222467to222472
222467to222472
222467to222472
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Maria Alvanou<br />
Notes<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
The Arabic term “Intifada” means the “uprising” and has been used to describe the fight<br />
of the Palestinians against the Israelis. Regarding suicide bombings in Israel, data are<br />
available on-line from Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs site<br />
(http://mfa.gov.il/mfa/terrorism-<br />
%obstacle20to%peace/palestinian%20terror%20since%202000/) and the International<br />
Policy Institute for Counter Terrorism data base (http://www.ict.org.il/arabisr_frame.htm).<br />
Also, for a resource file on the issue and the Palestinian perspective on<br />
it, see Michele Esposito, “The Al-Aqsa Intifada: Military Operations, Suicide Attacks,<br />
Assassinations, and Losses in the First Four Years,” Journal of Palestine Studies, 134,<br />
no.2 (Winter 2004), pp. 85-122.<br />
This is not the first time that Palestinian armed groups have used suicide bombings to<br />
target Israeli civilians, although the scale and intensity of the current wave of attacks is<br />
unprecedented. Between September 1993 and the outbreak of the latest clashes between<br />
Palestinians and Israelis in late September 2000, Palestinian groups carried out fourteen<br />
suicide bombing attacks against Israeli civilians, mostly in 1996-97, killing more than<br />
120 and wounding over 550. Suicide bombing attacks against Israeli civilians in late<br />
February and early March 1996 killed fifty-six and injured more than 150. Five attacks<br />
in 1997 killed twenty-nine and wounded more than two hundred. The last suicide<br />
bombing prior to the current unrest was an attack in November 1998 that wounded<br />
twenty-four. There were no Palestinian suicide bomb attacks against civilians in 1999 or<br />
2000.<br />
It is a known and over discussed fact that there is no uniform definition of terrorism and<br />
no universal consensus to it. Just indicatively the US State in Title 22 of the U.S. Code,<br />
Chapter 38, Section 2656f(d) defines terrorism as: “Premeditated, politically motivated<br />
violence perpetrated against non-combatant targets by sub national groups or<br />
clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience”; the definition of the<br />
United Nations reads as follows: “any act intended to cause death or serious bodily<br />
injury to a civilian, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities in a<br />
situation of armed conflict, when the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to<br />
intimidate a population, or to compel a government or an international organization to<br />
do or to abstain from doing any act” (Article 2(b) of International Convention for the<br />
Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, May 5, 2004).<br />
Borrowing Justice’s Potter Stewart’s famous words: “I shall not today attempt to further<br />
define [pornography]…but I know it when I see it”, In: Jacobellis v. Ohio, June 22,<br />
1964.<br />
Although the research literature on terrorism has been expanded dramatically since the<br />
1970s, not that adequate work has been done by criminologists or has appeared in<br />
criminology journals.<br />
66