13.01.2015 Views

222467to222472

222467to222472

222467to222472

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Maria Alvanou<br />

Notes<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

The Arabic term “Intifada” means the “uprising” and has been used to describe the fight<br />

of the Palestinians against the Israelis. Regarding suicide bombings in Israel, data are<br />

available on-line from Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs site<br />

(http://mfa.gov.il/mfa/terrorism-<br />

%obstacle20to%peace/palestinian%20terror%20since%202000/) and the International<br />

Policy Institute for Counter Terrorism data base (http://www.ict.org.il/arabisr_frame.htm).<br />

Also, for a resource file on the issue and the Palestinian perspective on<br />

it, see Michele Esposito, “The Al-Aqsa Intifada: Military Operations, Suicide Attacks,<br />

Assassinations, and Losses in the First Four Years,” Journal of Palestine Studies, 134,<br />

no.2 (Winter 2004), pp. 85-122.<br />

This is not the first time that Palestinian armed groups have used suicide bombings to<br />

target Israeli civilians, although the scale and intensity of the current wave of attacks is<br />

unprecedented. Between September 1993 and the outbreak of the latest clashes between<br />

Palestinians and Israelis in late September 2000, Palestinian groups carried out fourteen<br />

suicide bombing attacks against Israeli civilians, mostly in 1996-97, killing more than<br />

120 and wounding over 550. Suicide bombing attacks against Israeli civilians in late<br />

February and early March 1996 killed fifty-six and injured more than 150. Five attacks<br />

in 1997 killed twenty-nine and wounded more than two hundred. The last suicide<br />

bombing prior to the current unrest was an attack in November 1998 that wounded<br />

twenty-four. There were no Palestinian suicide bomb attacks against civilians in 1999 or<br />

2000.<br />

It is a known and over discussed fact that there is no uniform definition of terrorism and<br />

no universal consensus to it. Just indicatively the US State in Title 22 of the U.S. Code,<br />

Chapter 38, Section 2656f(d) defines terrorism as: “Premeditated, politically motivated<br />

violence perpetrated against non-combatant targets by sub national groups or<br />

clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience”; the definition of the<br />

United Nations reads as follows: “any act intended to cause death or serious bodily<br />

injury to a civilian, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities in a<br />

situation of armed conflict, when the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to<br />

intimidate a population, or to compel a government or an international organization to<br />

do or to abstain from doing any act” (Article 2(b) of International Convention for the<br />

Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, May 5, 2004).<br />

Borrowing Justice’s Potter Stewart’s famous words: “I shall not today attempt to further<br />

define [pornography]…but I know it when I see it”, In: Jacobellis v. Ohio, June 22,<br />

1964.<br />

Although the research literature on terrorism has been expanded dramatically since the<br />

1970s, not that adequate work has been done by criminologists or has appeared in<br />

criminology journals.<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!