222467to222472
222467to222472
222467to222472
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Maria Alvanou<br />
IDF may use them as staging posts for their operations or to detain people in their<br />
custody. A large number of settlers are armed and settlers have been accused of<br />
occasionally attacking Palestinians and destroying Palestinian houses and other<br />
property. However, settlers as such are civilians, unless when they are serving in<br />
the Israeli armed forces. Israeli settlements in the Occupied Territories are argued<br />
as unlawful under the provisions of international humanitarian law, as the Fourth<br />
Geneva Convention prohibits the transfer of civilians from the occupying power’s<br />
territory into the occupied territory (Article 49.6). However, the debated unlawful<br />
status of Israeli settlements does not affect the civilian status of the settlers.<br />
Settlers, like any other civilians, cannot be targeted and only lose their protection<br />
from attack if and for only during the time they take a direct part in hostilities. 30<br />
Similarly, Palestinian residents of the West Bank and Gaza are civilians benefiting<br />
from the protection of the Fourth Geneva Convention unless and for such time as<br />
they take direct part in hostilities.<br />
Palestinian suicide attacks: operational, tactical and media<br />
expressions of a crime<br />
According to the point of view chosen, there are many ways to name and describe<br />
this type of operation that seems to terrify so much. “Genocide bombings” and<br />
“homicide attacks” are phrases frequently used by those who identify with the<br />
unwilling victims of attacks and these terms emphasize the criminal nature of the<br />
violence and de-emphasize the self-inflicted death of the perpetrator. On the other<br />
hand, “martyrdom operations” place the emphasis upon the cause of the<br />
perpetrators, implying a connection to the notions of “holy war” and/or self<br />
defence, even in the killing of civilians. Finally “suicide operations” or “missions”<br />
places the emphasis on the self-immolation of the perpetrator and the<br />
organization’s role in staging the episodes. Of course, none of the above used terms<br />
is perfect or exclusive, exhaustive on itself, because the self-explosion of people to<br />
kill others is not a simple phenomenon and it entails many or all of the above<br />
characteristics. Each of the terms highlights a specific parameter and can be used<br />
accordingly.<br />
An adequate definition of a suicide attack could be one of an “operational method<br />
in which the very act of the attack is dependent upon the death of the perpetrator.<br />
The terrorist is fully aware that if she/he does not kill her/himself, the planned<br />
attack will not be implemented” (Ganor, 2003). The death of the perpetrator is the<br />
key to the success of the attack; and he/she knows in advance that success depends<br />
entirely on this death (Schweitzer, 2002). The aim of the psychologically and<br />
physically war-trained terrorist is to die while destroying the enemy target. The<br />
terrorist’s self explosion has an aim to produce a massacre, which is no mistake,<br />
58