02.12.2014 Views

Innovation in European healthcare – what can Sweden learn? - LIF

Innovation in European healthcare – what can Sweden learn? - LIF

Innovation in European healthcare – what can Sweden learn? - LIF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PbR is be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>crementally reformed to <strong>in</strong>centivise<br />

quality care through Best Practice Tariffs (BPTs)<br />

• Although tariffs are based on national average costs, they are not exactly reflective of them. The DH<br />

re<strong>in</strong>forces the cost-reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>centive of a tariff fixed at average cost by annually reduc<strong>in</strong>g all tariffs to<br />

encourage efficient use of NHS resources.<br />

• PbR system does not conta<strong>in</strong> any safeguards to balance the risk of los<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ical quality when cost-cutt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is prioritised.<br />

• Best Practice Tariffs (BPTs) were <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> 2010/11 to <strong>in</strong>centivise reimbursement based on cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />

quality and shift away from cost<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms based on average costs.<br />

• BPTs have been <strong>in</strong>troduced where the costs are below the national average costs for a given procedure, or<br />

where there is signifi<strong>can</strong>t unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed variation <strong>in</strong> current practice, or where the evidence base def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

good practice is strong.<br />

• BPTs have their scope expanded on an annual basis. The revisions are prioritis<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>itiative to shift<br />

hospital activity and its costs to other care sett<strong>in</strong>gs. It will expand the number of procedures covered by the<br />

BPTs and aim to <strong>in</strong>centivise day case and outpatient activity<br />

• Similarly, a ‘pay for performance’ component is <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> the form of the Commission<strong>in</strong>g for Quality<br />

and <strong>Innovation</strong> (CQUIN) payment framework.<br />

• CQUIN was first <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> 2009/10. It acts as a further <strong>in</strong>centive for providers by allow<strong>in</strong>g them to<br />

potentially earn an additional 2.5% of their <strong>in</strong>come depend<strong>in</strong>g on how well they meet specific standards of<br />

quality improvement.<br />

132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!