against being overthrown<br />
by despotic politicians like Robert Walpole, in the political<br />
setting of the <strong>German</strong> Empire they must be understood as protecting<br />
old imperial rights against modern states like Prussia. At the same<br />
time, the regular architectural features, symbolizing ‘the more rational,<br />
institutional thinking of the Renaissance epoch’ (p. 153), can be<br />
read against the backdrop of the concurrent imperial reform discussion<br />
which reveals a comparable divide between representatives of<br />
an idealized medieval image of the Empire (for example, Justus<br />
Möser) and those who stressed the legal and rational institutions of<br />
the Old Reich, such as the Reichskammergericht (Imperial Chamber<br />
Court) established during the Renaissance (for example, Stephan<br />
Pütter). �rom such a perspective, the Gothic House symbolized the<br />
reconciliation of the rational and the irrational in the interests of<br />
imperial self-defence. More clear-cut than the exterior was the symbolic<br />
language of the interior where references to imperial history<br />
and the federal constitution multiplied. Numerous artefacts, like<br />
53<br />
A War of Words?