Russia's European Agenda and The Baltic States - Defence ...

RUSSIA’S EUROPEAN AGENDA AND THE BALTIC STATES
Notes
1. Braithwaite, R., ‘Russia under Putin’, Lecture for Global Security MSc, (RMCS,
Cranfield University (UK), 15 March 2002).
2. Motieka, E., Statkus, N., and Daniliauskas, J., ‘Global Geopolitical
Developments and Opportunities for Lithuania’s Foreign Policy’, in Lithuanian Annual
Strategic Review (Vilnius: Lithuanian Military Academy, 2005), p. 44.
3. Bugajski, J., ‘Russia’s New Europe’, in The National Interest (2003/2004
Winter).
4. ‘Wider Europe’ – not the EU as it is today, but a truly inclusive community of
European nations, capable of developing dynamically, is impossible without Russia
in the economic, political, cultural or military areas. The idea of ‘Wider Europe’ later
became the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP).
5. Trenin, D., ‘Russia leaves the West’, in Foreign Affairs (July/August 2006);
http://www.carnegie.ru/en/print/74440-print.htm.
6. Knudsen, O.F., ‘Of Lambs and Lions: relations between great powers and
their smaller neighbours’, in Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. XXIII, No 4 (1988), pp. 111-
122.
7. Kværnø, O., ‘When Security Strategies Collide’, in Baltic Defence Review, No. 4
(Tartu: Baltic Security Society, 2000), p. 74.
8. Ibid, p. 73.
9. These schools of thought represent, respectively, three paradigms of international
relations – realism, pluralism and globalism. The depiction of international relations
field in terms of these three images is comparable in some respects to a categorisation
devised by James N. Rosenau: state-centric, multi-centric and global-centric approaches
to international politics. See Rosenau, J. N., ‘Order and Disorder in the Study of World
Politics’, in Maghruri, R., and Ramberg, B. (eds.), Globalism versus Realism: International
Relations’ Third Debate (Boulder, CO: Westview press, 1982), pp. 1-7.
10. Straus, I. L., ‘Unipolarity: The Concentric Structure of the New World Order
and the Position of Russia’, in Kosmopolis Almanac, Moscow, 1997, pp. 158-159.
11. Pursiainen, C., Russian Foreign Policy and International Relations Theory,
(Aldershot (UK): Ashgate, 2000), p. 101.
12. Knudsen, pp. 111-122.
13. Ibid, p. 111.
14. Keohane, R. O., ‘Lilliputians' Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics’,
in International Organisation, Vol. 23 (Spring 1969), pp. 295-296.
15. Knudsen, p. 115.
16. Bauwens, W., Clesse, A., and Knudsen, O. F. (eds.), Small States and the Security
Challenge in the New Europe (London, Washington: Brassey’s, 1996), p.10.
17. Knudsen, p. 112.
18. Ibid, p. 118.
19. Bauwens, Clesse, Knudsen, p. 13.
20. For the detail description of all six variables see ibid, pp.10-16.
48